IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i4p1585-1602.html

Inventory-Responsive Donor-Management Policy: A Tandem Queueing Network Model

Author

Listed:
  • Taozeng Zhu

    (Institute of Supply Chain Analytics, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian 116025, China)

  • Nicholas Teck Boon Yeo

    (International Business School Suzhou, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215000, China)

  • Sarah Yini Gao

    (Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University, Singapore 178899)

  • Gar Goei Loke

    (Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062PA Rotterdam, Netherlands)

Abstract

Problem definition : In the blood-donor-management problem, the blood bank incentivizes donors to donate, given blood inventory levels. We propose a model to optimize such incentivization schemes under the context of random demand, blood perishability, observation period between donations, and variability in donor arrivals and dropouts. Methodology/results : We propose an optimization model that simultaneously accounts for the dynamics in the blood inventory and the donor’s donation process, as a coupled queueing network. We adopt the Pipeline Queue paradigm, which leads us to a tractable convex reformulation. The coupled setting requires new methodologies to be developed upon the existing Pipeline Queue framework. Numerical results demonstrate the advantages of the optimal policy by comparing it with the commonly adopted and studied threshold policy. Our optimal policy can effectively reduce both shortages and wastage. Managerial implications : Our model is the first to operationalize a dynamic donor-incentivization scheme, by determining the optimal number of donors of different donation responsiveness to receive each type of incentive. It can serve as a decision-support tool that incorporates practical features of blood supply-chain management not addressed thus far, to the best of our knowledge. Simulations on existing policies indicate the dangers of myopic approaches and justify the need for smoother and forward-looking donor-incentivization schedules that can hedge against future demand variation. Our model also has potential wider applications in supply chains with perishable inventory.

