IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v98y2025ics0038012125000102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does public satisfaction with government environmental performance promote their participation in environmental protection?

Author

Listed:
  • Jia, Huanyu
  • Lin, Boqiang

Abstract

Effective public participation is a key element of sustainable environmental governance. Despite high levels of concern about pollution among Chinese citizens, their actual participation in governance activities remains suboptimal. Local governments, as socio-economic planning policy makers, may significantly shape individuals’ behavior, yet this influence has not been fully explored. This study investigates how public satisfaction with government environmental performance affects their willingness and actual participation in environmental protection efforts, drawing on the latest data from the Chinese Social Survey. The results show that individuals who express higher satisfaction with government environmental performance are more likely to exhibit greater willingness and active involvement in voluntary environmental initiatives. Mechanism analysis reveals that greater public recognition enhances environmental awareness and government credibility. This research provides critical insights for public sector decision-making, emphasizing that improving government performance in environmental governance can foster sustainable public engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia, Huanyu & Lin, Boqiang, 2025. "Does public satisfaction with government environmental performance promote their participation in environmental protection?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s0038012125000102
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2025.102161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012125000102
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2025.102161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Castillo & Gregory Leo, 2010. "Moral Hazard and Reciprocity," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 77(2), pages 271-281, October.
    2. Wang, Chen & Chu, Zhongzhu & Gu, Wei, 2021. "Assessing the role of public attention in China's wastewater treatment: A spatial perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    3. Li, Xing & Hu, Zhigao & Cao, Jianhua & Xu, Xing, 2022. "The impact of environmental accountability on air pollution: A public attention perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Voltaire, Louinord & Pirrone, Claudio & Bailly, Denis, 2013. "Dealing with preference uncertainty in contingent willingness to pay for a nature protection program: A new approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 76-85.
    5. Tu, Zhengge & Hu, Tianyang & Shen, Renjun, 2019. "Evaluating public participation impact on environmental protection and ecological efficiency in China: Evidence from PITI disclosure," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 111-123.
    6. Zhang, Hua & Xu, Tiantian & Feng, Chao, 2022. "Does public participation promote environmental efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of environmental information disclosure in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. David M. Konisky & Jeffrey Milyo & Lilliard E. Richardson, 2008. "Environmental Policy Attitudes: Issues, Geographical Scale, and Political Trust," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 89(5), pages 1066-1085, December.
    8. Marco Castillo & Gregory Leo, 2010. "Moral Hazard and Reciprocity," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 77(2), pages 271-281, October.
    9. Zhao, Li & Zhang, Ling & Sun, Jianxin & He, Pengfei, 2022. "Can public participation constraints promote green technological innovation of Chinese enterprises? The moderating role of government environmental regulatory enforcement," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    10. Lorenzo Cerda Planas, 2018. "Moving Toward Greener Societies: Moral Motivation and Green Behaviour," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 70(4), pages 835-860, August.
    11. Zhang, Guoxing & Deng, Nana & Mou, Haizhen & Zhang, Zhe George & Chen, Xiaofeng, 2019. "The impact of the policy and behavior of public participation on environmental governance performance: Empirical analysis based on provincial panel data in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1347-1354.
    12. Lei Du & Xing Liu & Helin Sun, 2024. "Corporate sustainable development strategies: Under the collaborative governance of government and the public," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3055-3064, August.
    13. Daniel A. Brent & Corey Lott & Michael Taylor & Joseph Cook & Kimberly Rollins & Shawn Stoddard, 2020. "What Causes Heterogeneous Responses to Social Comparison Messages for Water Conservation?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(3), pages 503-537, November.
    14. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Huanyu, 2023. "Challenges in the energy transition: How does household registration identity affect public participation in environmental affairs in China?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1337-1348.
    15. Hongxin Yu & Yaohui Jiang & Zhaowen Zhang & Wen-Long Shang & Chunjia Han & Yuanjun Zhao, 2022. "The impact of carbon emission trading policy on firms’ green innovation in China," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, December.
    16. Inglehart, Ronald, 1981. "Post-Materialism in an Environment of Insecurity," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(4), pages 880-900, December.
    17. Binder, Martin & Blankenberg, Ann-Kathrin, 2016. "Environmental concerns, volunteering and subjective well-being: Antecedents and outcomes of environmental activism in Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-16.
