IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v28y2026i2p362-380.html

The Role of Information, Rewards, and Convenience in Take-Back Programs for Clothing

Author

Listed:
  • Erin C. McKie

    (Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210)

  • Anna Sáez de Tejada Cuenca

    (IESE Business School, 08034 Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain)

  • Vishal Agrawal

    (McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia 20057)

Abstract

Problem definition : Fashion retailers are increasingly implementing take-back programs to reduce textile waste and prevent used clothing from being landfilled. To increase participation, retailers must decide how much and what type of information to provide to consumers, how to collect the used clothing, and how much of a financial reward to offer. However, the effectiveness of different types of information, convenience, and reward levels on consumer participation is not well understood, and participation rates in take-back programs remain low. Methodology/results : We examine the effect of different information levels (i.e., none, generic, and different types of specific information) and convenience levels on the reward required by consumers to return their used clothing through four experiments involving over 5,200 subjects. Across all experiments, we find that providing generic information that collected items will be diverted from the landfill significantly decreases the reward required by consumers to return their used clothing. However, we find that providing information about a specific circular economy strategy does not necessarily help. When the collected clothing will be recycled (either as open-loop or as closed-loop), consumers’ required reward is not significantly different from when the clothing will just be diverted from the landfill. Moreover, we find that when collected clothing will be resold, consumers’ required reward is significantly higher. We show that the negative response to resale is due to the consumers’ aversion to the retailer explicitly profiting from the returned clothing. We also find that making the return process more convenient lowers the reward required by consumers. Managerial implications : Our results offer several managerial insights. We find that information can be an effective lever to increase consumers’ participation in take-back programs, but only if used judiciously. If a retailer intends to resell collected clothing, it may consider offering a higher reward or making the return process more convenient. Even though a more convenient return process may be more costly for the retailer, those additional costs may be offset by the lower reward required by the consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Erin C. McKie & Anna Sáez de Tejada Cuenca & Vishal Agrawal, 2026. "The Role of Information, Rewards, and Convenience in Take-Back Programs for Clothing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 362-380, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:28:y:2026:i:2:p:362-380
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2023.0561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0561
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2023.0561?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Basak Kalkanci & Erica L. Plambeck, 2020. "Managing Supplier Social and Environmental Impacts with Voluntary Versus Mandatory Disclosure to Investors," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3311-3328, August.
    2. Ravi Subramanian & Ramanath Subramanyam, 2012. "Key Factors in the Market for Remanufactured Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 315-326, April.
    3. Sezer Ülkü & Claudiu V. Dimofte & Glen M. Schmidt, 2012. "Consumer Valuation of Modularly Upgradeable Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(9), pages 1761-1776, September.
    4. Lloyd-Smith, Patrick & Adamowicz, Wiktor, 2018. "Can stated measures of willingness-to-accept be valid? Evidence from laboratory experiments," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 133-149.
    5. Bente Halvorsen, 2008. "Effects of Norms and Opportunity Cost of Time on Household Recycling," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 84(3), pages 501-516.
    6. Krupka, Erin L. & Stephens, Melvin, 2013. "The stability of measured time preferences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 11-19.
    7. Ryan W. Buell & Basak Kalkanci, 2021. "How Transparency into Internal and External Responsibility Initiatives Influences Consumer Choice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 932-950, February.
    8. Tamar Makov & George E. Newman, 2016. "Economic gains stimulate negative evaluations of corporate sustainability initiatives," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 844-846, September.
    9. Reza Zanjirani Farahani & Nasrin Asgari & Luk van Wassenhove, 2022. "Fast Fashion, Charities, and the Circular Economy: Challenges for Operations Management," Post-Print hal-03696947, HAL.
    10. Tim Kraft & León Valdés & Yanchong Zheng, 2018. "Supply Chain Visibility and Social Responsibility: Investigating Consumers’ Behaviors and Motives," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 617-636, October.
    11. Lisha Zhang & Man Yui Leung & Svetlana Boriskina & Xiaoming Tao, 2023. "Advancing life cycle sustainability of textiles through technological innovations," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(3), pages 243-253, March.
    12. Reza Zanjirani Farahani & Nasrin Asgari & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2022. "Fast Fashion, Charities, and the Circular Economy: Challenges for Operations Management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1089-1114, March.
    13. Janakiraman, Narayan & Syrdal, Holly A. & Freling, Ryan, 2016. "The Effect of Return Policy Leniency on Consumer Purchase and Return Decisions: A Meta-analytic Review," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 226-235.
