IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jleorg/v42y2026i1p342-356..html

Optimal disclosure mandate in supply chains

Author

Listed:
  • Tsz-Ning Wong
  • Lily Ling Yang
  • Andrey Zhukov

Abstract

We study a model in which a firm can acquire conclusive evidence about its supplier’s social and environmental impacts. We identify the disclosure mandate that maximizes market information. A disclosure mandate determines whether (1) the firm’s investigation effort is observable by the market and (2) obtained evidence is disclosed to the market. When the supply chain visibility is low, the firm does not know its supplier’s impacts. The combination of covert investigation and voluntary disclosure of obtained evidence incentivizes the firm to acquire evidence and constitutes the optimal disclosure mandate. When the supply chain visibility is high, the firm knows its supplier’s impacts. Overt investigation and mandatory disclosure of obtained evidence together enable the firm to signal its private knowledge through the chosen investigation effort and maximize market information. The sharp contrast of these two cases highlights the importance of supply chain visibility in determining the optimal mandate.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsz-Ning Wong & Lily Ling Yang & Andrey Zhukov, 2026. "Optimal disclosure mandate in supply chains," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(1), pages 342-356.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:42:y:2026:i:1:p:342-356.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jleo/ewae031
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:42:y:2026:i:1:p:342-356.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jleo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.