IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v36y2025i2p802-827.html

Navigating Platform-Led Affiliate Marketing: Implications for Content Creation and Platform Profitability

Author

Listed:
  • Meilin Gu

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Dengpan Liu

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Subodha Kumar

    (Statistics, Operations, and Data Science, Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122)

Abstract

Recently, some user-generated content (UGC) platforms have introduced shopping features to generate additional commission-based revenue from in-app transactions. These platforms allow creators to produce shoppable content, where promoted products are tagged with affiliate links, and in return, they earn a percentage of the commission the creators receive from merchants (such a new business model is referred to as platform-led affiliate marketing ). Despite its growing popularity, the impact of this business model on the key stakeholders (i.e., UGC platforms, content creators, and content consumers) has yet to be systematically analyzed in the existing literature. This paper aims to address this significant literature gap by employing a game-theoretic model. Our findings demonstrate that platform-led affiliate marketing can create a win-win situation for UGC platforms, creators participating in affiliate marketing, and content consumers. Furthermore, we find that even creators not participating in affiliate marketing can sometimes benefit indirectly from other creators’ participation. On the other hand, surprisingly, we find that UGC platforms may not necessarily benefit from adopting this emerging business model because of potential losses in traffic revenue. These results carry significant managerial implications for UGC platforms regarding whether and how to leverage affiliate marketing. Moreover, our findings suggest that creators may benefit from reducing their production efforts in the face of intensified competition. More importantly, optimal production decisions for creators can vary significantly, depending on specific factors (e.g., an increase in the number of creators or content substitutability) contributing to heightened competition. These findings offer valuable insights that can guide creators in refining their production strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Meilin Gu & Dengpan Liu & Subodha Kumar, 2025. "Navigating Platform-Led Affiliate Marketing: Implications for Content Creation and Platform Profitability," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 802-827, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:802-827
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2022.0620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.0620
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2022.0620?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanjay Jain & Kun Qian, 2021. "Compensating Online Content Producers: A Theoretical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 7075-7090, November.
    2. Yi-Chun (Chad) Ho & Yi-Jen (Ian) Ho & Yong Tan, 2017. "Online Cash-back Shopping: Implications for Consumers and e-Businesses," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 250-264, June.
    3. Nirvikar Singh & Xavier Vives, 1984. "Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 15(4), pages 546-554, Winter.
    4. Avinash Dixit, 1979. "A Model of Duopoly Suggesting a Theory of Entry Barriers," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(1), pages 20-32, Spring.
    5. Keran Zhao & Yingda Lu & Yuheng Hu & Yili Hong, 2023. "Direct and Indirect Spillovers from Content Providers’ Switching: Evidence from Online Livestreaming," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 847-866, September.
    6. Hemant K. Bhargava, 2022. "The Creator Economy: Managing Ecosystem Supply, Revenue Sharing, and Platform Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5233-5251, July.
    7. Alexandre De Cornière & Miklos Sarvary, 2023. "Social media news: content bundling and news quality," Post-Print hal-04067655, HAL.
    8. Wilfred Amaldoss & Jinzhao Du & Woochoel Shin, 2021. "Media Platforms’ Content Provision Strategies and Sources of Profits," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 527-547, May-June.
    9. Rakesh R. Mallipeddi & Subodha Kumar & Chelliah Sriskandarajah & Yunxia Zhu, 2022. "A Framework for Analyzing Influencer Marketing in Social Networks: Selection and Scheduling of Influencers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 75-104, January.
    10. Wilfred Amaldoss & Jinzhao Du & Woochoel Shin, 2021. "Media Platforms’ Content Provision Strategies and Sources of Profits," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 527-547, May.
    11. David Godes & Elie Ofek & Miklos Sarvary, 2009. "Content vs. Advertising: The Impact of Competition on Media Firm Strategy," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 20-35, 01-02.
    12. Alexandre de Cornière & Miklos Sarvary, 2023. "Social Media and News: Content Bundling and News Quality," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 162-178, January.