    14. Xuanming Bai & Tsan‐Ming Choi & Yongjian Li & Xiaochen Sun, 2023. "Implementing trade‐in programs in the presence of resale platforms: Mode selection and pricing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(10), pages 3193-3208, October.
    15. Daniel Read & Shane Frederick & Burcu Orsel & Juwaria Rahman, 2005. "Four Score and Seven Years from Now: The Date/Delay Effect in Temporal Discounting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(9), pages 1326-1335, September.
    16. Franziska Voelckner, 2006. "An empirical comparison of methods for measuring consumers’ willingness to pay," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 137-149, April.
    17. Gökçe Esenduran & James A. Hill & In Joon Noh, 2020. "Understanding the Choice of Online Resale Channel for Used Electronics," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(5), pages 1188-1211, May.
    18. Erin C. McKie & Mark E. Ferguson & Michael R. Galbreth & Sriram Venkataraman, 2018. "How Do Consumers Choose between Multiple Product Generations and Conditions? An Empirical Study of iPad Sales on eBay," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(8), pages 1574-1594, August.
    19. Kahneman, Daniel & Knetsch, Jack L & Thaler, Richard, 1986. "Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(4), pages 728-741, September.
    20. Palan, Stefan & Schitter, Christian, 2018. "Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 22-27.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Necati Ertekin & Yuanyuan Ding & Karen Donohue, 2024. "Strategic Visual Merchandising of New and Open-Box Products: Evidence from Experiment and Retail Data," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(4), pages 2047-2065, April.
    2. Bayrak, Busra & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Guo, Shu, 2025. "Regulated closed-loop supply chains for climate change mitigation: interplays of policies, strategies, and sustainability impacts," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    3. Marriott, Joshua & Bektaş, Tolga & Leung, Erik Ka Ho & Lyons, Andrew, 2025. "The billion-pound question in fashion E-commerce: Investigating the anatomy of returns," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    4. Nils Roemer & Gilvan C. Souza & Christian Tröster & Guido Voigt, 2023. "Offset or reduce: How should firms implement carbon footprint reduction initiatives?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(9), pages 2940-2955, September.
    5. Nughthoh Arfawi Kurdhi & Shaunak S. Dabadghao & Jan C. Fransoo, 2024. "Should I endorse a third party? Authorization strategies for brand manufacturers in a refurbishing market," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 1253-1291, December.
    6. Feryal Erhun & Tim Kraft & Sytske Wijnsma, 2021. "Sustainable Triple‐A Supply Chains," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(3), pages 644-655, March.
    7. Shusaku Sasaki & Naoko Okuyama & Masao Ogaki & Fumio Ohtake, 2017. "Education and pro-family altruistic discrimination against foreigners: Five-country comparisons," ISER Discussion Paper 1002, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
    8. Chen, Jing & Yu, Bo & Chen, Bintong & Liu, Zhuojun, 2023. "Lenient vs. stringent returns policies in the presence of fraudulent returns: The role of customers’ fairness perceptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    9. Anna Kukla-Gryz & Joanna Tyrowicz & Michał Krawczyk, 2021. "Digital piracy and the perception of price fairness: evidence from a field experiment," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(1), pages 105-131, March.
    10. Srivastava, Shefali & Dwivedi, Ashish & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Dey, Bidit L. & Koufopoulos, Dimitrios N., 2024. "Mindfully fashioned: Sustaining style through product value retention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    11. Tsz-Ning Wong & Lily Ling Yang & Andrey Zhukov, 2024. "Optimal Disclosure Mandate in Supply Chains," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2024/468, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
    12. Ke-Wei Huang, 2009. "Optimal criteria for selecting price discrimination metrics when buyers have log-normally distributed willingness-to-pay," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 321-341, September.
    13. Li, Na & Li, Guo & Xue, Jing, 2025. "Does ESG protect firms equally during crises? The role of supply chain concentration," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    14. Barbara Bigliardi & Domenico Campisi & Giovanna Ferraro & Serena Filippelli & Francesco Galati & Alberto Petroni, 2020. "The Intention to Purchase Recycled Products: Towards an Integrative Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Aydın Alptekinoğlu & Adem Örsdemir, 2022. "Is Adopting Mass Customization a Path to Environmentally Sustainable Fashion?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 2982-3000, November.
    16. Hanu Tyagi & Manuel Hermosilla & Rachna Shah, 2025. "Does Transparency Hinder Technological Novelty? Evidence from Large Pharmaceutical Firms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1415-1432, September.
    17. Ryan W. Buell & Ethan Porter & Michael I. Norton, 2021. "Surfacing the Submerged State: Operational Transparency Increases Trust in and Engagement with Government," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 781-802, July.
    18. Gao, Ruoxin & Yao, Shiqing & Yang, Ruina, 2024. "Responsible audit and consumer awareness under collusion risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 466-476.
    19. Ryan W. Buell & MoonSoo Choi, 2025. "Improving Customer Compatibility with Tradeoff Transparency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(2), pages 1335-1355, February.
    20. Lyndie Bayne & Juliana Ng & Marvin Wee, 2022. "Supply chain disclosure: stakeholder preferences versus current practice in Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3875-3911, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:28:y:2026:i:2:p:362-380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.