IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v35y2021i5p837-855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Can a Disability Quota System Empower Disabled Individuals in the Workplace? The Case of France

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Richard

    (EM Strasbourg Business School, France)

  • Sophie Hennekam

    (Audencia Business School, France)

Abstract

This study uses an empowerment theory perspective to examine how a disability quota system affects the decision to disclose one’s disability at work. The study reports on 39 life story interviews with disabled individuals who recently entered or were seeking to enter the labour market in France. The study shows that when considering the disclosure decision, disabled workers reflect on personal attributes, such as their educational level, the visibility of their disability and whether they need workplace adaptations; on the organisational environment, such as the organisation’s commitment to diversity; and on the legal context (underpinned by the biopsychosocial model), in this case, the quota system. These reflections determine whether the disabled workers perceive their disability status as a valuable attribute and whether legal disclosure can be empowering. This study proposes a nuanced perspective by highlighting both the system’s potential for empowerment and for propagating inequality among disabled workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Richard & Sophie Hennekam, 2021. "When Can a Disability Quota System Empower Disabled Individuals in the Workplace? The Case of France," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(5), pages 837-855, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:35:y:2021:i:5:p:837-855
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017020946672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017020946672
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017020946672?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:35:y:2021:i:5:p:837-855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.