    18. Kumar, Shantanu & Mehany, Mohammed S.Hashem M., 2022. "A standardized framework for quantitative assessment of cities’ socioeconomic resilience and its improvement measures," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Marco Castillo & Gregory Leo, 2010. "Moral Hazard and Reciprocity," Southern Economic Journal, Southern Economic Association, vol. 77(2), pages 271-281, October.
    20. Louinord Voltaire & Claudio Pirrone & Denis Bailly, 2013. "Dealing with preference uncertainty in contingent willingness to pay for a nature protection program: A new approach," Post-Print hal-00835710, HAL.
    21. Anne M. van Valkengoed & Linda Steg, 2019. "Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behaviour," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(2), pages 158-163, February.
    22. Zhaoliang Wu & Min Jin & Hu Cao, 2024. "Residents' environmental behavior in eco‐community development and its influencing factors: Evidence from Dongying City, Shandong Province in China," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 4338-4353, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Da Gao & Tianyi Zhang & Xiaowei Liu, 2025. "The Urban Renewable Energy Transition: Impact Assessment and Transmission Mechanisms of Climate Policy Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Hao & Tao, Lunchen & Yang, Biyun & Bian, Wenlong, 2023. "The relationship between public participation in environmental governance and corporations’ environmental violations," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    2. Lin Dong & Zuobao Wang & Yuxiang Zhou, 2023. "Public Participation and the Effect of Environmental Governance in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Gupta, Monika, 2016. "Willingness to pay for carbon tax: A study of Indian road passenger transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 46-54.
    4. Voltaire, Louinord & Donfouet, Hermann Pythagore Pierre & Pirrone, Claudio & Larzillière, Agathe, 2017. "Respondent Uncertainty and Ordering Effect on Willingness to Pay for Salt Marsh Conservation in the Brest Roadstead (France)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 47-55.
    5. Carola Braun & Katrin Rehdanz & Ulrich Schmidt, 2016. "Validity of Willingness to Pay Measures under Preference Uncertainty," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Su, Xuewei & Wang, Kaike, 2025. "Carbon dioxide emission reduction effects of non-economic sector tournaments: Evidence from the national civilized city selection," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    7. Jin, Xin, 2025. "Regulation automation and green innovation: Evidence from China's industrial firms," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Zhou, Bo & Ding, Hao, 2023. "How public attention drives corporate environmental protection: Effects and channels," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Su, Hongyan & He, Jie & Wang, Hua, 2025. "Analysing decision behavior styles in contingent valuation: The latent class and the factor analysis," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    10. Jing Zhao & Yaya Li & Tian Wu & Wen Jiang, 2025. "Can Public Environmental Concern Drive Changes in Residents’ Green Consumption Behavior?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Qiang He & Xin Deng & Chuan Li & Zhongcheng Yan & Yanbin Qi, 2021. "Do Internet Skills Increase Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in Environmental Governance? Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Zhang, Yijun & Wang, Haowen & Ruan, Shengzhe & Cheng, Jinhua & Song, Yi, 2024. "Effects of environmental information disclosure on the green development of mining industry: Evidence from Chinese provincial mining sub-sectors," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    13. Teng Wang & Yani Wang & Weiwei Xiong, 2024. "Does Environmental Information Disclosure Reduce PM2.5 Emissions? Evidence from Chinese Prefecture-Level Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Li, Ge & Wen, Huwei, 2023. "The low-carbon effect of pursuing the honor of civilization? A quasi-experiment in Chinese cities," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 343-357.
    15. Wenbing Jiang & Xuejun Wang & Lei Du, 2024. "Environmental Health Check: How third‐party environmental evaluation project affects corporate environmental responsibility," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3065-3074, August.
    16. Marius Yapo & Jie He & Bruno Gagnon & Luc Savard & Roland Leduc, 2015. "La valeur économique pour l’amélioration de la qualité de l’eau: le cas de la rivière Magog et du lac Magog (Québec, Canada)," Cahiers de recherche 15-15, Departement d'économique de l'École de gestion à l'Université de Sherbrooke.
    17. Adam Zydroń & Krzysztof Szoszkiewicz & Cyprian Chwiałkowski, 2021. "Valuing Protected Areas: Socioeconomic Determinants of the Willingness to Pay for the National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, January.
    18. Bart Defloor & Brent Bleys & Elsy Verhofstadt & Luc Van Ootegem, 2022. "How to Reduce Individuals’ Ecological Footprint without Harming Their Well-Being: An Application to Belgium," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-30, April.
    19. Wang, Lisha & Pan, Minjie & Qian, Xinlei & Lv, Kangjuan, 2025. "Do specialized courts matter? Environmental judiciary and corporate emissions in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    20. Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu & Romain Craste & Bengt Kriström & Pere Riera, 2014. "Non-market valuation in France: An overview of the research activity," Working Papers hal-01087365, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s0038012125000102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.