Author
Listed:
- Jing Zhao
(Jingjiang College, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212028, China)
- Yaya Li
(School of Finance & Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)
- Tian Wu
(Department of Student Affairs, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)
- Wen Jiang
(Department of Student Affairs, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)
Abstract
Enhancing residents’ green consumption is essential to fostering high-quality economic advancement. This study constructs an indicator system for residents’ green consumption based on three subsystems: green manufacturing processes, sustainable lifestyles, and environmental ecosystems. A regression model analyzes how public environmental concern affects residents’ green consumption, using panel data from 30 provinces and cities in China over the period 2011–2023. Additionally, analyses of mechanisms and heterogeneity are carried out. The study results are presented below: First, public environmental concern (PEC) can significantly enhance residents’ green consumption (RGC), with an increase of 1% in PEC leading to a 0.261% rise in RGC. Second, green technological innovation (GTI) and market-based incentive environmental regulation (MER) mediate the relationship between PEC and RGC. However, the role of command-and-control environmental regulation (CER) as a mediator is insignificant. Third, there is heterogeneity in RGC based on region, pollution emissions, and innovation foundations. The impact of PEC is notably greater in central-western regions, areas with higher pollution emissions, and regions with better innovation foundations. Therefore, this study proposes policy recommendations from three aspects: improving public environmental concern, strengthening green technological innovation in enterprises, and formulating region-specific industrial upgrading paths to promote residents’ green consumption.
Suggested Citation
Jing Zhao & Yaya Li & Tian Wu & Wen Jiang, 2025.
"Can Public Environmental Concern Drive Changes in Residents’ Green Consumption Behavior?,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-22, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5352-:d:1675648
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5352-:d:1675648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.