IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5815-d1686242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of the Impact of AI on Human Resource Management Practices Among Human Resource Managers Working in the Chemical Industry in Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Saeed Turki Alshahrani

    (College of Business, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia)

  • Jamel Choukir

    (College of Business, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia)

  • Saja Albelali

    (College of Business, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdulaziz Abdulmohsen AlShalhoob

    (College of Business, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate perceptions among HR managers in Saudi Arabia and compare these perceptions across demographic characteristics. Furthermore, the study examines the influence of AI knowledge and frequency of use on perceptions. An online survey was administered to a purposive sample of 420 HR managers working in the chemical industry in Saudi Arabia, and 234 complete responses were received. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, and structural equation modeling. Findings show that AI was perceived positively, particularly in salary management, recruitment, performance evaluation, and training, but there were concerns about the loss of jobs and privacy. HR managers with higher education had a higher positive perception towards recruitment, selection, training, and performance appraisals. Knowledge and frequency of AI use had a positive influence on performance appraisal, recruitment and selection, and training, but had no influence on compensation and rewards. This study contributes to the literature by investigating perceptions of HR managers in the Saudi Arabia context. This is especially relevant in the context of technological advancement and Vision 2030 ambitions. Specifically, AI has the potential to create a skilled workforce eager for green innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Saeed Turki Alshahrani & Jamel Choukir & Saja Albelali & Abdulaziz Abdulmohsen AlShalhoob, 2025. "Perceptions of the Impact of AI on Human Resource Management Practices Among Human Resource Managers Working in the Chemical Industry in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5815-:d:1686242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5815/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5815/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arunava Narayan Mukherjee, 2022. "Application of artificial intelligence: benefits and limitations for human potential and labor-intensive economy – an empirical investigation into pandemic ridden Indian industry," Management Matters, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(2), pages 149-166, June.
    2. Patnaik, Priyadarsini & Bakkar, Mahmoud, 2024. "Exploring determinants influencing artificial intelligence adoption, reference to diffusion of innovation theory," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    3. David Autor, 2014. "Polanyi's Paradox and the Shape of Employment Growth," NBER Working Papers 20485, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksandra Parteka & Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz, 2020. "Wage response to global production links: evidence for workers from 28 European countries (2005–2014)," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 156(4), pages 769-801, November.
    2. David Deming & Lisa B. Kahn, 2018. "Skill Requirements across Firms and Labor Markets: Evidence from Job Postings for Professionals," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(S1), pages 337-369.
    3. David J. Deming, 2017. "The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 132(4), pages 1593-1640.
    4. Ross, Matthew B., 2017. "Routine-biased technical change: Panel evidence of task orientation and wage effects," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 198-214.
    5. Michael Coelli & Jeff Borland, 2016. "Job Polarisation and Earnings Inequality in Australia," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 92(296), pages 1-27, March.
    6. Echeverri-Carroll, Elsie L. & Oden, Michael D. & Gibson, David V. & Johnston, Evan A., 2018. "Unintended consequences on gender diversity of high-tech growth and labor market polarization," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 209-217.
    7. Olarreaga, Marcelo & Cruz, Marcio & Milet, Emmanuel, 2017. "Online Exports and the Wage Gap," CEPR Discussion Papers 12092, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Bokrantz, Jon & Skoogh, Anders & Berlin, Cecilia & Wuest, Thorsten & Stahre, Johan, 2020. "Smart Maintenance: a research agenda for industrial maintenance management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    9. Sébastien Bock, 2018. "Job Polarization and Unskilled Employment Losses in France," PSE Working Papers halshs-01513037, HAL.
    10. Brad Hershbein & Lisa B. Kahn, 2018. "Do Recessions Accelerate Routine-Biased Technological Change? Evidence from Vacancy Postings," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(7), pages 1737-1772, July.
    11. Casey, Gregory, 2024. "Unemployment and the direction of technical change," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    12. Masahisa Fujita, 2018. "AI and the future of the brain power society: When the descendants of Athena and Prometheus work together," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 508-523, August.
    13. Daniel Susskind, 2017. "A Model of Technological Unemployment," Economics Series Working Papers 819, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    14. Gregory Casey, 2018. "Technology-Driven Unemployment," 2018 Meeting Papers 302, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    15. Andreas Fügener & Jörn Grahl & Alok Gupta & Wolfgang Ketter, 2022. "Cognitive Challenges in Human–Artificial Intelligence Collaboration: Investigating the Path Toward Productive Delegation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 678-696, June.
    16. Aferdita Dervishi, 2021. "The Importance of Leadership on Business Ethics at Organizations," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 7, ejes_v7_i.
    17. António Moniz & Marta Candeias & Nuno Boavida, 2022. "Changes in productivity and labour relations," Post-Print hal-04670873, HAL.
    18. Wojciech Hardy & Roma Keister & Piotr Lewandowski, 2018. "Educational upgrading, structural change and the task composition of jobs in Europe," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 26(2), pages 201-231, April.
    19. Georg Graetz & Guy Michaels, 2018. "Robots at Work," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 100(5), pages 753-768, December.
    20. Daniel Susskind, 2017. "Re-Thinking the Capabilities of Machines in Economics," Economics Series Working Papers 825, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5815-:d:1686242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.