    13. Yuewen Liu & Juan Feng, 2021. "Does Money Talk? The Impact of Monetary Incentives on User-Generated Content Contributions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 394-409, June.
    14. Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang & Feng Zhu, 2011. "Group Size and Incentives to Contribute: A Natural Experiment at Chinese Wikipedia," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1601-1615, June.
    15. Krishnamurthy, Sandeep & Ou, Shaosong & Tripathi, Arvind K., 2014. "Acceptance of monetary rewards in open source software development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 632-644.
    16. Gordon Burtch & Qinglai He & Yili Hong & Dokyun Lee, 2022. "How Do Peer Awards Motivate Creative Content? Experimental Evidence from Reddit," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(5), pages 3488-3506, May.
    17. Jingchuan Pu & Yuan Chen & Liangfei Qiu & Hsing Kenneth Cheng, 2020. "Does Identity Disclosure Help or Hurt User Content Generation? Social Presence, Inhibition, and Displacement Effects," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 297-322, June.
    18. Naveen Kumar & Liangfei Qiu & Subodha Kumar, 2022. "A Hashtag Is Worth a Thousand Words: An Empirical Investigation of Social Media Strategies in Trademarking Hashtags," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1403-1427, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jingyan Li & Quan Zheng & Shichang Li & Jie Wu & Duo Shi, 2026. "Ad Blockers and Ad Quality," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 153-171, January.
    2. Du, Siyu & Dong, Jiru & Li, Mingjun & Li, Shichang, 2025. "Originality vs. licensing: Optimal strategies of streaming platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    3. Bian, Bei & Wang, Haiyan, 2025. "Quality management and feedback operation for user-generated content considering dynamic value belief," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 325(2), pages 344-361.
    4. Qitian Ren, 2024. "Advertising and Content Creation on Digital Content Platforms," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 734-750, July.
    5. Dong, Ruixiao & Guan, Xu & Han, Xiaohua & Jiang, Yuan, 2026. "Content moderation and creator incentives mechanism amidst controversial content surges," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Li, Jingyan & Wu, Jie & Zhang, Juzhi & Ji, Xiang, 2024. "Freemium design: Optimal tier differentiation models for content platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Zheyin (Jane) Gu & Xuying Zhao, 2024. "Content Length Limit: How Does It Matter for a Consumer-to-Consumer Media Platform?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1785-1801, December.
    8. Tommaso Bondi & Omid Rafieian & Yunfei (Jesse) Yao, 2026. "Privacy and Polarization: An Inference-Based Framework," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(2), pages 1389-1409, February.
    9. Shu, Lingli & Liang, Xuedong & Wu, Pengkun, 2026. "Values of private traffic for community group-buying platform: A game-theoretic model of subsidy strategy choice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    10. Lan Jiang, 2025. "Content provision strategy selection for a media platform in the presence of traffic revenue," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 3749-3782, October.
    11. Cai, Yajun & Wu, Yibin & Xue, Weili, 2024. "Social media retailing in the creator economy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    12. Wilfred Amaldoss & Jinzhao Du & Woochoel Shin, 2024. "Pricing Strategy of Competing Media Platforms," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 488-505, May.
    13. Levi DeValve & Saša Pekeč, 2022. "Optimal Price/Advertising Menus for Two-Sided Media Platforms," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(3), pages 1629-1645, May.
    14. Hemant K. Bhargava, 2022. "The Creator Economy: Managing Ecosystem Supply, Revenue Sharing, and Platform Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5233-5251, July.
    15. Dongcheng Zhang & Hanchen Jiang & Maoshan Qiang & Kunpeng Zhang & Liangfei Qiu, 2025. "Time to Stop? An Empirical Investigation on the Consequences of Canceling Monetary Incentives on a Digital Platform," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 781-801, June.
    16. Xinyu Li & Keongtae Kim, 2025. "Impacts of generative AI on user contributions: evidence from a coding Q &A platform," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 577-591, September.
    17. Chutian Wang & Bo Zhou & Yogesh V. Joshi, 2024. "Endogenous Consumption and Metered Paywalls," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 158-177, January.
    18. Wilfred Amaldoss & Woochoel Shin, 2026. "Content Provision on UGC Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(2), pages 1489-1508, February.
    19. Tommaso Bondi & Omid Rafieian, 2023. "Privacy and Polarization: An Inference-Based Approach," Working Papers 23-09, NET Institute.
    20. Xueyu Liu & Shue Mei & Weijun Zhong, 2024. "UGC creator's video‐generation and program‐participation decisions in the presence of ad‐revenue‐sharing programs," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(6), pages 4330-4349, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:802-827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.