IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v48y2002i7p866-885.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Performance Effects of Congruence Between Product Competitive Strategies and Purchasing Management Design

Author

Listed:
  • Julie Smith David

    (School of Accountancy and Information Management, College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-3606)

  • Yuhchang Hwang

    (School of Accountancy and Information Management, College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-3606)

  • Buck K. W. Pei

    (School of Accountancy and Information Management, College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-3606)

  • J. Hal Reneau

    (Formerly at the School of Accountancy and Information Management, College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-3606)

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine a performance contingency effect between product competitive strategy and organization design using an archival approach. Specifically, this study examines a sample of 194 firms from 20 industries based on the data collected by Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies (CAPS) in its benchmarking surveys between 1989-1994 and links the benchmarking data to the COMPUSTAT (Standard & Poor's) financial data of these firms. The results of the study reveal a contingency relationship among product competitive strategies, purchasing design characteristics, and overall firm financial performance (return on assets). Specifically, the nature of this contingency relationship suggests that a firm's product competitive strategy must be enabled with a complementary design in purchasing management to promote firm performance. Given the growing practice of benchmarking at the functional level, this study also examines whether or not a firm achieving a congruency in product strategy and design will necessarily enjoy higher operational efficiency at the purchasing management level. The results show that this is true only under specific conditions. The implications of the preceding findings are discussed accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie Smith David & Yuhchang Hwang & Buck K. W. Pei & J. Hal Reneau, 2002. "The Performance Effects of Congruence Between Product Competitive Strategies and Purchasing Management Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(7), pages 866-885, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:48:y:2002:i:7:p:866-885
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.48.7.866.2819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.7.866.2819
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.48.7.866.2819?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George P. Huber & C. Chet Miller & William H. Glick, 1990. "Developing More Encompassing Theories About Organizations: The Centralization-Effectiveness Relationship as an Example," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(1), pages 11-40, February.
    2. George P. Huber & Reuben R. McDaniel, 1986. "The Decision-Making Paradigm of Organizational Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 572-589, May.
    3. Arie Y. Lewin & John W. Minton, 1986. "Determining Organizational Effectiveness: Another Look, and an Agenda for Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 514-538, May.
    4. Stephen J. Kobrin, 1991. "An empirical analysis of the determinants of global integration," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(S1), pages 17-31, June.
    5. Henry Mintzberg, 1978. "Patterns in Strategy Formation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(9), pages 934-948, May.
    6. Rhonda K. Reger & Anne Sigismund Huff, 1993. "Strategic groups: A cognitive perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 103-123, February.
    7. Rebecca Henderson & Will Mitchell, 1997. "The Interactions Of Organizational And Competitive Influences On Strategy And Performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(S1), pages 5-14, July.
    8. -, 1986. "Agenda = Agenda," Series Históricas 8749, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    9. Thomas W. Malone, 1987. "Modeling Coordination in Organizations and Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(10), pages 1317-1332, October.
    10. George P. Huber, 1991. "Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 88-115, February.
    11. Craig Galbraith & Dan Schendel, 1983. "An empirical analysis of strategy types," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(2), pages 153-173, April.
    12. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F. & Nagar, Venkatesh & Rajan, Madhav V., 1999. "Supplier selection, monitoring practices, and firm performance," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 253-281, September.
    13. Suresh Kotha & Anil Nair, 1995. "Strategy and environment as determinants of performance: Evidence from the Japanese machine tool industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(7), pages 497-518.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pertusa-Ortega, Eva M. & Zaragoza-Sáez, Patrocinio & Claver-Cortés, Enrique, 2010. "Can formalization, complexity, and centralization influence knowledge performance?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 310-320, March.
    2. Church, Bryan K. & Kuang, Xi (Jason) & Liu, Yuebing (Sarah), 2019. "The effects of measurement basis and slack benefits on honesty in budget reporting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 74-84.
    3. Jaeyoung Cho & Jangwoo Lee, 2018. "Internationalization and performance of Korean SMEs: the moderating role of competitive strategy," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(2), pages 140-166, April.
    4. Lin, Chinho & Tsai, Hua-Ling & Wu, Ju-Chuan, 2014. "Collaboration strategy decision-making using the Miles and Snow typology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1979-1990.
    5. Sima Sabahi & Mahour M. Parast, 2023. "An operations and supply chain management perspective to product innovation," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 808-829, June.
    6. Max Boisot & Yan Li, 2005. "Codification, Abstraction, and Firm Differences: A Cognitive Information-based Perspective," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 309-334, December.
    7. Pan, Maomao & Bai, Min & Ren, Xiaoxiao, 2022. "Does internet convergence improve manufacturing enterprises’ competitive advantage? Empirical research based on the mediation effect model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    8. John W. Boudreau, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: Organizational Behavior, Strategy, Performance, and Design in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1463-1476, November.
    9. Godfrey Mugurusi & Lydia Bals, 2017. "A processual analysis of the purchasing and supply organization in transition: the impact of offshoring," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 64-83, June.
