IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8324-d1751111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Sectoral Vulnerability to Natural Disasters in the US Stock Market: Sectoral Insights from DCC-GARCH Models with Generalized Hyperbolic Innovations

Author

Listed:
  • Adriana AnaMaria Davidescu

    (Department of Statistics and Econometrics, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010552 Bucharest, Romania
    Department of Education, Training and Labour Market, National Scientific Research Institute for Labour and Social Protection, 010643 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Eduard Mihai Manta

    (Department of Statistics and Econometrics, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010552 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Margareta-Stela Florescu

    (Department of Administration and Public Management, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Robert-Stefan Constantin

    (Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Calea Dorobanți 15–17, 010552 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cristina Manole

    (Department of Administration and Public Management, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The escalating frequency and severity of natural disasters present significant challenges to the stability and sustainability of global financial systems, with the US stock market being especially vulnerable. This study examines sector-level exposure and contagion dynamics during climate-related disaster events, providing insights essential for sustainable investing and resilient financial planning. Using an advanced econometric framework—dynamic conditional correlation GARCH (DCC-GARCH) augmented with Generalized Hyperbolic Processes (GHPs) and an asymmetric specification (ADCC-GARCH)—we model daily stock returns for 20 publicly traded US companies across five sectors (insurance, energy, automotive, retail, and industrial) between 2017 and 2022. The results reveal considerable sectoral heterogeneity: insurance and energy sectors exhibit the highest vulnerability, with heavy-tailed return distributions and persistent volatility, whereas retail and selected industrial firms demonstrate resilience, including counter-cyclical behavior during crises. GHP-based models improve tail risk estimation by capturing return asymmetries, skewness, and leptokurtosis beyond Gaussian specifications. Moreover, the ADCC-GHP-GARCH framework shows that negative shocks induce more persistent correlation shifts than positive ones, highlighting asymmetric contagion effects during stress periods. The results present the insurance and energy sectors as the most exposed to extreme events, backed by the heavy-tailed return distributions and persistent volatility. In contrast, the retail and select industrial firms exhibit resilience and show stable, and in some cases, counter-cyclical, behavior in crises. The results from using a GHP indicate a slight improvement in model specification fit, capturing return asymmetries, skewness, and leptokurtosis indications, in comparison to standard Gaussian models. It was also shown with an ADCC-GHP-GARCH model that negative shocks result in a greater and more durable change in correlations than positive shocks, reinforcing the consideration of asymmetry contagion in times of stress. By integrating sector-specific financial responses into a climate-disaster framework, this research supports the design of targeted climate risk mitigation strategies, sustainable investment portfolios, and regulatory stress-testing approaches that account for volatility clustering and tail dependencies. The findings contribute to the literature on financial resilience by providing a robust statistical basis for assessing how extreme climate events impact asset values, thereby informing both policy and practice in advancing sustainable economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriana AnaMaria Davidescu & Eduard Mihai Manta & Margareta-Stela Florescu & Robert-Stefan Constantin & Cristina Manole, 2025. "Evaluating Sectoral Vulnerability to Natural Disasters in the US Stock Market: Sectoral Insights from DCC-GARCH Models with Generalized Hyperbolic Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-35, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8324-:d:1751111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8324/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8324/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noy, Ilan, 2009. "The macroeconomic consequences of disasters," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 221-231, March.
    2. Balcılar, Mehmet & Demirer, Rıza & Hammoudeh, Shawkat & Nguyen, Duc Khuong, 2016. "Risk spillovers across the energy and carbon markets and hedging strategies for carbon risk," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 159-172.
    3. Balcilar, Mehmet & Gupta, Rangan & Miller, Stephen M., 2015. "Regime switching model of US crude oil and stock market prices: 1859 to 2013," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 317-327.
    4. Bourdeau-Brien, Michael & Kryzanowski, Lawrence, 2017. "The impact of natural disasters on the stock returns and volatilities of local firms," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 259-270.
    5. Necula, Ciprian, 2009. "Modeling Heavy-Tailed Stock Index Returns Using the Generalized Hyperbolic Distribution," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 6(2), pages 118-131, June.
    6. W J Wouter Botzen & Olivier Deschenes & Mark Sanders, 2019. "The Economic Impacts of Natural Disasters: A Review of Models and Empirical Studies," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 13(2), pages 167-188.
    7. Stefano Battiston & Antoine Mandel & Irene Monasterolo & Franziska Schütze & Gabriele Visentin, 2017. "A climate stress-test of the financial system," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(4), pages 283-288, April.
    8. Yang, Xin & Ao, Xuan & Cao, Jie & Huang, Chuangxia, 2024. "Does liquidity connectedness affect stock price crash risk? Evidence from China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Zhao, Rui & Zhang, Dayong & Guo, Mengmeng, 2024. "Do natural disasters affect stock price crash risk? Evidence from emerging markets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Broadstock, David C. & Cheng, Louis T.W., 2019. "Time-varying relation between black and green bond price benchmarks: Macroeconomic determinants for the first decade," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 17-22.
