IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v11y2017i6p82.html

Identification and Ranking the Current Barriers in National Tax System (The Comprehensive Tax Plan)

Author

Listed:
  • Majid Shahmoradi
  • Hasan Atri.

Abstract

Tis study aims to identify and rank the obstacles found in the change of country tax system (tax comprehensive plan). In the first chapter, some questions have been raised and along them, some hypotheses are considered.The general questions of this study are- do environmental obstacles influence on successful implementing of tax comprehensive plan? Do organizational obstacles influence on successful implementation of tax comprehensive plan? Do behavioral obstacles influence on successful implementation of tax comprehensive plan?The method of this research is practical by purpose, and it is descriptive by data collection. Statistical population of this study is consisted of all of experts and managers of organization of country tax affairs and based on Cochran formula 106 people of personnel and manager of Tehran tax affairs and personnel in the building of tax comprehensive plan are selected as the sample. Considering the study literature, behavioral obstacles, environmental obstacles and organizational obstacles are evaluated and a questionnaire is designed based on mentioned variables with five scales of Likert with demographic variables. In this study, after preparing the study plan and studying and collecting its theoretic basics, two questionnaires are prepared for identifying and ranking the obstacles for study statistical sample and after distributing and gathering questionnaires, descriptive inferential statistics has been used for data analysis, and nonparametric test is used for hypothesis test. 10 of 13 hypotheses are proved and three of them failed to be proved which the proved results of this study are consistent with those of previous research ( about unproved hypotheses, they weren’t consistent, therefore, they can be examined for future research), then, through Friedman test, they are ranked as follows- 1- resistance of personnel against the change, 2- cultural factor, 3- behavioral factor, 4- lack professional workforce, 5- environmental factor 6- technological factor , 7- organizational factor, 8- lack of managers’ support, 9- technological factors (organizational), 10- domestic policy. Conclusion- considering the impact of cultural factor on the implementation of plan, it is recommended to include some pedagogic materials in textbooks of students and to make teaser ads and make animation and accomplishing education and expressing the importance of implementing the plan for general public, in order to promote a culture in this regard for all ages. Suggestions- In the current state budget and tax Civil Affairs with support at work and Parliament also about requiring all government agencies and non-governmental entities and financial and non-financial entities to submit information and supervision act.

Suggested Citation

  • Majid Shahmoradi & Hasan Atri., 2017. "Identification and Ranking the Current Barriers in National Tax System (The Comprehensive Tax Plan)," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(6), pages 1-82, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:11:y:2017:i:6:p:82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/68249/37000
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/68249
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Talvi, Ernesto & Vegh, Carlos A., 2005. "Tax base variability and procyclical fiscal policy in developing countries," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 156-190, October.
    2. Giesecke, James A. & Nhi, Tran Hoang, 2010. "Modelling value-added tax in the presence of multi-production and differentiated exemptions," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 156-173, April.
    3. Koedel, Cory & Mihaly, Kata & Rockoff, Jonah E., 2015. "Value-added modeling: A review," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 180-195.
    4. Liu, Qing & Lu, Yi, 2015. "Firm investment and exporting: Evidence from China's value-added tax reform," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 392-403.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D’Erasmo, P. & Mendoza, E.G. & Zhang, J., 2016. "What is a Sustainable Public Debt?," Handbook of Macroeconomics, in: J. B. Taylor & Harald Uhlig (ed.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 2493-2597, Elsevier.
    2. Aygun Garayeva & Gulzar Tahirova, 2017. "Government Spending Effectiveness and the Quality of Fiscal Institutions," Business & Management Compass, University of Economics Varna, issue 2, pages 128-143.
    3. Matthew A. Kraft & John P. Papay & Olivia L. Chi, 2020. "Teacher Skill Development: Evidence from Performance Ratings by Principals," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 315-347, March.
    4. Luca Agnello & Ricardo M. Sousa, 2009. "The Determinants of Public Deficit Volatility," NIPE Working Papers 11/2009, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    5. Folgar, Julian & García Posleman,Francisco, 2024. "Procyclical Fiscal Policy in Argentina : Drivers and Channels of a Long-Lasting Marriage," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10942, The World Bank.
    6. Majid Mohammed Kunambi & Hongxing Zheng, 2024. "Contextual Comparative Analysis of Dar es Salaam and Mombasa Port Performance by Using a Hybrid DEA(CVA) Model," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Eiji Fujii, 2024. "Currency concentration in sovereign debt, exchange rate cyclicality, and volatility in consumption," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 160(1), pages 169-192, February.
    8. Wichmann, Roberta Moreira & Portugal, Marcelo Savino, 2013. "Política Fiscal Assimétrica: O Caso do Brasil," Revista Brasileira de Economia - RBE, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil), vol. 67(3), September.
    9. Ghate, Chetan & Gopalakrishnan, Pawan & Tarafdar, Suchismita, 2016. "Fiscal policy in an emerging market business cycle model," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 14(PA), pages 52-77.
    10. Jia, Junyi & Chen, Jingwei & Yang, Yao, 2025. "Bond default of super-large real estate company and government debt risk," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Joachim Voth, 2013. "Tightening Tensions: Fiscal Policy and Civil Unrest in South America, 1937–95," Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies Book Series, in: Luis Felipe Céspedes & Jordi Galí (ed.),Fiscal Policy and Macroeconomic Performance, edition 1, volume 17, chapter 3, pages 59-92, Central Bank of Chile.
    12. Ardanaz, Martín & Izquierdo, Alejandro, 2017. "Current Expenditure Upswings in Good Times and Capital Expenditure Downswings in Bad Times?: New Evidence from Developing Countries," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 8558, Inter-American Development Bank.
    13. Sheremirov, Viacheslav & Spirovska, Sandra, 2022. "Fiscal multipliers in advanced and developing countries: Evidence from military spending," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    14. Ingo E. Isphording & Ulf Zölitz, 2020. "The value of a peer," ECON - Working Papers 342, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    15. Paul Anand & Jere R. Behrman & Hai-Anh H. Dang & Sam Jones, 2018. "Inequality of opportunity in education: Accounting for the contributions of Sibs, schools and sorting across East Africa," Working Papers 480, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    16. von Hippel, Paul T. & Bellows, Laura & Osborne, Cynthia & Lincove, Jane Arnold & Mills, Nick, 2016. "Teacher quality differences between teacher preparation programs: How big? How reliable? Which programs are different?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 31-45.
    17. Christian Hubert Ebeke, 2011. "Remittances, Countercyclicality, Openness and Government Size," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 77(4), pages 89-114.
    18. William B. Walstad & Jamie Wagner, 2016. "The disaggregation of value-added test scores to assess learning outcomes in economics courses," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 121-131, April.
    19. Fardoust, Shahrokh & Lin, Justin Yifu & Luo, Xubei, 2012. "Demystifying China's fiscal stimulus," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6221, The World Bank.
    20. Javier García-Cicco, 2010. "Estimating Models for Monetary Policy Analysis in Emerging Countries," Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 561, Central Bank of Chile.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:11:y:2017:i:6:p:82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.