IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i8p10534-10553d53795.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Urban Road Congestion Pricing Strategy Considering Carbon Dioxide Emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Yitian Wang

    (Transportation Management College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Zixuan Peng

    (Transportation Management College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Keming Wang

    (Transportation Management College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Xiaolin Song

    (Transportation Management College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Baozhen Yao

    (School of Automotive Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Tao Feng

    (Urban Planning Group, Department of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, Vertigo 8.16, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Congestion pricing strategy has been recognized as an effective countermeasure in the practical field of urban traffic congestion mitigation. In this paper, a bi-level programming model considering carbon dioxide emission is proposed to mitigate traffic congestion and reduce carbon dioxide emissions. The objective function of the upper level model is to minimize the sum of travel costs and the carbon dioxide emissions costs. The lower level is a multi-modal transportation network equilibrium model. To solve the model, the method of successive averages (MSA) and the shuffled frog leaping algorithm (SFLA) are introduced. The proposed method and algorithm are tested through the numerical example. The results show that the proposed congestion pricing strategy can mitigate traffic congestion and reduce carbon emissions effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Yitian Wang & Zixuan Peng & Keming Wang & Xiaolin Song & Baozhen Yao & Tao Feng, 2015. "Research on Urban Road Congestion Pricing Strategy Considering Carbon Dioxide Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:8:p:10534-10553:d:53795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/8/10534/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/8/10534/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ubeda, S. & Arcelus, F.J. & Faulin, J., 2011. "Green logistics at Eroski: A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 44-51, May.
    2. Anna Nagurney, 2000. "Sustainable Transportation Networks," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2069.
    3. Verhoef, Erik T., 2002. "Second-best congestion pricing in general static transportation networks with elastic demands," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 281-310, May.
    4. Peter Bickel & Rainer Friedrich & Heike Link & Louise Stewart & Chris Nash, 2005. "Introducing Environmental Externalities into Transport Pricing: Measurement and Implications," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 389-415, November.
    5. Wie, Byung-Wook & Tobin, Roger L., 1998. "Dynamic congestion pricing models for general traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 313-327, June.
    6. Li, Hongqi & Lu, Yue & Zhang, Jun & Wang, Tianyi, 2013. "Trends in road freight transportation carbon dioxide emissions and policies in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 99-106.
    7. F. H. Knight, 1924. "Some Fallacies in the Interpretation of Social Cost," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 38(4), pages 582-606.
    8. Ian W. H. Parry & Margaret Walls & Winston Harrington, 2007. "Automobile Externalities and Policies," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 45(2), pages 373-399, June.
    9. Stella C. Dafermos, 1973. "Toll Patterns for Multiclass-User Transportation Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 211-223, August.
    10. Arnott, Richard & de Palma, Andre & Lindsey, Robin, 1999. "Information and time-of-usage decisions in the bottleneck model with stochastic capacity and demand," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 525-548, March.
    11. Yang, Hai & Huang, Hai-Jun, 1998. "Principle of marginal-cost pricing: how does it work in a general road network?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 45-54, January.
    12. Sang Nguyen & Clermont Dupuis, 1984. "An Efficient Method for Computing Traffic Equilibria in Networks with Asymmetric Transportation Costs," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 185-202, May.
    13. Macharis, Cathy & Van Hoeck, Ellen & Pekin, Ethem & van Lier, Tom, 2010. "A decision analysis framework for intermodal transport: Comparing fuel price increases and the internalisation of external costs," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 550-561, August.
    14. Yang, Hai & Hai-Jun, Huang, 1997. "Analysis of the time-varying pricing of a bottleneck with elastic demand using optimal control theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 425-440, November.
    15. Jean-Pierre Nicolas & Damien David, 2009. "Passenger transport and CO2 emissions: What does the French transport survey tell us?," Post-Print halshs-00372439, HAL.
