IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2750-d1616177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ESG Controversies and Firm Value: Evidence from A-Share Companies in China

Author

Listed:
  • Shijin Ma

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Tao Ma

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
    Shanghai Key Laboratory of Policy Simulation and Assessment for Ecology and Environment Governance, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

Firm value reflects a company’s market competitiveness, while ESG controversies indicate its ESG risks. This study aims to examine the impact of ESG controversies on firm value and its underlying mechanisms. Using a panel dataset of 851 non-financial firms listed in China’s A-share market between 2010 and 2022, this study investigates the relationship between ESG controversies and firm value using a two-way fixed-effects model. The analysis shows that ESG controversies impair firm value. This relationship remains robust after conducting the Heckman test, 2SLS methods, and heteroskedasticity tests. Further mediation analysis indicates that ESG controversies negatively affect firm value through lower levels of green innovation, total factor productivity, and financing constraints. In addition, the study examines the moderating effects of social performance, environmental performance, and analyst forecast bias. Finally, a heterogeneity analysis was conducted. These findings provide new perspectives for understanding the complex dynamics between ESG controversies and firm value, essential for strengthening the ESG rating framework and promoting sustainable corporate development.

Suggested Citation

  • Shijin Ma & Tao Ma, 2025. "ESG Controversies and Firm Value: Evidence from A-Share Companies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2750-:d:1616177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2750/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2750/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simona Galletta & Sebastiano Mazzù, 2023. "ESG controversies and bank risk taking," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 274-288, January.
    2. Dimitrios Pesmatzoglou & Ioannis E. Nikolaou & Konstantinos I. Evangelinos & Stuart Allan, 2014. "Extractive Multinationals And Corporate Social Responsibility: A Commitment Towards Achieving The Goals Of Sustainable Development Or Only A Management Strategy?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 187-206, March.
    3. Wu, Zihao & Lin, Siliang & Chen, Tianhao & Luo, Chunyang & Xu, Hui, 2023. "Does effective corporate governance mitigate the negative effect of ESG controversies on firm value?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1772-1793.
    4. Miyazawa, Kensuke, 2012. "Capital utilization in Japan's lost decade: A neoclassical interpretation," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 246-253.
    5. Pan, Wenrong & Xie, Tao & Wang, Zhuwang & Ma, Lisha, 2022. "Digital economy: An innovation driver for total factor productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 303-311.
    6. Ahmed A. Elamer & Mounia Boulhaga, 2024. "ESG controversies and corporate performance: The moderating effect of governance mechanisms and ESG practices," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3312-3327, July.
    7. Henri Servaes & Ane Tamayo, 2013. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Value: The Role of Customer Awareness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1045-1061, May.
    8. Grace Il Joo Kang & Kyongsun Heo & Sungmin Jeon, 2024. "A comparison of analysts’ and investors’ information efficiency of corporate social responsibility activities," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(2), pages 547-572, January.
    9. Li, Jialong & Haider, Zulfiquer Ali & Jin, Xianzhe & Yuan, Wenlong, 2019. "Corporate controversy, social responsibility and market performance: International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1-18.
    10. Christian Espinosa-Méndez & Carlos P. Maquieira & José T. Arias, 2023. "The Impact of ESG Performance on the Value of Family Firms: The Moderating Role of Financial Constraints and Agency Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Xin Jin & Xue Lei, 2023. "A Study on the Mechanism of ESG’s Impact on Corporate Value under the Concept of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Nirino, Niccolò & Santoro, Gabriele & Miglietta, Nicola & Quaglia, Roberto, 2021. "Corporate controversies and company's financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    13. Fama, Eugene F, 1980. "Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 88(2), pages 288-307, April.
    14. Ren, Xiaohang & Zhang, Xiao & Yan, Cheng & Gozgor, Giray, 2022. "Climate policy uncertainty and firm-level total factor productivity: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    15. Jose Benitez & Laura Ruiz & Ana Castillo & Javier Llorens, 2020. "How corporate social responsibility activities influence employer reputation: The role of social media capability," Post-Print hal-02462583, HAL.
    16. Danni Chen & Xue Chen & Xiaoling Pu & Hao Luo, 2020. "Disputes over Corporate Control at Chinese Firms," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 894-912, March.
