IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6191-d1695667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Farmers’ Digital Participation on Cultivated Land Ecological Protection

Author

Listed:
  • Qinghua Xin

    (School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China)

  • Baijun Wu

    (School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China)

  • Yaru Shi

    (School of Economics, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276827, China)

Abstract

The increasingly severe ecological and environmental problems in rural areas pose a serious threat to agricultural sustainability and human well-being. Protecting the ecological environment of cultivated land is fundamental to ensuring food security and achieving sustainable development goals. The effective integration of digital technology into farmers’ production and daily life is a key driver for transforming farming practices and advancing the ecological protection of cultivated land. This study draws on data from the 2020 China Rural Revitalization Survey (CRRS) to systematically examine the impact of farmers’ digital participation on the ecological protection of cultivated land. The main findings are as follows: (1) Digital participation significantly promotes ecological conservation of cultivated land, with each unit increase associated with a 7.8% reduction in fertilizer use intensity; (2) the results are robust across various empirical strategies, including instrumental variable estimation, the ERM approach, residual analysis, and alternative indicator specifications; (3) mechanism analysis indicates that digital participation reduces fertilizer use through three main channels: expansion of social networks (accounting for 7.10%), enhancement of subjective cognition (29.66%), and adoption of agricultural technologies (10.18%); and (4) heterogeneity analysis shows that the protective effects on cultivated land are more pronounced among households with off-farm employment experience, in villages where leaders have higher educational attainment, and in regions with more advanced digital environments. Based on these findings, the following policy recommendations are proposed: enhancing digital infrastructure in rural areas, strengthening the training of agricultural practitioners, and developing localized digital environments tailored to local conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Qinghua Xin & Baijun Wu & Yaru Shi, 2025. "The Impact of Farmers’ Digital Participation on Cultivated Land Ecological Protection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6191-:d:1695667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6191/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6191/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonah B. Gelbach, 2016. "When Do Covariates Matter? And Which Ones, and How Much?," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 34(2), pages 509-543.
    2. Ritu Agarwal & Anil K. Gupta & Robert Kraut, 2008. "Editorial Overview ---The Interplay Between Digital and Social Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 243-252, September.
    3. Xinhui Peng & Xiaohuan Yan & Hongmei Wang, 2024. "Study on the Effect of Digital Technology Adoption and Farmers’ Cognition on Fertilizer Reduction and Efficiency Improvement Behavior," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Mohammad Mahbubur Rahman & Jeffry D. Connor, 2022. "Impact of Agricultural Extension Services on Fertilizer Use and Farmers’ Welfare: Evidence from Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Haixin Tao & Liming Fang & Jiaying Lu & Xuezhu Shi, 2025. "The Impact of Digital Literacy on Farmers’ Pesticide Packaging Waste Recycling Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Junxin Shen & Huizi Zhao & Fanghao Xiao, 2025. "Empowerment and Pathways of Digital Economy in Rural Revitalization: A Case Study of Low Urbanization Areas in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Baozhi Li & Ni Zhuo & Chen Ji & Qibiao Zhu, 2022. "Influence of Smartphone-Based Digital Extension Service on Farmers’ Sustainable Agricultural Technology Adoption in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Maomao Zhang & Enqing Chen & Cheng Zhang & Chen Liu & Jianxing Li, 2024. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of Land Use Change and Ecosystem Service Value Based on the Markov–FLUS Model in Ezhou City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-23, July.
    9. Thia Hennessy & Doris Läpple & Brian Moran, 2016. "The Digital Divide in Farming: A Problem of Access or Engagement?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 38(3), pages 474-491.
    10. Shanshan Li & Shengyang Sun & Chao Zhang, 2024. "Internet-Based Information Acquisition, Technical Knowledge and Farmers’ Pesticide Use: Evidence from Rice Production in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Dan Qiao & Ningjie Li & Li Cao & Desheng Zhang & Yanan Zheng & Tao Xu, 2022. "How Agricultural Extension Services Improve Farmers’ Organic Fertilizer Use in China? The Perspective of Neighborhood Effect and Ecological Cognition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Yan Wang & Yongjie Wu, 2025. "Digital Economy, Rural E-Commerce Development, and Farmers’ Employment Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Yu Wang & Ganqiong Li & Shengwei Wang & Yongen Zhang & Denghua Li & Han Zhou & Wen Yu & Shiwei Xu, 2022. "A Comprehensive Evaluation of Benefit of High-Standard Farmland Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-13, August.
