IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v79y2024ics0160791x24002987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring determinants influencing artificial intelligence adoption, reference to diffusion of innovation theory

Author

Listed:
  • Patnaik, Priyadarsini
  • Bakkar, Mahmoud

Abstract

An organization's ability to accept innovation heavily depends on its leadership caliber. Although leadership is known to affect all three stages of adoption (initiation, adoption, and routinization), literature has yet to examine the specific leadership components that contribute to each of these phases. Drawing from existing literature on transformational leadership and AI adoption, this article examines how transformational leadership can facilitate the successful implementation of AI technologies. This paper explores the intersection of transformational leadership and artificial intelligence (AI) adoption within organizations. This study used data from 250 companies to develop and evaluate a framework combining the Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) theory with transformational leadership (TL). The results were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) techniques. The study examined the determinants influencing the adoption of AI as a new technology. This study found TL is a crucial driver of adoption, whereas elements like vision and intellectual stimulation are essential for the Intention to adopt. Also, this research indicates that adopting a significant innovation like AI is intricately linked to leaders' vision and ability to respect and recognize the feelings and needs of others (both indicators of offering individual assistance). Additionally, practical implications and recommendations for leaders are provided to navigate the complex landscape of AI adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Patnaik, Priyadarsini & Bakkar, Mahmoud, 2024. "Exploring determinants influencing artificial intelligence adoption, reference to diffusion of innovation theory," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:79:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24002987
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24002987
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 342-365, December.
    2. Justin J. P. Jansen & Frans A. J. Van Den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2006. "Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(11), pages 1661-1674, November.
    3. Bavik Ali, 2024. "What we know about transformational leadership in tourism and hospitality: a systematic review and future agenda," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1-2), pages 105-147, January.
    4. Kalle Lyytinen & Youngjin Yoo, 2002. "Research Commentary: The Next Wave of Nomadic Computing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 377-388, December.
    5. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Nripendra P. Rana & Anand Jeyaraj & Marc Clement & Michael D. Williams, 2019. "Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 719-734, June.
    6. Gumusluoglu, Lale & Ilsev, Arzu, 2009. "Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 461-473, April.
    7. Toby E. Stuart, 2000. "Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a high‐technology industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(8), pages 791-811, August.
    8. Francesca Bonetti & Matteo Montecchi & Kirk Plangger & Hope Jensen Schau, 2023. "Practice co-evolution: Collaboratively embedding artificial intelligence in retail practices," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 867-888, July.
    9. Kevin Zhu & Kenneth L. Kraemer & Sean Xu, 2006. "The Process of Innovation Assimilation by Firms in Different Countries: A Technology Diffusion Perspective on E-Business," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(10), pages 1557-1576, October.
    10. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    11. Shi Yin & Yudan Zhao, 2024. "Digital green value co-creation behavior, digital green network embedding and digital green innovation performance: moderating effects of digital green network fragmentation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Aparna Joshi & Mila B. Lazarova & Hui Liao, 2009. "Getting Everyone on Board: The Role of Inspirational Leadership in Geographically Dispersed Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 240-252, February.
    13. Ajay K. Agrawal & Joshua S. Gans & Avi Goldfarb, 2021. "AI Adoption and System-Wide Change," NBER Working Papers 28811, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. García-Morales, Víctor Jesús & Jiménez-Barrionuevo, María Magdalena & Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Leopoldo, 2012. "Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(7), pages 1040-1050.
    15. Kinkel, Steffen & Baumgartner, Marco & Cherubini, Enrica, 2022. "Prerequisites for the adoption of AI technologies in manufacturing – Evidence from a worldwide sample of manufacturing companies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    16. Derrick J Neufeld & Linying Dong & Chris Higgins, 2007. "Charismatic leadership and user acceptance of information technology," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 494-510, August.
    17. Aija Elina Leiponen, 2008. "Competing Through Cooperation: The Organization of Standard Setting in Wireless Telecommunications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(11), pages 1904-1919, November.
