IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7377-d1724985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Product Innovation Coordination in Aluminum Building Material Supply Chains with Innovation Capability Heterogeneity: A Biform Game-Theoretic Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mingyue Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Rui Kong

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory on Resources and Environment Capacity under Ministry of Land and Resources of People’s Republic of China, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jianfu Luo

    (School of Engineering, Hulunbuir University, Hailar 021008, China)

Abstract

Green product innovation in aluminum building material supply chains is critical for sustainability, particularly amid growing economic and environmental pressures. However, effective coordination is challenged by the presence of multiple agents with divergent interests and heterogeneous innovation capacities. This study proposes coordination mechanisms based on a biform game that integrates both non-cooperative and cooperative elements. Key findings include the following: (1) Greater innovation capability heterogeneity promotes green innovation investment by the stronger manufacturer and enhances overall welfare, but reduce the supplier’s profit. (2) Biform game-based decision making supports the triple bottom line more effectively than decentralized models and offers greater flexibility than centralized ones. (3) A multi-perspective compensation contract, incorporating three decision-making modes, is developed within the biform game. Exogenous decision making helps resolve the endogenous game dilemma, improving coordination outcomes. (4) The coordination framework allows firms to dynamically adjust compensation parameters in response to environmental changes, thereby enhancing supply chain resilience. Our main contribution lies in applying a novel biform game approach to address coordination challenges in green product innovation under innovation capability heterogeneity. In addition, a multi-perspective contract coordination paradigm is proposed to support triple bottom line sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingyue Wang & Rui Kong & Jianfu Luo, 2025. "Green Product Innovation Coordination in Aluminum Building Material Supply Chains with Innovation Capability Heterogeneity: A Biform Game-Theoretic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-52, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7377-:d:1724985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7377/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7377/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing, Fei & Lin, Jun & Zhang, Qiao & Qian, Yanjun, 2022. "New technology introduction and product rollover strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 324-336.
    2. Nicholas Bloom & Charles I. Jones & John Van Reenen & Michael Webb, 2020. "Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(4), pages 1104-1144, April.
    3. Nishino, Nariaki & Okazaki, Miki & Akai, Kenju, 2018. "Effects of ability difference and strategy imitation on cooperation network formation: A study with game theoretic modeling and multi-agent simulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 145-156.
    4. Ahmad Fadavi & Fariborz Jolai & Ata Allah Taleizadeh, 2022. "Green product design in a supply chain with considering marketing under competition and coordination," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11721-11759, October.
    5. Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Li, Deng-Feng, 2023. "A new biform game-based investment incentive mechanism for eco-efficient innovation in supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    6. Kirchoff, Jon F. & Falasca, Mauro, 2022. "Environmental differentiation from a supply chain practice view perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    7. Wen Cheng & Qian Li & Qunqi Wu & Yahong Jiang & Fei Ye, 2024. "Cooperative Promotion and Wholesale Price Discount Incentives in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Dynamic Returns," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    8. Wenming Sun & Leilei Jiang & Ke Dong, 2023. "Research on Supply Chain Coordination Decision Model Based on Green Technology," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    9. Feess, Eberhard & Thun, Jörn-Henrik, 2014. "Surplus division and investment incentives in supply chains: A biform-game analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 763-773.
    10. Lin, Yini & Wu, Lei-Yu, 2014. "Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 407-413.
    11. Khalid H. Alshammari & Abdulhamid F. Alshammari, 2023. "Green Innovation and Its Effects on Innovation Climate and Environmental Sustainability: The Moderating Influence of Green Abilities and Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Chun-Hung Cheng & Bau-Jen Tang & Yea-Rong Cheng, 2024. "Strategies and Tools for Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) to Move toward Green Operations: The Case of the Taiwan Metal Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, May.
    13. Afonso Almeida Costa & Peter Zemsky, 2021. "The choice of value‐based strategies under rivalry: Whether to enhance value creation or bargaining capabilities," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(11), pages 2020-2046, November.
    14. Summerfield, Nichalin S. & Dror, Moshe, 2013. "Biform game: Reflection as a stochastic programming problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 124-129.
    15. Kai Cao & Yanlan Mei, 2022. "Green Supply Chain Decision and Management under Manufacturer’s Fairness Concern and Risk Aversion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Tian, Chen & Xiao, Tiaojun & Shang, Jennifer, 2022. "Channel differentiation strategy in a dual-channel supply chain considering free riding behavior," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 473-485.