    10. Richard A. Schneible Jr & Neil Fargher, 2016. "Information transfer and firm-level strategy," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 56(4), pages 1119-1148, December.
    11. Tingyong Zhong & Fangcheng Sun & Haiyan Zhou & Jeoung Yul Lee, 2020. "Business Strategy, State-Owned Equity and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from Chinese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Yamakawa, Yasuhiro & Yang, Haibin & Lin, Zhiang (John), 2011. "Exploration versus exploitation in alliance portfolio: Performance implications of organizational, strategic, and environmental fit," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 287-296, March.
    13. Namryoung Lee & Jaehong Lee, 2019. "Differentiation Strategy, R&D Intensity, and Sustainability of Accounting Earnings: With a Focus on Biotech Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Sundar Bharadwaj & Anandhi Bharadwaj & Elliot Bendoly, 2007. "The Performance Effects of Complementarities Between Information Systems, Marketing, Manufacturing, and Supply Chain Processes," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 437-453, December.
    15. Balsam, Steven & Fernando, Guy D. & Tripathy, Arindam, 2011. "The impact of firm strategy on performance measures used in executive compensation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 187-193, February.
    16. Tian, Xiaowen & Slocum, John W., 2014. "What determines MNC subsidiary performance? Evidence from China," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 421-430.
    17. Fernando, Guy D. & Schneible, Richard A. & Tripathy, Arindam, 2016. "Firm strategy and market reaction to earnings," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 20-34.
    18. Guktae Kim & Moon-Goo Huh, 2015. "Exploration and organizational longevity: The moderating role of strategy and environment," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 389-414, June.
    19. Wu, Wan-Ting, 2014. "The forward E/P ratio and earnings growth," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 128-142.
    20. Ge Ren & Ping Zeng & Xi Zhong, 2024. "Differentiation strategies and firms' environmental, social and governance: The different moderating effects of historical and social performance shortfalls," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 719-740, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morgan, Robert E. & Strong, Carolyn A., 2003. "Business performance and dimensions of strategic orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 163-176, March.
    2. Jaime Gómez & Raquel Orcos & Henk W. Volberda, 2021. "How imitation of multiple reference groups drives the evolution of firm strategy," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(8), pages 2319-2350, November.
    3. Wrona, Thomas & Ladwig, Tina & Gunnesch, Markus, 2013. "Socio-cognitive processes in strategy formation – A conceptual framework," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 697-705.
    4. Waqar Ahmad Saleem Qazi, 2017. "Impact of Workforce Development on Organizational Effectiveness: Evidence from Pakistani Public-Sector Organizations," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 9(3), pages 123-154, September.
    5. Tammy E. Beck & Donde Ashmos Plowman, 2009. "Experiencing Rare and Unusual Events Richly: The Role of Middle Managers in Animating and Guiding Organizational Interpretation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 909-924, October.
    6. Kirn, Stefan, 1995. "Organisational intelligence and distributed AI," Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik 40, University of Münster, Department of Information Systems.
    7. Peters, Matt D. & Wieder, Bernhard & Sutton, Steve G. & Wakefield, James, 2016. "Business intelligence systems use in performance measurement capabilities: Implications for enhanced competitive advantage," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 1-17.
    8. Khavul, Susanna & Pérez-Nordtvedt, Liliana & Wood, Eric, 2010. "Organizational entrainment and international new ventures from emerging markets," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 104-119, January.
    9. Nagy, A., 2009. "Adoption of interorganizational information systems : The adoption position model," Other publications TiSEM af471297-bf03-43bf-88c1-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. repec:iim:iimawp:13106 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Da Mota de Pina E Cunha, A.M., 1998. "Determinants of Product Innovation in Organizations : Practices and Performance in the Portugese Financial Sector," Other publications TiSEM e6e4e56e-b72a-4392-8d79-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Kingshuk K. Sinha & Andrew H. Van de Ven, 2005. "Designing Work Within and Between Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 389-408, August.
    13. Bart Leten & Rene Belderbos & Bart Van Looy, 2016. "Entry and Technological Performance in New Technology Domains: Technological Opportunities, Technology Competition and Technological Relatedness," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(8), pages 1257-1291, December.
    14. Nerkar, Atul A. & McGrath, Rita Gunther & MacMillan, Ian C., 1996. "Three facets of satisfaction and their influence on the performance of innovation teams," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 167-188, May.
    15. Matthew J. Robson & Constantine S. Katsikeas & Daniel C. Bello, 2008. "Drivers and Performance Outcomes of Trust in International Strategic Alliances: The Role of Organizational Complexity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 647-665, August.
    16. Budhaditya Gupta & Tarun Khanna, 2019. "A Recombination-Based Internationalization Model: Evidence from Narayana Health’s Journey from India to the Cayman Islands," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 405-425, March.
    17. Day, Diana L. & Lewin, Arie Y. & Li, Hongyu, 1995. "Strategic leaders or strategic groups: A longitudinal data envelopment analysis of the U.S. brewing industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 619-638, February.
    18. Stefan Kirn, 1995. "Cooperative Knowledge Processing: The Key Technology for Future Organizations," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 4(4), pages 223-244, December.
    19. Bernardo P. Marques & Carlos F. Alves, 2020. "Using clustering ensemble to identify banking business models," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 66-94, April.
    20. Tzu-Hsin Liu & Yung-Chang Hsiao, 2019. "Fitting cooperative mode in inter-organizational strategic alliance: a perspective from innovative and financial performances," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 73-96, February.
    21. Glaister, Keith W. & Buckley, Peter J., 1998. "Management-performance relationships in UK joint ventures," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 235-257, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:48:y:2002:i:7:p:866-885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.