    11. Zhang, Yuyao & Li, Yinuo & Chen, Xingyu, 2024. "Does green bond issuance affect stock price crash risk? Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    12. Paul H. Kupiec, 1995. "Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 95-24, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    13. Xiao Jiang & Saralees Nadarajah & Thomas Hitchen, 2024. "A Review of Generalized Hyperbolic Distributions," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(1), pages 595-624, July.
    14. Cepni, Oguzhan & Demirer, Riza & Rognone, Lavinia, 2022. "Hedging climate risks with green assets," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    15. Emily Tyler & Richard Chivaka, 2011. "The use of real options valuation methodology in enhancing the understanding of the impact of climate change on companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 55-70, January.
    16. Tina Hviid Rydberg, 1999. "Generalized Hyperbolic Diffusion Processes with Applications in Finance," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(2), pages 183-201, April.
    17. Engle, Robert, 2002. "Dynamic Conditional Correlation: A Simple Class of Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(3), pages 339-350, July.
    18. Cameron Hepburn & Brian O’Callaghan & Nicholas Stern & Joseph Stiglitz & Dimitri Zenghelis, 2020. "Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change?," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 36(Supplemen), pages 359-381.
    19. Michele Leonardo Bianchi & Giovanni De Luca & Giorgia Rivieccio, 2020. "CoVaR with volatility clustering, heavy tails and non-linear dependence," Papers 2009.10764, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agarwala, Matthew & Burke, Matt & Klusak, Patrycja & Mohaddes, Kamiar & Volz, Ulrich & Zenghelis, Dimitri, 2021. "Climate Change And Fiscal Sustainability: Risks And Opportunities," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 258, pages 28-46, November.
    2. Juan Pablo Bermúdez-Cespedes & Luis Fernando Melo-Velandia & Daniel Parra-Amado, 2025. "Sovereign Risk and Stock Market Response to Natural Disasters in Emerging Economies," Borradores de Economia 1303, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    3. Arin, K. Peren & Marti Arnau, Josep & Boduroglu, Elif & Celik, Esref Ugur, 2024. "Shaken, stirred and indebted: Firm-level effects of earthquakes," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Yousaf, Imran & Suleman, Muhammad Tahir & Demirer, Riza, 2022. "Green investments: A luxury good or a financial necessity?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    5. Hou, Yang (Greg) & Xu, Danyang & Oxley, Les & Goodell, John W., 2024. "Price discovery of climate risk and green bonds: A dynamic information leadership share approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PB).
    6. Matthew Agarwala & Matt Burke & Patrycja Klusak & Kamiar Mohaddes & Ulrich Volz & Dimitri Zenghelis, 2021. "Climate Change and Fiscal Responsibility: Risks and Opportunities," Working Papers 008, The Productivity Institute.
    7. Chavleishvili, Sulkhan & Moench, Emanuel, 2025. "Natural disasters as macroeconomic tail risks," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    8. Cepni, Oguzhan & Demirer, Riza & Pham, Linh & Rognone, Lavinia, 2023. "Climate uncertainty and information transmissions across the conventional and ESG assets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    9. Akhtaruzzaman, Md & Banerjee, Ameet Kumar & Ghardallou, Wafa & Umar, Zaghum, 2022. "Is greenness an optimal hedge for sectoral stock indices?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    10. Matteo Coronese & Davide Luzzati, 2022. "Economic impacts of natural hazards and complexity science: a critical review," LEM Papers Series 2022/13, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    11. E. Ramos-P'erez & P. J. Alonso-Gonz'alez & J. J. N'u~nez-Vel'azquez, 2020. "Forecasting volatility with a stacked model based on a hybridized Artificial Neural Network," Papers 2006.16383, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    12. Rannou, Yves & Boutabba, Mohamed Amine & Barneto, Pascal, 2021. "Are Green Bond and Carbon Markets in Europe complements or substitutes? Insights from the activity of power firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    13. Agostino, Mariarosaria, 2024. "Extreme weather events and firms’ energy practices. The role of country governance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    14. Alexander, Carol & Sheedy, Elizabeth, 2008. "Developing a stress testing framework based on market risk models," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 2220-2236, October.
    15. Beirne, John & Dafermos, Yannis & Kriwoluzky, Alexander & Renzhi, Nuobu & Volz, Ulrich & Wittich, Jana, 2022. "Natural Disasters and Inflation in the Euro Area," VfS Annual Conference 2022 (Basel): Big Data in Economics 264132, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    16. Emanuel Moench & Robin Schaal, 2025. "The impact of extreme weather events on the term structure of sovereign debt," Working Papers 11088, South African Reserve Bank.
    17. John Beirne & Yannis Dafermos & Alexander Kriwoluzky & Nuobu Renzhi & Ulrich Volz & Jana Wittich, 2021. "The Effects of Natural Disasters on Price Stability in the Euro Area," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1981, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    18. Chi-Young Choi & Yu Zhang & Michelle Hummel & Qin Qian, 2025. "Reassessing the economic impacts of Hurricane Harvey on Texas: a closer look with granular analyses," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(5), pages 5921-5945, March.
    19. Susana Ferreira, 2024. "Extreme Weather Events and Climate Change: Economic Impacts and Adaptation Policies," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 16(1), pages 207-231, October.
    20. Abedifar, Pejman & Kashizadeh, Seyed Javad & Ongena, Steven, 2024. "Flood, farms and credit: The role of branch banking in the era of climate change," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8324-:d:1751111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.