    18. Fatma Khamis Al Badi & Khawla Ali Alhosani & Fauzia Jabeen & Agata Stachowicz-Stanusch & Nazia Shehzad & Wolfgang AMANN, 2022. "Challenges of AI Adoption in the UAE Healthcare," Vision, , vol. 26(2), pages 193-207, June.
    19. Kraus, Sascha & Durst, Susanne & Ferreira, João J. & Veiga, Pedro & Kailer, Norbert & Weinmann, Alexandra, 2022. "Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    20. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Baabdullah, Abdullah M., 2021. "Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Al-Atwi, Amer Ali & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Khan, Zaheer, 2021. "Micro-foundations of organizational design and sustainability: The mediating role of learning ambidexterity," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    2. Geraldine A. Wu, 2012. "The Effect of Going Public on Innovative Productivity and Exploratory Search," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 928-950, August.
    3. Yang, Hongyan & Steensma, H. Kevin, 2014. "When do firms rely on their knowledge spillover recipients for guidance in exploring unfamiliar knowledge?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(9), pages 1496-1507.
    4. Vincent K. Chong & Lokman Mia & John Sands & Zhichao Alex Wang, 2023. "The effect of nonfinancial performance measures, absorptive capacity, and organizational learning on innovation performance," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 201-233, June.
    5. Capestro, Mauro & Rizzo, Cristian & Kliestik, Tomas & Peluso, Alessandro M. & Pino, Giovanni, 2024. "Enabling digital technologies adoption in industrial districts: The key role of trust and knowledge sharing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    6. Gun Jea Yu & Joonkyum Lee, 2017. "When should a firm collaborate with research organizations for innovation performance? The moderating role of innovation orientation, size, and age," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(6), pages 1451-1465, December.
    7. Wang, Pengfei & Van De Vrande, Vareska & Jansen, Justin J.P., 2017. "Balancing exploration and exploitation in inventions: Quality of inventions and team composition," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1836-1850.
    8. Dovev Lavie & Jingoo Kang & Lori Rosenkopf, 2011. "Balance Within and Across Domains: The Performance Implications of Exploration and Exploitation in Alliances," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1517-1538, December.
    9. Belderbos, Rene & Faems, Dries & Leten, Bart & Van Looy, Bart, 2009. "Technological activities and their impact on the financial performance of the firm: Exploitation and exploration within and between firms," MERIT Working Papers 2009-067, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    10. Fultz, Andrew E.F. & Hmieleski, Keith M., 2021. "The art of discovering and exploiting unexpected opportunities: The roles of organizational improvisation and serendipity in new venture performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4).
    11. Schulze, Arndt & Dada, Olufunmilola (Lola), 2025. "The effect of corporate venturing on knowledge acquisition and performance in small and medium-sized firms in Germany," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    12. Sarooghi, Hessamoddin & Libaers, Dirk & Burkemper, Andrew, 2015. "Examining the relationship between creativity and innovation: A meta-analysis of organizational, cultural, and environmental factors," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 714-731.
    13. Oduro, Stephen & De Nisco, Alessandro & Mainolfi, Giada, 2023. "Do digital technologies pay off? A meta-analytic review of the digital technologies/firm performance nexus," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    14. Henri A. Schildt & Markku V.J. Maula & Thomas Keil, 2005. "Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(4), pages 493-515, July.
    15. Liu, Zhiqiang & Yan, Miao & Fan, Youqing & Chen, Liling, 2021. "Ascribed or achieved? The role of birth order on innovative behaviour in the workplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 480-492.
    16. Carolina Rojas-Córdova & Amanda J. Williamson & Julio A. Pertuze & Gustavo Calvo, 2023. "Why one strategy does not fit all: a systematic review on exploration–exploitation in different organizational archetypes," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2251-2295, October.
    17. Kathryn Rudie Harrigan & Maria Chiara Guardo & Bo Cowgill, 2017. "Multiplicative-innovation synergies: tests in technological acquisitions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 1212-1233, October.
    18. Mammassis, Constantinos S. & Kostopoulos, Konstantinos C., 2019. "CEO goal orientations, environmental dynamism and organizational ambidexterity: An investigation in SMEs," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 577-588.
    19. Orsatti, Gianluca & Pezzoni, Michele & Quatraro, Francesco, 2017. "Where Do Green Technologies Come From? Inventor Teams’ Recombinant Capabilities and the Creation of New Knowledge," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201711, University of Turin.
    20. Varadarajan, Rajan & Kaul, Rupali, 2018. "Doing well by doing good innovations: alleviation of social problems in emerging markets through corporate social innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 225-233.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:79:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24002987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.