    17. Ammar Ali Gull & Asif Saeed & Muhammad Tahir Suleman & Rizwan Mushtaq, 2022. "Revisiting the association between environmental performance and financial performance: Does the level of environmental orientation matter?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1647-1662, September.
    18. Maximilian J. L. Schormair & Lara M. Gerlach, 2020. "Corporate Remediation of Human Rights Violations: A Restorative Justice Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 475-493, December.
    19. Sudheer Chava, 2014. "Environmental Externalities and Cost of Capital," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(9), pages 2223-2247, September.
    20. Charles J. Hadlock & Joshua R. Pierce, 2010. "New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the KZ Index," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(5), pages 1909-1940.
    21. Jin, Chenfei & Monfort, Abel & Chen, Feng & Xia, Neng & Wu, Bao, 2024. "Institutional investor ESG activism and corporate green innovation against climate change: Exploring differences between digital and non-digital firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    22. Zhang, Yijun & Meng, Zhenzhen & Song, Yi, 2023. "Digital transformation and metal enterprise value: Evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiong Zheng & Lingling Li & Zhanjie Wang & Mengni Cao, 2025. "Solid Waste Governance Action and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China’s “Zero-Waste City” Pilot Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cosma, Simona & Rimo, Giuseppe & Schwizer, Paola, 2025. "Environmental controversies, environmental fines and firms’ default risk," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(PA).
    2. Zhang, Dongyang & Bai, Dingchuan & Wang, Yizhi, 2024. "Green vs. brown: Climate risk showdown – who’s thriving, who’s diving?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    3. Paola Brighi & Antonio Carlo Francesco Della Bina & Valeria Venturelli, 2022. "Do ESG Investments Mitigate ESG Controversies? Evidence From International Data," Centro Studi di Banca e Finanza (CEFIN) (Center for Studies in Banking and Finance) 0084, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    4. Erhemjamts, Otgontsetseg & Huang, Kershen & Tehranian, Hassan, 2024. "Climate risk, ESG performance, and ESG sentiment in US commercial banks," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    5. Li, Shihan & Liu, Qingfu & Lu, Lei & Zheng, Kaixin, 2022. "Green policy and corporate social responsibility: Empirical analysis of the Green Credit Guidelines in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Shakil, Mohammad Hassan & Pollestad, Arne Johan & Kyaw, Khine, 2025. "Environmental, social and governance controversies and systematic risk: A machine learning approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Se‐Hee Jeong & Jeong‐Ji Han & Soyoung Jun & Shawn Kim & Jong Woo Kim, 2025. "Investor Responses to ESG News Sentiment: Exploring Differential Effects and Industry Moderation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3944-3964, May.
    8. Nohe, Max, 2024. "Retail disruptions and their impact on suppliers in the grocery sector," Other publications TiSEM 2216cd14-a5de-4a9d-bd0d-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Al-Shaer, Habiba & Uyar, Ali & Kuzey, Cemil & Karaman, Abdullah S., 2023. "Do shareholders punish or reward excessive CSR engagement? Moderating effect of cash flow and firm growth," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    10. Chia-Ying Chan & Iftekhar Hasan & Chih-Yung Lin, 2021. "Agency cost of CEO perquisites in bank loan contracts," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1221-1258, May.
    11. Omesh Kini & Mo Shen & Jaideep Shenoy & Venkat Subramaniam, 2022. "Labor Unions and Product Quality Failures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5403-5440, July.
    12. Xie, Xuejing & Gong, Yukai & Cheng, Le, 2025. "Managerial myopia and carbon emission: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Keum, Daniel & Meier, Stephan, 2020. "License to Fire? Unemployment Insurance and the Moral Cost of Layoffs," IZA Discussion Papers 13497, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Liu, Yang & Dong, Kangyin & Nepal, Rabindra & Afi, Hatem, 2025. "How do climate risks affect corporate ESG performance? Micro evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    15. Krüger, Philipp, 2015. "Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 304-329.
    16. Müller, Isabella & Nguyen, Huyen & Nguyen, Trang, 2024. "Carbon transition risk and corporate loan securitization," IWH Discussion Papers 22/2022, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH), revised 2024.
    17. Wang, Jiawei (Brooke), 2023. "Natural disasters and firm leasing: A collateral channel," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    18. Atif Ikram & Zhichuan (Frank) Li & Travis MacDonald, 2020. "CEO Pay Sensitivity (Delta and Vega) and Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    19. He, Guanming & Li, Zhichao & Yu, Ling & Zhou, Zhanqiang, 2023. "Contribution to poverty alleviation: A waste or benefit for corporate financing?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    20. Lijuan Xiao & Min Bai & Yafeng Qin & Lingyun Xiong & Lijuan Yang, 2021. "Financial Slack and Inefficient Investment Decisions in China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 920-941, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2750-:d:1616177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.