IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3475-d1633972.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influencing Factors of Residents’ Green Perception Under Urban–Rural Differences: A Socio-Ecological Model Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Feng

    (Department of Global Business Graduate School, Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Republic of Korea)

  • Yu Feng

    (Department of Global Business Graduate School, Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Republic of Korea)

  • Ziyang Liu

    (Department of Global Business Graduate School, Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

With the advancement of the global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), residents’ green perception has become a key factor in driving green behavior and the implementation of environmental policies. However, due to differences in socio-economic environments, policy enforcement, and resource accessibility between urban and rural areas, residents’ levels of green perception exhibit significant regional disparities. Based on the Social Ecological Model, this study constructs an analytical framework encompassing the individual, social relationships, community, policy, and organizational levels to systematically explore the multi-level factors influencing urban and rural residents’ green perception. This study collects data through questionnaire surveys and employs Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to validate the relationships between variables at different levels. The findings indicate that residents’ green perception is influenced by multiple interacting factors, among which environmental knowledge and attitudes at the individual level, family support and social networks at the social relationship level, as well as community atmosphere and policy advocacy play particularly significant roles in enhancing green perception. Furthermore, there are distinct differences in the mechanisms of green perception formation between urban and rural residents; urban residents rely more on government policies and green infrastructure, whereas rural residents’ green perception is primarily influenced by community atmosphere and direct environmental experiences. This study deepens the understanding of urban–rural differences in green perception and their driving factors, providing region-specific policy recommendations to promote widespread green behavior, advance ecological civilization construction in both urban and rural areas, and facilitate the achievement of sustainable development goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Feng & Yu Feng & Ziyang Liu, 2025. "Influencing Factors of Residents’ Green Perception Under Urban–Rural Differences: A Socio-Ecological Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-36, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3475-:d:1633972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3475/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3475/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weiting Shan & Chunliang Xiu & Yining Meng, 2022. "How to Design Greenway on Urban Land Utilization: Linking Place Preference, Perceived Health Benefit, and Environmental Perception," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Terzi, Alessio, 2020. "Crafting an effective narrative on the green transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    3. Edison Jair Duque Oliva & Javier A. Sánchez-Torres & Francisco-Javier Arroyo-Cañada & Ana Argila-Irurita & Jaime Gil-La Fuente & Sandra-Milena Palacio-López & Juan-Pablo Arrubla-Zapata, 2024. "Green Buying Behaviour: An Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Laura Pasca, 2022. "Pride and guilt as mediators in the relationship between connection to nature and pro-environmental intention," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Serena Mastria & Alessandro Vezzil & Andrea De Cesarei, 2023. "Going Green: A Review on the Role of Motivation in Sustainable Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Chao Chen & Desheng Li & Jingjing Qian & Ziying Li, 2024. "The Impact of Green Purchase Intention on Compensatory Consumption: The Regulatory Role of Pro-Environmental Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Su Hang & Yang Juntao, 2024. "The Synergistic Effect of Urban Economic, Social and Space Factors on Residential Carbon Emissions: A Case Study on Provincial Capitals in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    8. Shengyue Fan & Shuai Zha & Chenxi Zhao, 2022. "Study on Strategic Interaction between Government and Farmers in Rural Passive Energy Transformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Else