IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jsd123/v14y2024i2p163.html

Does Egalitarian Democracy Boost Environmental Sustainability? An Empirical Test, 1970-2017

Author

Listed:
  • Amber Roeland
  • Indra de Soysa

Abstract

Many argue that the twin problems of poverty and environmental degradation are best addressed by adopting greater egalitarian processes of governance. Greater egalitarian societies apparently contain the required social trust and consensus for making hard choices and tradeoffs for achieving environmental gains. We employ novel data on egalitarian democracy, which measure the equal access of the poor to political power and societal resources, and data covering weak and strong sustainability measured by the “adjusted net savings” and several indicators of atmospheric pollution. The results suggest that greater egalitarian governance reduces weak sustainability and increases the intensity of climate-harming pollution. Regardless of democracy, other measures of social equity, such as the GINI and equal access to health and political resources, increase, not decrease, atmospheric pollution. These results are robust to estimating procedure, several alternative models, and data. While liberté, egalité and fraternité should be pursued for their own intrinsic value, meeting urgent challenges from global warming may require more targeted solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Amber Roeland & Indra de Soysa, 2024. "Does Egalitarian Democracy Boost Environmental Sustainability? An Empirical Test, 1970-2017," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(2), pages 163-163, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/download/0/0/44907/47513
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/view/0/44907
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pearce, David W. & Atkinson, Giles D., 1993. "Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of "weak" sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 103-108, October.
    2. Matthieu Clement & Andre Meunie, 2010. "Is Inequality Harmful for the Environment? An Empirical Analysis Applied to Developing and Transition Countries," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(4), pages 413-445.
    3. Peter Hess, 2010. "Determinants of the adjusted net saving rate in developing economies," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 591-608.
    4. Qasim,Mubashir & Grimes, Arthur, 2018. "Sustainable economic policy and well-being: The relationship between adjusted net savings and subjective well-being," Motu Working Papers 290505, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    5. Wenar, Leif, 2016. "Blood Oil: Tyrants, Violence, and the Rules That Run the World," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780190262921.
    6. Scruggs, Lyle A., 1998. "Political and economic inequality and the environment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 259-275, September.
    7. Daniel Hoechle, 2007. "Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 7(3), pages 281-312, September.
    8. John C. Driscoll & Aart C. Kraay, 1998. "Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation With Spatially Dependent Panel Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 80(4), pages 549-560, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Indra de Soysa, 2022. "Economic freedom vs. egalitarianism: An empirical test of weak & strong sustainability, 1970–2017," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 236-268, May.
    2. Indra Soysa & Espen Moe & Simen Rostad Saether, 2025. "Egalitarian governance and the green energy transition: an empirical test of 46 industrial economies, 1990–2020," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 16983-17004, July.
    3. de Soysa, Indra, 2025. "Green with envy? The effects of inequality and equity within and across social groups on greenhouse gas emissions, 1990–2020," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Njamen Kengdo Arsène Aurelien & Nchofoung Tii N. & Kos A Mougnol Alice, 2023. "Determinants of Military Spending in Africa: Do Institutions Matter?," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 29(4), pages 401-440, December.
    5. Chiroleu-Assouline, Mireille & Fodha, Mouez & Kirat, Yassine, 2020. "Carbon curse in developed countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Gozgor, Giray & Li, Jing & Saleem, Irfan & Shinwari, Riazullah, 2025. "The impact of women's political empowerment on renewable energy demand: Evidence from OECD countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Robert Lehmann, 2016. "Economic Growth and Business Cycle Forecasting at the Regional Level," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 65, October.
    8. Broto, Carmen & Díaz-Cassou, Javier & Erce, Aitor, 2011. "Measuring and explaining the volatility of capital flows to emerging countries," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1941-1953, August.
    9. Zhang, Chuanguo & Zhao, Wei, 2014. "Panel estimation for income inequality and CO2 emissions: A regional analysis in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 382-392.
    10. Luis Enrique Rojas Ramírez & Alejandro Molina Vargas, 2018. "Public infrastructure and its importance for economic growth: the case of Oaxaca (Mexico)," Revista Ecos de Economía, Universidad EAFIT, vol. 22(46), pages 4-27.
    11. Thai-Ha Le & Youngho Chang & Donghyun Park, 2016. "Governance, Vulnerability to Climate Change, and Green Growth: International Evidence," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 500, Asian Development Bank.
    12. Christopher L. Foote, 2007. "Space and time in macroeconomic panel data: young workers and state-level unemployment revisited," Working Papers 07-10, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    13. Mariia Shkolnykova & Lasse Steffens & Jan Wedemeier, 2024. "Systems of innovation: Path of economic transition and differences in institutions in central and Eastern Europe?," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), March.
    14. Serafín Frache & Rodrigo Lluberas, 2017. "New information and inflation expectations among firms," Documentos de trabajo 2017013, Banco Central del Uruguay.
    15. Izaskun Zuazu, 2023. "Structural Change and Gender Sectoral Segregation in Sub-Saharan Africa," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_1027, Levy Economics Institute.
    16. Dobdinga C. Fonchamnyo & Etoh-Anzah P. Angyie & Nges S. Afumbom & Gildas D. Dinga & Simplice A. Asongu, 2022. "Structural Change, Environmental Pollution and Health Expenditure: Evidence from a Global Panel," Journal of Africa SEER Centre(ASC) 22/004, Africa SEER Centre(ASC).
    17. G. Kent Fellows, 2022. "Pipes, Trains and Automobiles: Explaining British Columbia’s High Wholesale Gasoline Prices," The Energy Journal, , vol. 43(5), pages 139-160, September.
    18. Chimere O. Iheonu, 2019. "Governance and Domestic Investment in Africa," Working Papers 19/001, European Xtramile Centre of African Studies (EXCAS).
    19. Mohammad Mafizur Rahman & Khosrul Alam, 2022. "CO 2 Emissions in Asia–Pacific Region: Do Energy Use, Economic Growth, Financial Development, and International Trade Have Detrimental Effects?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    20. Ayhan, Fatih & Elal, Onuray, 2023. "The IMPACTS of technological change on employment: Evidence from OECD countries with panel data analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.