IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijefaa/v17y2025i6p14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Real Wage Rigidity and the Empirical Pertinence of the Hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve in Tunisia

Author

Listed:
  • Mariem Mejri
  • Moez Labidi

Abstract

By incorporating real wage rigidity, the Hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve (HNKPC) developed by Blanchard and Galí (2007) provides a relevant framework for analysing inflation dynamics and the effects of monetary policies, particularly in a globalised economy. This study assesses its empirical validity in Tunisia by examining the relationship between inflation, unemployment, and output in both the short and long run, using the Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) and a calibration technique. The findings confirm the relevance of this model for the Tunisian economy, highlighting the central role of adaptive expectations in current inflation dynamics. They also reveal a short-term trade-off between inflation and the welfare-relevant output gap, as well as between inflation and unemployment, whereas in the long run, this trade-off disappears, in line with theoretical predictions. The magnitude of these trade-offs is positively correlated with the degree of real wage rigidity, estimated at approximately 95% due to the structure of the Tunisian labour market. These results underscore the importance of structural reforms to enhance the effectiveness of monetary policies and foster a more robust economic trajectory.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariem Mejri & Moez Labidi, 2025. "Real Wage Rigidity and the Empirical Pertinence of the Hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve in Tunisia," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(6), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/download/0/0/51632/56139
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/0/51632
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hansen, Lars Peter, 1982. "Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 1029-1054, July.
    2. Olivier Blanchard & Jordi Galí, 2007. "Real Wage Rigidities and the New Keynesian Model," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 39(s1), pages 35-65, February.
    3. Agénor, Pierre-Richard & Bayraktar, Nihal, 2010. "Contracting models of the Phillips curve empirical estimates for middle-income countries," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 555-570, June.
    4. Kydland, Finn E & Prescott, Edward C, 1982. "Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(6), pages 1345-1370, November.
    5. Imen Kobbi & Foued-Badr Gabsi, 2017. "The Nonlinearity of the New Keynesian Phillips Curve: The Case of Tunisia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberto González & Hector Sala, 2015. "The Frisch Elasticity in the Mercosur Countries: A Pseudo-Panel Approach," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 33(1), pages 107-131, January.
    2. Carlos Medel, 2017. "Forecasting Chilean inflation with the hybrid new keynesian Phillips curve: globalisation, combination, and accuracy," Journal Economía Chilena (The Chilean Economy), Central Bank of Chile, vol. 20(3), pages 004-050, December.
    3. Lucas, Robert E, Jr, 1996. "Nobel Lecture: Monetary Neutrality," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 104(4), pages 661-682, August.
    4. Kris Jacobs, 2001. "Estimating Nonseparable Preference Specifications for Asset Market Participants," CIRANO Working Papers 2001s-12, CIRANO.
    5. Martial Dupaigne & Patrick Feve & Julien Matheron, 2007. "Technology Shocks, Non-stationary Hours and DSVAR," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 10(2), pages 238-255, April.
    6. Martial Dupaigne & Patrick F ve & Julien Matheron, 2005. "Technology Shock and Employment: Do We Really Need DSGE Models with a Fall in Hours?," Working papers 124, Banque de France.
    7. Dunn, Kenneth B. & Singleton, Kenneth J., 1986. "Modeling the term structure of interest rates under non-separable utility and durability of goods," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 27-55, September.
    8. Barros, Geraldo Sant’Ana de Camargo & Carrara, Aniela Fagundes & Castro, Nicole Rennó & Silva, Adriana Ferreira, 2022. "Agriculture and inflation: Expected and unexpected shocks," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 178-188.
    9. Lilia Maliar & Serguei Maliar, 2004. "Preference shocks from aggregation: time series data evidence," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 37(3), pages 768-781, August.
    10. Adam Hale Shapiro, 2008. "Estimating the New Keynesian Phillips Curve: A Vertical Production Chain Approach," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(4), pages 627-666, June.
    11. Imen Kobbi & Foued-Badr Gabsi, 2017. "The Nonlinearity of the New Keynesian Phillips Curve: The Case of Tunisia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-12, July.
    12. Igor Vetlov & Tibor Hlédik & Magnus Jonsson & Henrik Kucsera & Massimiliano Pisani, 2011. "Potential Output in DSGE Models," Bank of Lithuania Working Paper Series 9, Bank of Lithuania.
    13. Raquel Carrasco & Jose M. Labeaga & J.David López-Salido, 2002. "Unobserved Heterogeneity and Intertemporal Nonseparability: Evidence from Consumption Panel Data," 10th International Conference on Panel Data, Berlin, July 5-6, 2002 C4-4, International Conferences on Panel Data.
    14. Sungbae An & Yongsung Chang & Sun-Bin Kim, 2009. "Can a Representative-Agent Model Represent a Heterogeneous-Agent Economy," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 1(2), pages 29-54, July.
    15. Yongquan Cao & Grey Gordon, 2019. "A Practical Approach to Testing Calibration Strategies," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 1165-1182, March.
    16. Mazali, Antonio Alberto & Divino, Jose Angelo, 2010. "Real Wage Rigidity and the New Phillips Curve: The Brazilian Case," Revista Brasileira de Economia - RBE, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil), vol. 64(3), September.
    17. Mont'Alverne Duarte, Angelo & Gaglianone, Wagner Piazza & de Carvalho Guillén, Osmani Teixeira & Issler, João Victor, 2021. "Commodity prices and global economic activity: A derived-demand approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    18. MAO TAKONGMO, Charles Olivier, 2019. "Keynesian Models, Detrending, and the Method of Moments," MPRA Paper 91709, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Lars Peter Hansen & James J. Heckman, 1996. "The Empirical Foundations of Calibration," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 10(1), pages 87-104, Winter.
    20. Jacobs, Kris, 2000. "Estimating Nonseparable Preference Specifications for Asset Market Participants," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1472, Econometric Society.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.