IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v68y2022i7p5233-5251.html

The Creator Economy: Managing Ecosystem Supply, Revenue Sharing, and Platform Design

Author

Listed:
  • Hemant K. Bhargava

    (Graduate School of Management, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616)

Abstract

Many digital platforms give users a bundle of goods sourced from numerous creators, generate revenue through consumption of these goods, and motivate creators by sharing of revenue. This paper studies the platform’s design choices and creators’ participation and supply decisions when users’ (viewers’) consumption of goods (content) is financed by third-party advertisers. The model specifies the platform’s scale: number of creators and content supplied and magnitudes of viewers, advertisers, and revenues. I examine how the distribution of creator capabilities affects market concentration among creators and how it can be influenced by platform design. Tools for ad management and analytics are more impactful when the platform has sufficient content and viewers but has low ad demand. Conversely, reducing viewers’ distaste for ads through better matching and timing—which can create win–win–win effects throughout the ecosystem—is important when the platform has strong demand from advertisers. Platform infrastructure improvements that motivate creators to supply more content (e.g., development toolkits) must be chosen carefully to avoid creating higher concentration among a few powerful creators. Investments in first-party content are most consequential when the platform scale is small and when it has greater urgency to attract more viewers. I show that revenue sharing is (only partly) a tug of war between the platform and creators because a moderate sharing formula strengthens the overall ecosystem and profits of all participants. However, revenue-sharing tensions indicate a need to extend the one-rate-for-all creators approach with richer revenue-sharing arrangements that can better accommodate heterogeneity among creators.

Suggested Citation

  • Hemant K. Bhargava, 2022. "The Creator Economy: Managing Ecosystem Supply, Revenue Sharing, and Platform Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5233-5251, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:68:y:2022:i:7:p:5233-5251
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4126
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Subodha Kumar & Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Lai Wei, 2020. "When to Play Your Advertisement? Optimal Insertion Policy of Behavioral Advertisement," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 589-606, June.
    2. Sanjay Jain & Kun Qian, 2021. "Compensating Online Content Producers: A Theoretical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 7075-7090, November.
    3. Wilfred Amaldoss & Jinzhao Du & Woochoel Shin, 2021. "Media Platforms’ Content Provision Strategies and Sources of Profits," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 527-547, May-June.
    4. Peitz, Martin & Valletti, Tommaso M., 2008. "Content and advertising in the media: Pay-tv versus free-to-air," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 949-965, July.
    5. Gupta, Sunil, 2009. "Customer-Based Valuation," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 169-178.
    6. David Godes & Elie Ofek & Miklos Sarvary, 2009. "Content vs. Advertising: The Impact of Competition on Media Firm Strategy," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 20-35, 01-02.
    7. Evans David S., 2008. "The Economics of the Online Advertising Industry," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(3), pages 1-33, September.
    8. Yuewen Liu & Juan Feng, 2021. "Does Money Talk? The Impact of Monetary Incentives on User-Generated Content Contributions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 394-409, June.
    9. Emilio Calvano & Michele Polo, 2020. "Strategic Differentiation by Business Models: Free-To-Air and Pay-TV," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 130(625), pages 50-64.
    10. Adib Bagh & Hemant K. Bhargava, 2013. "How to Price Discriminate When Tariff Size Matters," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 111-126, August.
    11. Feng Zhu & Qihong Liu, 2018. "Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon.com," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(10), pages 2618-2642, October.
    12. Benjamin Shiller & Joel Waldfogel, 2013. "The Challenge Of Revenue Sharing With Bundled Pricing: An Application To Music," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 51(2), pages 1155-1165, April.
    13. Chrysanthos Dellarocas, 2012. "Double Marginalization in Performance-Based Advertising: Implications and Solutions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1178-1195, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wilfred Amaldoss & Jinzhao Du & Woochoel Shin, 2024. "Pricing Strategy of Competing Media Platforms," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 488-505, May.
    2. Meilin Gu & Dengpan Liu & Subodha Kumar, 2025. "Navigating Platform-Led Affiliate Marketing: Implications for Content Creation and Platform Profitability," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 802-827, June.
    3. Jingyan Li & Quan Zheng & Shichang Li & Jie Wu & Duo Shi, 2026. "Ad Blockers and Ad Quality," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 153-171, January.
    4. Li, Jingyan & Wu, Jie & Zhang, Juzhi & Ji, Xiang, 2024. "Freemium design: Optimal tier differentiation models for content platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Tommaso Bondi & Omid Rafieian & Yunfei (Jesse) Yao, 2026. "Privacy and Polarization: An Inference-Based Framework," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(2), pages 1389-1409, February.
    6. Zheyin (Jane) Gu & Xuying Zhao, 2024. "Content Length Limit: How Does It Matter for a Consumer-to-Consumer Media Platform?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1785-1801, December.
    7. Du, Siyu & Dong, Jiru & Li, Mingjun & Li, Shichang, 2025. "Originality vs. licensing: Optimal strategies of streaming platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    8. Qitian Ren, 2024. "Advertising and Content Creation on Digital Content Platforms," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 734-750, July.
    9. Simon P. Anderson & Bruno Jullien, 2015. "The advertising-financed business model in two-sided media markets," Post-Print hal-02866192, HAL.
    10. Bruno Jullien & Alessandro Pavan & Marc Rysman, 2021. "Two-sided markets, pricing, and network effects," Post-Print hal-03828345, HAL.
    11. Dong, Ruixiao & Guan, Xu & Han, Xiaohua & Jiang, Yuan, 2026. "Content moderation and creator incentives mechanism amidst controversial content surges," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    12. Anderson, Simon P. & Foros, Øystein & Kind, Hans Jarle, 2012. "Product quality, competition, and multi-purchasing," Discussion Papers 2012/9, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    13. Stühmeier Torben & Wenzel Tobias, 2012. "Regulating Advertising in the Presence of Public Service Broadcasting," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, June.
    14. Sun, Cheng, 2025. "Managing the advertising intensity: The role of the marginal disutility from advertising," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    15. Wilfred Amaldoss & Woochoel Shin, 2026. "Content Provision on UGC Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(2), pages 1489-1508, February.
    16. Levi DeValve & Saša Pekeč, 2022. "Optimal Price/Advertising Menus for Two-Sided Media Platforms," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(3), pages 1629-1645, May.
    17. Bian, Bei & Wang, Haiyan, 2025. "Quality management and feedback operation for user-generated content considering dynamic value belief," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 325(2), pages 344-361.
    18. Tommaso Bondi & Omid Rafieian, 2023. "Privacy and Polarization: An Inference-Based Approach," Working Papers 23-09, NET Institute.
    19. Christian Bach & Robert Edwards & Christian Jaag, 2023. "Postal Platform Pricing with Limited Consumer Attention," Working Papers 202318, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    20. Chutian Wang & Bo Zhou & Yogesh V. Joshi, 2024. "Endogenous Consumption and Metered Paywalls," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 158-177, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:68:y:2022:i:7:p:5233-5251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.