    17. Constance E. Helfat & Aseem Kaul & David J. Ketchen & Jay B. Barney & Olivier Chatain & Harbir Singh, 2023. "Renewing the resource‐based view: New contexts, new concepts, and new methods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 1357-1390, June.
    18. Anne Marie Knott, 2003. "Persistent heterogeneity and sustainable innovation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(8), pages 687-705, August.
    19. Harborne W. Stuart, Jr., 2005. "Biform Analysis of Inventory Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 347-359, July.
    20. Xiao, Yujie & Niu, Wenju & Zhang, Lianmin & Xue, Weili, 2023. "Store brand introduction in a dual-channel supply chain: The roles of quality differentiation and power structure," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    21. Chen, Jingxian & Liang, Liang & Yao, Dong-Qing & Sun, Shengnan, 2017. "Price and quality decisions in dual-channel supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 935-948.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jia, Fu & Zhang, Shiyuan & Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2023. "A novel coordination mechanism to coordinate the multi-agent reverse supply chain with fairness concerns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    2. Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Li, Deng-Feng, 2023. "A new biform game-based investment incentive mechanism for eco-efficient innovation in supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    3. Kai-Rong Liang & Kevin W. Li & Fabio Sgarbossa & Jun Huang, 2025. "A Biform Game Approach to Store Brand Introduction and Production Mode Selection in a Platform Supply Chain," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 557-587, June.
    4. Fuentes González, Fabián & van der Weijde, Adriaan Hendrik & Sauma, Enzo, 2020. "The promotion of community energy projects in Chile and Scotland: An economic approach using biform games," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    5. Chenwei Liu & Shuwen Xiang & Yanlong Yang, 2021. "A Biform Game Model with the Shapley Allocation Functions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Zhang, Shiyuan & Jia, Fu & Lin, Xiao, 2024. "A new biform game-based coordination mechanism for a carbon complementary supply chain under hybrid carbon regulations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. van Beek, Andries & Malmberg, Benjamin & Borm, Peter & Quant, Marieke & Schouten, Jop, 2021. "Cooperation and Competition in Linear Production and Sequencing Processes," Discussion Paper 2021-011, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    8. Pi, Zhenyang & Fang, Weiguo & Perera, Sandun C. & Zhang, Baofeng, 2022. "Enhancing the online buyer perception of consumer experience products in a dual-channel supply chain: A new role of free-riding," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    9. Yang, Jiaquan & Li, Kevin W. & Huang, Jun, 2023. "Manufacturer encroachment with a new product under network externalities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    10. Hezarkhani, Behzad & Demirel, Guven & Bouchery, Yann & Dora, Manoj, 2023. "Can “ugly veg” supply chains reduce food loss?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 117-132.
    11. Fuentes González, Fabián & Sauma, Enzo & van der Weijde, Adriaan Hendrik, 2022. "Community energy projects in the context of generation and transmission expansion planning," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. Jianhua Wang & Xinyan Cai, 2024. "Research on Decision-Making and Coordination of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Under Green and Low-Carbon Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Yu Xia & Rongrong Shang & Mingxia Wei & Zhenke Wei, 2024. "Optimal pricing and financing decision of dual-channel green supply chain considering product differentiation and blockchain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(2), pages 1317-1358, July.
    14. Chenwei Liu & Shuwen Xiang & Yanlong Yang & Shanshan Xu, 2025. "Biform game analysis with the Owen allocation function for a supply chain game under precedence constraints," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1-33, June.
    15. Zhao, Qingli & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Sun, Minghe, 2024. "Manufacturer blockchain technology adoption strategies for different sales channels in an e-commerce platform supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    16. T. M. Rofin & Sreejith Alathur, 2024. "Optimal online channel configuration for a Manufacturer under price and lead time-sensitive demand," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(2), pages 121-139, April.
    17. Wang, Zhanpeng & Ye, Chao & Liu, Xinxin & Ma, Ruize & Sun, Zilai & Ruan, Junhu, 2023. "Optimal retail sales strategies for old and new products in monopoly and horizontal competition scenarios," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    18. van Beek, Andries & Malmberg, Benjamin & Borm, Peter & Quant, Marieke & Schouten, Jop, 2023. "Competition and cooperation in linear production and sequencing processes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 117-132.
    19. Rodolphe Durand & Robert M. Grant & Tammy L. Madsen & Joshua Gans & Michael D. Ryall, 2017. "Value capture theory: A strategic management review," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 17-41, January.
    20. Tao, Ran & Lan, Yanfei & Zhao, Ruiqing & Gao, Rong, 2025. "Product line extensions and distribution channels in pharmaceutical supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(2), pages 490-503.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7377-:d:1724985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.