IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i20p6644-d655988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Working toward Zero-Waste and Its Indication to Low Carbon City Development

Author

Listed:
  • Ruixi Zhao

    (Business College, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China)

  • Lu Sun

    (School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
    Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA)

  • Xiaolong Zou

    (School of International & Public Affairs, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
    Institute of National Development & Security Studies, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China)

  • Yi Dou

    (Presidential Endowed Chair for “Platinum Society”, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan)

Abstract

Low carbon city development and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission mitigation in urban communities are urgent. There is great potential to improve the GHG inventory at the community level. Meanwhile, building zero-waste cities and improving waste treatment efficiency have been significant environmental issues due to the rapid increase of waste generation. This research aims to develop a community-scale GHG emission inventory of the waste sector and improve its accuracy and consistency through applying the bottom-up approach. This study covers both direct and indirect emissions categories of the waste sector with the goal of building a zero-waste community. Honjo Waseda community, located in Japan, was used as a case study community. Energy consumption waste treatment sectors were evaluated and calculated through first-hand field data. GHG emission estimation of the waste sector included waste incineration, residential wastewater, and waste transport. The highest emissions originated from Beisiagate supermarket due to the large waste amount produced, and the CO 2 -biomass carbon emissions reached approximately 50% of the total emissions. Furthermore, a quantitative analysis of the implementation of new technologies was also conducted. This study created proposals for GHG emission reduction toward a zero-waste community through the comparison of three cases. Case 1 was business as usual; Case 2 proposed a combination of incineration bio-gasification (MBT); Case 3 introduced a combination of solid recovered fuel (SRF) and a bio-gasification system. SRF contributed the most to emission reduction, and Case 3 exhibited the highest energy recovery. Furthermore, comparing the GHG emissions produced by the use of SRF for power generation and heat supply revealed that using SRF as a heat supply reduced more GHG emissions than using SRF for power generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruixi Zhao & Lu Sun & Xiaolong Zou & Yi Dou, 2021. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Working toward Zero-Waste and Its Indication to Low Carbon City Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:20:p:6644-:d:655988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6644/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6644/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oluleye, Gbemi & Jiang, Ning & Smith, Robin & Jobson, Megan, 2017. "A novel screening framework for waste heat utilization technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 367-381.
    2. Cai, Bofeng & Cui, Can & Zhang, Da & Cao, Libin & Wu, Pengcheng & Pang, Lingyun & Zhang, Jihong & Dai, Chunyan, 2019. "China city-level greenhouse gas emissions inventory in 2015 and uncertainty analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Zhu Liu & Dabo Guan & Wei Wei & Steven J. Davis & Philippe Ciais & Jin Bai & Shushi Peng & Qiang Zhang & Klaus Hubacek & Gregg Marland & Robert J. Andres & Douglas Crawford-Brown & Jintai Lin & Hongya, 2015. "Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China," Nature, Nature, vol. 524(7565), pages 335-338, August.
    4. Wiesberg, Igor Lapenda & Brigagão, George Victor & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz F. & de Medeiros, José Luiz, 2019. "Carbon dioxide management via exergy-based sustainability assessment: Carbon Capture and Storage versus conversion to methanol," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 720-732.
    5. Lorraine Sugar & Christopher Kennedy & Edward Leman, 2012. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Chinese Cities," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(4), pages 552-563, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yi Feng & Yu Feng & Ziyang Liu, 2025. "Influencing Factors of Residents’ Green Perception Under Urban–Rural Differences: A Socio-Ecological Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-36, April.
    2. Long Zhang & Wuliyasu Bai & Jingzheng Ren, 2023. "Waste-to-Energy: A Midas Touch for Turning Waste into Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-5, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Jia Shuo & Zhou, H.W. & Meng, Jing & Yang, Q. & Chen, B. & Zhang, Y.Y., 2018. "Carbon emissions and their drivers for a typical urban economy from multiple perspectives: A case analysis for Beijing city," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1076-1086.
