IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3151-d1626723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Endogenous Direction Selection Mechanism for the Direction Distance Function Method Applied to Different Economic–Environmental Development Modes

Author

Listed:
  • Junchao Wang

    (The Higher Educational Key Laboratory for Flexible Manufacturing Equipment Integration of Fujian Province, Xiamen Institute of Technology, Xiamen 361021, China)

  • Jun-Hong Ye

    (Digital Intelligence Management Research Institute, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Zhejiang College, Jinhua 321015, China)

  • Lei Chen

    (School of Economics & Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

Abstract

As a direction selection in the direction distance function (DDF), endogenous DDF can accurately reflect the numerical characteristics of inputs/outputs, but it is difficult to effectively popularize. And it is also difficult to effectively combine with reality. To solve those problems, this paper introduces slack variables to construct a new endogenous direction-setting mechanism, which makes the endogenous model have the conditions to be popularized. Based on the original endogenous DDF, we consider environmental concern, economic concern, coordinated development, and priority development, and then construct six new extended DDF models with slack variables. Based on priority development, we further propose six new extended DDF models. These new extended models can not only realize the complete internalization of direction determination but also overcome the limitations of traditional endogenous models. Combined with the actual case, the emission reduction potential of different areas is revealed, and the improved path is proposed. The results show that the new extended DDF models effectively reflect the different development modes of carbon emissions, and different development modes have a significant impact on emission reduction potential. In addition, compared with economic concern and priority development, coordinated development and environmental concern are most beneficial to carbon emission reduction, but the development mode of environmental concern can better reveal the improved path of environmental development.