Ragni Yttredal & Nathalie Homlong, 2020. "Perception of Sustainable Development in a Local World Heritage Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    11. Nuryazmin Ahmat Zainuri & Norshariani Abd-Rahman & Lilia Halim & Mee Yeang Chan & Nisa Nadirah Mohd Bazari, 2022. "Measuring Pro-Environmental Behavior Triggered by Environmental Values," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Joseph Larmarange & Joël Mossong & Till Bärnighausen & Marie Louise Newell, 2015. "Participation Dynamics in Population-Based Longitudinal HIV Surveillance in Rural South Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Anubha Goel & Usha Iyer-Raniga & Supreme Jain & Asmita Addya & Shivam Srivastava & Ravish Pandey & Shubham Rathi, 2023. "Student Perceptions of Environmental Education in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-22, October.
    14. Si Xie & Ghulam Rasool Madni, 2023. "Impact of Social Media on Young Generation’s Green Consumption Behavior through Subjective Norms and Perceived Green Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    15. Yongsheng Zhang & Ilan Chabay, 2020. "How “Green Knowledge” Influences Sustainability through Behavior Change: Theory and Policy Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-13, August.
    16. Ruixi Zhao & Lu Sun & Xiaolong Zou & Yi Dou, 2021. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Working toward Zero-Waste and Its Indication to Low Carbon City Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.
    17. Huiling Wang & Ying Ma & Shaoxiong Yang & Mansoor Ahmed Koondhar & Rong Kong, 2020. "The Spillover Influence of Household Waste Sorting on Green Consumption Behavior by Mediation of Environmental Concern: Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Dagmara Stangierska & Iwona Kowalczuk & Ksenia Juszczak-Szelągowska & Katarzyna Widera & Weronika Ferenc, 2022. "Urban Environment, Green Urban Areas, and Life Quality of Citizens—The Case of Warsaw," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, September.
    19. Rudy de Barros Ahrens & Luciana da Silva Lirani & Antonio Carlos de Francisco, 2020. "Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-12, October.
    20. Michael R. Cope & Ashley R. Kernan & Scott R. Sanders & Carol Ward, 2022. "Social Sustainability?: Exploring the Relationship between Community Experience and Perceptions of the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-10, February.
    21. Yongliang Yang & Yuting Zhu & Xiaopeng Wang & Yi Li, 2022. "The Perception of Environmental Information Disclosure on Rural Residents’ Pro-Environmental Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-22, June.
    22. Hang Yin & Yixiong Huang & Kuiming Wang, 2021. "How Do Environmental Concerns and Governance Performance Affect Public Environmental Participation: A Case Study of Waste Sorting in Urban China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-16, September.
    23. Ani Qi & Zeyu Ji & Yuanchao Gong & Bo Yang & Yan Sun, 2022. "The Impact of the Gain-Loss Frame on College Students’ Willingness to Participate in the Individual Low-Carbon Behavior Rewarding System (ILBRS): The Mediating Role of Environmental Risk Perception," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, September.
    24. Imran Hossain & Md. Nekmahmud & Maria Fekete-Farkas, 2022. "How Do Environmental Knowledge, Eco-Label Knowledge, and Green Trust Impact Consumers’ Pro-Environmental Behaviour for Energy-Efficient Household Appliances?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, May.
    25. Shijie Li & Yan Xia & Rongbo Xiao & Haiyan Jiang, 2022. "Residents’ Behavioral Intention of Environmental Governance and Its Influencing Factors: Based on a Multidimensional Willingness Measure Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-19, November.
    26. Chan Chen & Jie Li & Jian Huang, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Patterns of Population Aging in Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, November.
    27. Lin, Yongyuan & Shui, Wei & Li, Zhipan & Huang, Shan & Wu, Kexin & Sun, Xiaorui & Liang, Jingchen, 2021. "Green space optimization for rural vitality: Insights for planning and policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    28. Kaiyu Hua & Xinsheng Pang, 2024. "Investigation into the Factors Affecting the Green Consumption Behavior of China Rural Residents in the Context of Dual Carbon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-24, July.