    14. Mohammad Sharif Sharifzadeh & Gholamhossein Abdollahzadeh & Christos A. Damalas & Rohollah Rezaei, 2018. "Farmers’ Criteria for Pesticide Selection and Use in the Pest Control Process," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, February.
    15. Yue Wang & Feilong Weng & Xuexi Huo, 2023. "Can Digital Finance Promote Professional Farmers’ Income Growth in China?—An Examination Based on the Perspective of Income Structure," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, May.
    16. Fengwan Zhang & Xueling Bao & Xin Deng & Dingde Xu, 2022. "Rural Land Transfer in the Information Age: Can Internet Use Affect Farmers’ Land Transfer-In?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    17. Xiaoxuan Chen & Tongshan Liu, 2023. "Can Agricultural Socialized Services Promote the Reduction in Chemical Fertilizer? Analysis Based on the Moderating Effect of Farm Size," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Jęczmyk & Roma Ryś-Jurek, 2025. "Taxation of Farms in the European Union and Its Sensitivity to Economic Indicators: Evidence from Poland (2004–2022)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xinyue Wang & Kegao Yan & Yang Shi & Han Hu & Shanjun Mao, 2025. "The Nonlinear Impact of Economic Growth Pressure on Urban Land Green Utilization Efficiency—Empirical Research from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-29, March.
    2. Daniel A. Dias & Carlos Robalo Marques & Christine Richmond, 2020. "A Tale of Two Sectors: Why is Misallocation Higher in Services than in Manufacturing?," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 66(2), pages 361-393, June.
    3. Anna Aizer & Paul J. Devereux & Kjell G. Salvanes, 2019. "Grandparents, Mothers, or Fathers? Why Children of Teen Mothers do Worse in Life," Working Papers 201908, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    4. Ellis, Jimmy R. & Gershenson, Seth, 2016. "LATE for the Meeting: Gender, Peer Advising, and College Success," IZA Discussion Papers 9956, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. repec:osf:metaar:s42ba_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Virginia Minni, 2023. "Making the invisible hand visible: Managers and the allocation of workers to jobs," STICERD - Economic Organisation and Public Policy Discussion Papers Series 72, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    7. Menta, Giorgia & Lepinteur, Anthony & Clark, Andrew E. & Ghislandi, Simone & D'Ambrosio, Conchita, 2023. "Maternal genetic risk for depression and child human capital," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    8. Delaney, Judith M. & Devereux, Paul J., 2019. "Understanding gender differences in STEM: Evidence from college applications✰," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 219-238.
    9. Timothy F. Harris & Aaron Yelowitz, 2018. "Life Insurance Holdings And Well‐Being Of Surviving Spouses," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 36(3), pages 526-538, July.
    10. Mingyue Li & Pujie Zhao & Yu Sun, 2025. "Impacts of Green Perception Benefits and Environmental Regulation Intensity on Farmers’ Agricultural Green Production Willingness: A New Perspective of Technology Acquisition," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-33, June.
    11. Monica Bozzano & Simona Scabrosetti, 2024. "What Drives Gender Gaps in Preferences for Redistribution? New Evidence from the European Social Survey," Working papers 118, Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica.
    12. Grosch, Kerstin & Haeckl, Simone & Kocher , Martin G., 2022. "Closing the gender STEM gap. A large-scale randomized-controlled trial in elementary schools," UiS Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2022/4, University of Stavanger.
    13. Tzu-Cheng Chang & Jia-Hong Tang & Ta-Chien Chan, 2025. "Spatiotemporal impact of urban development on nighttime light intensity and its hotspot distribution," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Collischon Matthias, 2019. "Is There a Glass Ceiling over Germany?," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 20(4), pages 329-359, December.
    15. Rigissa Megalokonomou & Yi Zhang, 2022. "How Good Am I? Effects and Mechanisms behind Salient Ranks," CESifo Working Paper Series 9991, CESifo.
    16. Ellis, Jimmy R. & Gershenson, Seth, 2020. "Gender, peer advising, and college success," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    17. Xuezhen Xu & Fang Wang & Tao Xu & Sufyan Ullah Khan, 2023. "How Does Capital Endowment Impact Farmers’ Green Production Behavior? Perspectives on Ecological Cognition and Environmental Regulation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, August.
    18. Yang Guo & Meiling Cui & Zhigang Xu, 2023. "Effect of Spatial Characteristics of Farmland Plots on Transfer Patterns in China: A Supply and Demand Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Lobeck, Max & Morten.Stostad@nhh.no, Morten Nyborg, 2023. "The Consequences of Inequality: Beliefs and Redistributive Preferences," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 17/2023, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.
    20. Boulier, Bryan & Emran, M. Shahe & Hoque, Nazmul, 2021. "Access to Credit, Education, and Women’s Say in the Household: Evidence from Bangladesh," MPRA Paper 109009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Rietveld, Cornelius A. & Webbink, Dinand, 2016. "On the genetic bias of the quarter of birth instrument," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 137-146.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6191-:d:1695667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.