    2. Zhao, Ruixi & Pandyaswargo, Andante Hadi & Onoda, Hiroshi, 2024. "A bottom-up approach for greenhouse gas emission estimation at the community level: A case study in Japan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    3. Junbo Wang & Liu Chen & Lu Chen & Xiaohui Zhao & Minxi Wang & Yiyi Ju & Li Xin, 2019. "City-Level Features of Energy Footprints and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Sichuan Province of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Liu, Xiaoyu & Duan, Zhiyuan & Shan, Yuli & Duan, Haiyan & Wang, Shuo & Song, Junnian & Wang, Xian'en, 2019. "Low-carbon developments in Northeast China: Evidence from cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 1019-1033.
    5. Zhou, Ya & Shan, Yuli & Liu, Guosheng & Guan, Dabo, 2018. "Emissions and low-carbon development in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area cities and their surroundings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1683-1692.
    6. Chen, Zeyu & Tang, Yuhong & Shen, Hebin & Liu, Jiali & Hu, Zheng, 2024. "Threshold effects of Government digital development and land resource disparity on Urban carbon efficiency in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    7. Man, Yi & Yan, Yukun & Wang, Xu & Ren, Jingzheng & Xiong, Qingang & He, Zhenglei, 2023. "Overestimated carbon emission of the pulp and paper industry in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    8. Cui, Can & Wang, Zhen & Cai, Bofeng & Peng, Sha & Wang, Yang & Xu, Chengdong, 2021. "Evolution-based CO2 emission baseline scenarios of Chinese cities in 2025," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    9. Chen, Yuhong & Lyu, Yanfeng & Yang, Xiangdong & Zhang, Xiaohong & Pan, Hengyu & Wu, Jun & Lei, Yongjia & Zhang, Yanzong & Wang, Guiyin & Xu, Min & Luo, Hongbin, 2022. "Performance comparison of urea production using one set of integrated indicators considering energy use, economic cost and emissions’ impacts: A case from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    10. Ling Yang & Michael L. Lahr, 2019. "The Drivers of China’s Regional Carbon Emission Change—A Structural Decomposition Analysis from 1997 to 2007," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Chen, Lu & Li, Xin & Liu, Wei & Kang, Xinyu & Zhao, Yifei & Wang, Minxi, 2024. "System dynamics-multiple the objective optimization model for the coordinated development of urban economy-energy-carbon system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    12. Xiao, Huijuan & Wang, Daoping & Qi, Yu & Shao, Shuai & Zhou, Ya & Shan, Yuli, 2021. "The governance-production nexus of eco-efficiency in Chinese resource-based cities: A two-stage network DEA approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    13. An, Runying & Yu, Biying & Li, Ru & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2018. "Potential of energy savings and CO2 emission reduction in China’s iron and steel industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 862-880.
    14. Tong, Zheming & Chen, Yujiao & Malkawi, Ali & Liu, Zhu & Freeman, Richard B., 2016. "Energy saving potential of natural ventilation in China: The impact of ambient air pollution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 660-668.
    15. Mi, Zhifu & Zhang, Yunkun & Guan, Dabo & Shan, Yuli & Liu, Zhu & Cong, Ronggang & Yuan, Xiao-Chen & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2016. "Consumption-based emission accounting for Chinese cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1073-1081.
    16. Zhang, Kun & Cao, Yiyi & Liu, Zhouyi & Zhou, Qi & Qu, Shen & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2024. "Allocation of carbon emission responsibility among Chinese cities guided by economic welfare gains: Case study based on multi-regional input-output analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 376(PA).
    17. Sichen Tao & Yifei Yang & Ruihan Zhao & Hiroyoshi Todo & Zheng Tang, 2024. "Competitive Elimination Improved Differential Evolution for Wind Farm Layout Optimization Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Zhou, Dequn & Zhou, Xiaoyong & Xu, Qing & Wu, Fei & Wang, Qunwei & Zha, Donglan, 2018. "Regional embodied carbon emissions and their transfer characteristics in China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 180-193.
    19. Wu, Dong & Geng, Yong & Pan, Hengyu, 2021. "Whether natural gas consumption bring double dividends of economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions reduction in China?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    20. Jake A. K. Elliott & Andrew S. Ball, 2021. "Selection of Industrial Trade Waste Resource Recovery Technologies—A Systematic Review," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:20:p:6644-:d:655988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.