    29. Ting Yue & Qianru Wang & Ruyin Long & Hong Chen & Mengting Li & Haiwen Liu, 2022. "Impact of Urban Residents’ Environmental Cognition on Voluntary Carbon-Reduction Behavior: The Mediating Role of Environmental Emotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    30. Taeuk Kim & Jungwoo Ha, 2022. "An Investigation of Customer Psychological Perceptions of Green Consciousness in a Green Hotel Context: Applying a Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Analysis of Consumers’ Electric Vehicle Purchase Intentions: An Expansion of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, September.
    2. Imran Hossain & Maria Fekete-Farkas & Md. Nekmahmud, 2022. "Purchase Behavior of Energy-Efficient Appliances Contribute to Sustainable Energy Consumption in Developing Country: Moral Norms Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Yongliang Yang & Yuting Zhu & Xiaopeng Wang & Yi Li, 2022. "The Perception of Environmental Information Disclosure on Rural Residents’ Pro-Environmental Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Yuuki Nakano & Hiroki Hondo, 2023. "Narrative or Logical? The Effects of Information Format on Pro-Environmental Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Andrea Guazzini & Giulia Valdrighi & Maria Fiorenza & Mirko Duradoni, 2025. "The Relationship Between Connectedness to Nature and Pro-Environmental Behaviors: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-43, April.
    6. Mayra Samaniego-Arias & Eva Chávez-Rojas & Andrés García-Umaña & Nelson Carrión-Bósquez & Oscar Ortiz-Regalado & Mary Llamo-Burga & Wilfredo Ruiz-García & Santiago Guerrero-Haro & Wladimir Cando-Aguin, 2025. "The Impact of Social Media on the Purchase Intention of Organic Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Xuxi Wang & Jing Tan, 2022. "The Perception and Attitude of Farmers toward Domestic Waste Classifications: A Case Study on Wusheng County, Sichuan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-14, October.
    8. YoungHyun Kim, 2023. "A Study of the Integrated Model with Norm Activation Model and Theory of Planned Behavior: Applying the Green Hotel’s Corporate Social Responsibilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Tran Huy Phuong & Thanh Trung Hieu, 2015. "Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Undergraduate Students in Vietnam: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 46-55, August.
    11. Clara Cardone-Riportella & María José Casasola-Martinez & Isabel Feito-Ruiz, 2014. "Do Entrepreneurs Come From Venus Or Mars? Impact Of Postgraduate Studies: Gender And Family Business Background," Working Papers 14.04, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Financial Economics and Accounting (former Department of Business Administration), revised Sep 2014.
    12. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 0. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    13. Ruijie Zhu & Guojing Zhao & Zehai Long & Yangjie Huang & Zhaoxin Huang, 2022. "Entrepreneurship or Employment? A Survey of College Students’ Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Alsalem, Amani & Fry, Marie-Louise & Thaichon, Park, 2020. "To donate or to waste it: Understanding posthumous organ donation attitude," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 87-97.
    15. Pan, Jing Yu & Liu, Dahai, 2022. "Mask-wearing intentions on airplanes during COVID-19 – Application of theory of planned behavior model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 32-44.
    16. Benoît Lécureux & Adrien Bonnet & Ouassim Manout & Jaâfar Berrada & Louafi Bouzouina, 2022. "Acceptance of Shared Autonomous Vehicles: A Literature Review of stated choice experiments," Working Papers hal-03814947, HAL.
    17. Jacqueline Ruth & Steffen Willwacher & Oliver Korn, 2022. "Acceptance of Digital Sports: A Study Showing the Rising Acceptance of Digital Health Activities Due to the SARS-CoV-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-16, January.
    18. Jariyasunant, Jerald & Carrel, Andre & Ekambaram, Venkatesan & Gaker, David & Sengupta, Raja & Walker, Joan L., 2012. "The Quantified Traveler: Changing transport behavior with personalized travel data feedback," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3047k0dw, University of California Transportation Center.
    19. Brown, Philip & Roper, Simon, 2017. "Innovation and networks in New Zealand farming," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(3), July.
    20. Teodora Roman, 2009. "Study regarding entrepreneurial intentions among students," THE YEARBOOK OF THE "GH. ZANE" INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC RESEARCHES, Gheorghe Zane Institute for Economic and Social Research ( from THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY, JASSY BRANCH), vol. 18, pages 87-94.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3475-:d:1633972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.