    16. Yildirim, Mehmet Bayram & Hearn, Donald W., 2005. "A first best toll pricing framework for variable demand traffic assignment problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 659-678, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamad Shatanawi & Fatma Abdelkhalek & Ferenc Mészáros, 2020. "Urban Congestion Charging Acceptability: An International Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Meng Li & Guowei Hua & Haijun Huang, 2018. "A Multi-Modal Route Choice Model with Ridesharing and Public Transit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Shatanawi, Mohamad & Alatawneh, Anas & Mészáros, Ferenc, 2022. "Implications of static and dynamic road pricing strategies in the era of autonomous and shared autonomous vehicles using simulation-based dynamic traffic assignment: The case of Budapest," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    4. Linfeng Li & Miyuan Shan, 2016. "Bidirectional Incentive Model for Bicycle Redistribution of a Bicycle Sharing System during Rush Hour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Shahriar Afandizadeh & Seyed Ebrahim Abdolmanafi, 2016. "Development of a Model for a Cordon Pricing Scheme Considering Environmental Equity: A Case Study of Tehran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Mohamad Shatanawi & Mohammed Hajouj & Belal Edries & Ferenc Mészáros, 2022. "The Interrelationship between Road Pricing Acceptability and Self-Driving Vehicle Adoption: Insights from Four Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-32, October.
    7. Yibin Ao & Chuan Chen & Dujuan Yang & Yan Wang, 2018. "Relationship between Rural Built Environment and Household Vehicle Ownership: An Empirical Analysis in Rural Sichuan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Marazi, Naveed Farooz & Majumdar, Bandhan Bandhu & Sahu, Prasanta K. & Potoglou, Dimitris, 2022. "Congestion pricing acceptability among commuters: An Indian perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. C. Robin Lindsey & Erik T. Verhoef, 2000. "Traffic Congestion and Congestion Pricing," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 00-101/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    2. de Palma, André & Kilani, Moez & Lindsey, Robin, 2005. "Congestion pricing on a road network: A study using the dynamic equilibrium simulator METROPOLIS," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(7-9), pages 588-611.
    3. Dung-Ying Lin & Avinash Unnikrishnan & S. Waller, 2011. "A Dual Variable Approximation Based Heuristic for Dynamic Congestion Pricing," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 271-293, June.
    4. Ren-Yong Guo & Hai Yang & Hai-Jun Huang & Zhijia Tan, 2016. "Day-to-Day Flow Dynamics and Congestion Control," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 982-997, August.
    5. Coria, Jessica & Bonilla, Jorge & Grundström, Maria & Pleijel, Håkan, 2015. "Air pollution dynamics and the need for temporally differentiated road pricing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 178-195.
    6. Verhoef, Erik T. & Koh, Andrew & Shepherd, Simon, 2010. "Pricing, capacity and long-run cost functions for first-best and second-best network problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 870-885, August.
    7. Bin Yu & Liu Zhang & Feng Guan & Zixuan Peng & Baozhen Yao, 2017. "Equity based congestion pricing: considering the constraint of alternative path," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 313-337, April.
    8. Zhang, H. M. & Ge, Y. E., 2004. "Modeling variable demand equilibrium under second-best road pricing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 733-749, September.
    9. Prateek Bansal & Rohan Shah & Stephen D. Boyles, 2018. "Robust network pricing and system optimization under combined long-term stochasticity and elasticity of travel demand," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1389-1418, September.
    10. Miralinaghi, Mohammad & Peeta, Srinivas, 2016. "Multi-period equilibrium modeling planning framework for tradable credit schemes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 177-198.
    11. Kathrin Goldmann & Gernot Sieg, 2018. "Economic implications of phantom traffic jams: Evidence from traffic experiments," Working Papers 26, Institute of Transport Economics, University of Muenster.
    12. Li, Tongfei & Sun, Huijun & Wu, Jianjun & Ge, Ying-en, 2017. "Optimal toll of new highway in the equilibrium framework of heterogeneous households' residential location choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 123-137.
    13. Tillema, Taede & Ben-Elia, Eran & Ettema, Dick & van Delden, Janet, 2013. "Charging versus rewarding: A comparison of road-pricing and rewarding peak avoidance in the Netherlands," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 4-14.
    14. Terry E. Daniel & Eyran J. Gisches & Amnon Rapoport, 2009. "Departure Times in Y-Shaped Traffic Networks with Multiple Bottlenecks," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(5), pages 2149-2176, December.
    15. Qixiu Cheng & Zhiyuan Liu & Feifei Liu & Ruo Jia, 2017. "Urban dynamic congestion pricing: an overview and emerging research needs," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(0), pages 3-18, August.
    16. Bergeaud, Antonin & Raimbault, Juste, 2020. "An empirical analysis of the spatial variability of fuel prices in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 131-143.
    17. Loukas Dimitriou & Theodore Tsekeris, 2009. "Evolutionary game-theoretic model for dynamic congestion pricing in multi-class traffic networks," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 103-121, April.
    18. Winston, Clifford & Yan, Jia, 2011. "Can privatization of U.S. highways improve motorists' welfare?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 993-1005.
    19. Kenneth Small, 2015. "The Bottleneck Model: An Assessment and Interpretation," Working Papers 141506, University of California-Irvine, Department of Economics.
    20. Kockelman, Kara M. & Kalmanje, Sukumar, 2005. "Credit-based congestion pricing: a policy proposal and the public's response," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(7-9), pages 671-690.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:8:p:10534-10553:d:53795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.