Suggested Citation

  • Junchao Wang & Jun-Hong Ye & Lei Chen, 2025. "A New Endogenous Direction Selection Mechanism for the Direction Distance Function Method Applied to Different Economic–Environmental Development Modes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-26, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3151-:d:1626723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3151/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3151/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbero, Javier & Zofío, José L., 2023. "The measurement of profit, profitability, cost and revenue efficiency through data envelopment analysis: A comparison of models using BenchmarkingEconomicEfficiency.jl," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Krüger, Jens & Hampf, Benjamin, 2015. "Optimal Directions for Directional Distance Functions: An Exploration of Potential Reductions of Greenhouse Gases," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 77007, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Gulati, Rachita, 2022. "Global and local banking crises and risk-adjusted efficiency of Indian banks: Are the impacts really perspective-dependent?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 23-39.
    4. Kaneko, Shinji & Fujii, Hidemichi & Sawazu, Naoya & Fujikura, Ryo, 2010. "Financial allocation strategy for the regional pollution abatement cost of reducing sulfur dioxide emissions in the thermal power sector in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2131-2141, May.
    5. Benjamin Hampf & Jens J. Krüger, 2015. "Optimal Directions for Directional Distance Functions: An Exploration of Potential Reductions of Greenhouse Gases," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(3), pages 920-938.
    6. Liang, Liang & Wu, Jie & Cook, Wade D. & Zhu, Joe, 2008. "Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 1025-1030, June.
    7. Xu, Guangcheng & Wu, Jie & Zhu, Qingyuan & Pan, Yinghao, 2024. "Fixed cost allocation based on data envelopment analysis from inequality aversion perspectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(1), pages 281-295.
    8. Fare, Rolf, 1989. "Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs Are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 71(1), pages 90-98, February.
    9. Nepomuceno, Thyago C.C. & Agasisti, Tommaso & Bertoletti, Alice & Daraio, Cinzia, 2024. "Multicriteria panel-data directional distances and the efficiency measurement of multidimensional higher education systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    10. Pittman, Russell W, 1983. "Multilateral Productivity Comparisons with Undesirable Outputs," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 93(372), pages 883-891, December.
    11. M.D. Troutt, 1997. "Derivation of the Maximin Efficiency Ratio model from the maximum decisional efficiency principle," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 73(0), pages 323-338, October.
    12. Wang, Ailun & Hu, Shuo & Li, Jianglong, 2022. "Using machine learning to model technological heterogeneity in carbon emission efficiency evaluation: The case of China's cities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    13. Ma, Chunbo & Hailu, Atakelty & You, Chaoying, 2019. "A critical review of distance function based economic research on China’s marginal abatement cost of carbon dioxide emissions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    14. R. G. Chambers & Y. Chung & R. Färe, 1998. "Profit, Directional Distance Functions, and Nerlovian Efficiency," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 98(2), pages 351-364, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Du, Limin & Lu, Yunguo & Ma, Chunbo, 2022. "Carbon efficiency and abatement cost of China's coal-fired power plants," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Aparicio, Juan & Kapelko, Magdalena & Zofío, José L., 2020. "The measurement of environmental economic inefficiency with pollution-generating technologies," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Soledad Moya & Jordi Perramon & Anselm Constans, 2005. "IFRS Adoption in Europe: The Case of Germany," Working Papers 0501, Departament Empresa, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, revised Feb 2005.
    4. Dakpo, K Hervé & Lansink, Alfons Oude, 2019. "Dynamic pollution-adjusted inefficiency under the by-production of bad outputs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 202-211.
    5. Cherchye, Laurens & De Rock, Bram & Walheer, Barnabé, 2016. "Multi-output profit efficiency and directional distance functions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 100-109.
    6. Jindal, Abhinav & Nilakantan, Rahul & Sinha, Avik, 2024. "CO2 emissions abatement costs and drivers for Indian thermal power industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Arnaud Abad & Paola Ravelojaona, 2021. "Pollution‐adjusted productivity analysis: The use of Malmquist and Luenberger productivity measures," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(3), pages 635-648, April.
    8. Moriah Bostian & Rolf Färe & Shawna Grosskopf & Tommy Lundgren, 2022. "Prevention or cure? Optimal abatement mix," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 24(4), pages 503-531, October.
    9. Manh D. Pham & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2017. "Convexity, Disposability and Returns to Scale in Production Analysis," CEPA Working Papers Series WP042017, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    10. Wang, Ke & Wei, Yi-Ming & Huang, Zhimin, 2016. "Potential gains from carbon emissions trading in China: A DEA based estimation on abatement cost savings," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 48-59.
    11. Vardanyan, Michael & Valdmanis, Vivian G. & Leleu, Hervé & Ferrier, Gary D., 2022. "Estimating technology characteristics of the U.S. hospital industry using directional distance functions with optimal directions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    12. Benjamin Hampf, 2018. "Measuring inefficiency in the presence of bad outputs: Does the disposability assumption matter?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 101-127, February.
    13. Beltrán-Esteve, Mercedes & Picazo-Tadeo, Andrés J., 2017. "Assessing environmental performance in the European Union: Eco-innovation versus catching-up," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 240-252.
    14. Yang, Jun & Cheng, Jixin & Zou, Ran & Geng, Zhifei, 2021. "Industrial SO2 technical efficiency, reduction potential and technology heterogeneities of China's prefecture-level cities: A multi-hierarchy meta-frontier parametric approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    15. Andrés J. Picazo-Tadeo & Diego Prior, 2005. "Efficiency and Environmental Regulation: A "Complex Situation"," Working Papers 0502, Departament Empresa, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, revised Feb 2005.
    16. Atkinson, Scott E. & Primont, Daniel & Tsionas, Mike G., 2018. "Statistical inference in efficient production with bad inputs and outputs using latent prices and optimal directions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 204(2), pages 131-146.
    17. Harald Dyckhoff & Rainer Souren, 2023. "Are important phenomena of joint production still being neglected by economic theory? A review of recent literature," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1015-1053, August.
    18. Song, Malin & Wang, Jianlin, 2018. "Environmental efficiency evaluation of thermal power generation in China based on a slack-based endogenous directional distance function model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 325-336.
    19. Atkinson, Scott E. & Dorfman, Jeffrey H., 2005. "Bayesian measurement of productivity and efficiency in the presence of undesirable outputs: crediting electric utilities for reducing air pollution," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 445-468, June.
    20. Scott E. Atkinson & Mike G. Tsionas, 2018. "Shadow directional distance functions with bads: GMM estimation of optimal directions and efficiencies," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 207-230, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3151-:d:1626723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.