Suggested Citation

  • Taozeng Zhu & Nicholas Teck Boon Yeo & Sarah Yini Gao & Gar Goei Loke, 2023. "Inventory-Responsive Donor-Management Policy: A Tandem Queueing Network Model," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1585-1602, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:4:p:1585-1602
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2023.1228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.1228
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2023.1228?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ashwin Aravindakshan & Olivier Rubel & Oliver Rutz, 2015. "Managing Blood Donations with Marketing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 269-280, March.
    2. David B. Brown & Enrico De Giorgi & Melvyn Sim, 2012. "Aspirational Preferences and Their Representation by Risk Measures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(11), pages 2095-2113, November.
    3. David Lingenbrink & Krishnamurthy Iyer, 2019. "Optimal Signaling Mechanisms in Unobservable Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1397-1416, September.
    4. David B. Brown & Melvyn Sim, 2009. "Satisficing Measures for Analysis of Risky Positions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 71-84, January.
    5. Robert J. Aumann & Roberto Serrano, 2008. "An Economic Index of Riskiness," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 116(5), pages 810-836, October.
    6. Steven Nahmias & William P. Pierskalla, 1973. "Optimal ordering policies for a product that perishes in two periods subject to stochastic demand," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 207-229, June.
    7. Stephanie A. Heger & Robert Slonim & Ellen Garbarino & Carmen Wang & Daniel Waller, 2020. "Redesigning the Market for Volunteers: A Donor Registry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3528-3541, August.
    8. Nikolaus Schweizer & Nora Szech, 2018. "Optimal Revelation of Life-Changing Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 5250-5262, November.
    9. Vivek Choudhary & Masha Shunko & Serguei Netessine & Seongjoon Koo, 2022. "Nudging Drivers to Safety: Evidence from a Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 4196-4214, June.
    10. Stephen C. Graves, 1982. "The Application of Queueing Theory to Continuous Perishable Inventory Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 400-406, April.
    11. J. G. Dai & Pengyi Shi, 2017. "A Two-Time-Scale Approach to Time-Varying Queues in Hospital Inpatient Flow Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 514-536, April.
    12. Tianshu Sun & Guodong (Gordon) Gao & Ginger Zhe Jin, 2019. "Mobile Messaging for Offline Group Formation in Prosocial Activities: A Large Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2717-2736, June.
    13. Sun, Tianshu & Lu, Susan Feng & Jin, Ginger Zhe, 2016. "Solving shortage in a priceless market: Insights from blood donation," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 149-165.
    14. Gregory P. Prastacos, 1981. "Allocation of a Perishable Product Inventory," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 95-107, February.
    15. Chon-Huat Goh & Betsy S. Greenberg & Hirofumi Matsuo, 1993. "Two-Stage Perishable Inventory Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(5), pages 633-649, May.
    16. Dirk Bergemann & Benjamin Brooks & Stephen Morris, 2017. "First‐Price Auctions With General Information Structures: Implications for Bidding and Revenue," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85, pages 107-143, January.
    17. Philipp Afèche & Mojtaba Araghi & Opher Baron, 2017. "Customer Acquisition, Retention, and Service Access Quality: Optimal Advertising, Capacity Level, and Capacity Allocation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 674-691, October.
    18. Beliën, Jeroen & Forcé, Hein, 2012. "Supply chain management of blood products: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 1-16.
    19. Steven Nahmias, 1976. "Myopic Approximations for the Perishable Inventory Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(9), pages 1002-1008, May.
    20. Nicola Lacetera & Mario Macis & Robert Slonim, 2014. "Rewarding Volunteers: A Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1107-1129, May.
    21. Dirk Bergemann & Benjamin Brooks & Stephen Morris, 2015. "The Limits of Price Discrimination," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(3), pages 921-957, March.
    22. Shouchang Chen & Yanzhi Li & Weihua Zhou, 2019. "Joint Decisions for Blood Collection and Platelet Inventory Control," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(7), pages 1674-1691, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peng Wang & Yun Fong Lim & Gar Goei Loke, 2026. "Joint Capacity Allocation and Job Assignment Under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(2), pages 1047-1069, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah Yini Gao & Yan He & Ruijie Zhang & Zhichao Zheng & Shao Wei Lam & Emile Tan, 2025. "Optimizing Initial Screening for Colorectal Cancer Detection with Adherence Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(9), pages 7516-7536, September.
    2. Can Zhang & Turgay Ayer & Chelsea C. White & Joy N. Bodeker & John D. Roback, 2023. "Inventory Sharing for Perishable Products: Application to Platelet Inventory Management in Hospital Blood Banks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(5), pages 1756-1776, September.
    3. Chua, Geoffrey A. & Senga, Juan Ramon L., 2022. "Blood supply interventions during disasters: Efficiency measures and strategies to mitigate volatility," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. Lucy Gongtao Chen & Daniel Zhuoyu Long & Melvyn Sim, 2015. "On Dynamic Decision Making to Meet Consumption Targets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1117-1130, October.
    5. Daniel Zhuoyu Long & Melvyn Sim & Minglong Zhou, 2023. "Robust Satisficing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(1), pages 61-82, January.
    6. Wilson Lin & Susan Feng Lu & Tianshu Sun, 2023. "Worker Experience and Donor Heterogeneity: The Impact of Charitable Workers on Donors’ Blood Donation Decisions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 939-957, May.
    7. Kebing Chen & Jing‐Sheng Song & Jennifer Shang & Tiaojun Xiao, 2022. "Managing hospital platelet inventory with mid‐cycle expedited replenishments and returns," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 2015-2037, May.
    8. Jake Clarkson & Michael A. Voelkel & Anna‐Lena Sachs & Ulrich W. Thonemann, 2023. "The periodic review model with independent age‐dependent lifetimes," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(3), pages 813-828, March.
    9. Patrick Jaillet & Jin Qi & Melvyn Sim, 2016. "Routing Optimization Under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 186-200, February.
    10. Meyer, Christian Johannes & Tripodi, Egon, 2021. "Image concerns in pledges to give blood: Evidence from a field experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Shouchang Chen & Yanzhi Li & Yi Yang & Weihua Zhou, 2021. "Managing Perishable Inventory Systems with Age‐differentiated Demand," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3784-3799, October.
    12. Leipnitz, Sigrun & de Vries, Martha & Clement, Michel & Mazar, Nina, 2018. "Providing health checks as incentives to retain blood donors — Evidence from two field experiments," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 628-640.
    13. Bruhin, Adrian & Goette, Lorenz & Haenni, Simon & Jiang, Lingqing, 2020. "Spillovers of prosocial motivation: Evidence from an intervention study on blood donors," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Puranam, Kartikeya & Novak, David C. & Lucas, Marilyn T. & Fung, Mark, 2017. "Managing blood inventory with multiple independent sources of supply," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 500-511.
    15. Motamedi, Maryam & Li, Na & Down, Douglas G., 2026. "Optimal ordering policy for perishable products by incorporating demand forecasts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 329(1), pages 124-137.
    16. Kocourek, Pavel & Steiner, Jakub & Stewart, Colin, 2024. "Boundedly rational demand," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 19(4), November.
    17. Garrett, Daniel F., 2021. "Payoff implications of incentive contracting," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 16(4), November.
    18. Thomas Mariotti & Nikolaus Schweizer & Nora Szech & Jonas von Wangenheim, 2023. "Information Nudges and Self-Control," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2182-2197, April.
    19. Luqi Qin & Erbao Cao, 2024. "Decision-making and performance of the agricultural supply chain: risk-neutral farmer vs target-oriented farmer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(2), pages 961-980, September.
    20. Tommaso Denti & Doron Ravid, 2023. "Robust Predictions in Games with Rational Inattention," Papers 2306.09964, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:4:p:1585-1602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.