IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i12p5153-d1416558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Synergistic Effect of Urban Economic, Social and Space Factors on Residential Carbon Emissions: A Case Study on Provincial Capitals in China

Author

Listed:
  • Su Hang

    (Xi’an International Science and Technology Cooperation Base for Technological Innovation in Green Urban-Rural and Land Space Smart Construction, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
    School of International Economics and Business, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea)

  • Yang Juntao

    (Xi’an International Science and Technology Cooperation Base for Technological Innovation in Green Urban-Rural and Land Space Smart Construction, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
    School of Architecture, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

Abstract

Within the context of China’s commitment to carbon reduction goals, particularly in urban areas, addressing carbon emissions stemming from residents’ travel activities assumes paramount significance. Drawing upon established theoretical frameworks, this study advances several hypotheses delineating the determinants of low-carbon behaviors among urban residents. It analyzes panel data from 30 provincial capitals in China using a time–individual dual fixed effects model. This study empirically scrutinizes the posited theoretical model, aiming to elucidate the factors shaping urban residents’ low-carbon behavioral patterns and provide a decision-making basis for low-carbon construction and management of urban space. The findings underscore several notable associations. The disposable income, population density, and urban built-up areas exhibit significant positive correlations with carbon emissions among residents. Conversely, the urban gross domestic product (GDP) displays a significant negative correlation with carbon emissions. Furthermore, a positive correlation is discerned between the expanse of green spaces and the per capita carbon emissions intensity, while the availability of subway systems exhibits a negative correlation with both the per capita public green space area and the carbon emissions intensity. Notably, the configuration intensity of urban bus systems manifests an inverted U-shaped relationship with residents’ carbon emissions intensity. Specifically, within a certain threshold, an escalation in the bus equipment intensity coincides with heightened carbon emission intensity; however, beyond this threshold, a notable reduction in the per capita carbon emissions intensity ensues. Additionally, a U-shaped relationship is observed between the number of urban parks and residents’ carbon emissions intensity, indicating that an increase in parks may not necessarily contribute to carbon reduction efforts. Moreover, a discernible synergy is observed among various factors influencing carbon reduction efforts. These factors encompass residents’ education levels and disposable incomes, the presence of subway and regular public transportation systems, urban land utilization scales, economic development levels, green space provisions, public transportation infrastructure, population densities, and land equilibrium. This interplay underscores the interconnectedness and interdependence of diverse variables in shaping strategies for mitigating carbon emissions within urban contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Su Hang & Yang Juntao, 2024. "The Synergistic Effect of Urban Economic, Social and Space Factors on Residential Carbon Emissions: A Case Study on Provincial Capitals in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5153-:d:1416558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5153/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5153/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ding, Zhihua & Wang, Guangqiang & Liu, Zhenhua & Long, Ruyin, 2017. "Research on differences in the factors influencing the energy-saving behavior of urban and rural residents in China–A case study of Jiangsu Province," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 252-259.
    2. Meangbua, Onicha & Dhakal, Shobhakar & Kuwornu, John K.M., 2019. "Factors influencing energy requirements and CO2 emissions of households in Thailand: A panel data analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 521-531.
    3. Yan SUN & Yu ZHANG & Xuemin LIU, 2020. "Driving Factors of Transportation CO2 Emissions in Beijing: An Analysis from the Perspective of Urban Development," Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies (CJUES), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(03), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Dantong Wang & Chun Yuan, 2018. "Modeling and forecasting household energy consumption and related CO2 emissions integrating UrbanSim and transportation models: an Atlanta BeltLine case study," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 448-462, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang Yang & Hao Gao & Feng Gao & Yawei Du & Parastoo Maleki, 2024. "Carbon Resilience of University Campuses in Response to Carbon Risks: Connotative Characteristics, Influencing Factors, and Optimization Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Yi Feng & Yu Feng & Ziyang Liu, 2025. "Influencing Factors of Residents’ Green Perception Under Urban–Rural Differences: A Socio-Ecological Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-36, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Bin & Lin, Boqiang, 2018. "Do we really understand the development of China's new energy industry?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 733-745.
    2. Yang, Aoxi & Wang, Yahui, 2023. "Transition of household cooking energy in China since the 1980s," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    3. Liying Wang & Junya Wang & Pengxia Shen & Shangqing Liu & Shuwei Zhang, 2023. "Low-Carbon Travel Behavior in Daily Residence and Tourism Destination: Based on TPB-ABC Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Chen, Peipei & Wu, Yi & Zhong, Honglin & Long, Yin & Meng, Jing, 2022. "Exploring household emission patterns and driving factors in Japan using machine learning methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    5. Lei Zhao & Yongqi Zhang & Haixia Zhang, 2022. "Research on the Impact of Digital Literacy on Farmer Households’ Green Cooking Energy Consumption: Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Renan Magalhães & Jens Lowitzsch & Federico Narracci, 2025. "How (Co-)Ownership in Renewables Improves Heating Usage Behaviour and the Willingness to Adopt Energy-Efficient Technologies—Data from German Households," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-26, June.
    7. Iania, Leonardo & Algieri, Bernardina & Leccadito, Arturo, 2022. "Forecasting total energy’s CO2 emissions," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2022003, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    8. Liu, Yang & Yang, Yugang, 2025. "Carbon literacy, switching cost, and consumer choice: Evidence from the new energy vehicle purchase analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    9. Liping Zhu & Zhizhong Li & Xubiao Yang & Yili Zhang & Hui Li, 2022. "Forecast of Transportation CO 2 Emissions in Shanghai under Multiple Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Wenchao Li & Lingyu Xu & Jian Xu & Ostic Dragana, 2022. "Carbon Reduction Effect of Green Technology Innovation from the Perspective of Energy Consumption and Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Han, Myat Su & Cudjoe, Dan, 2020. "Determinants of energy-saving behavior of urban residents: Evidence from Myanmar," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    12. Jun Fan & Lijuan Peng & Tinggui Chen & Guodong Cong, 2024. "The role of social impact on consumer attitudes toward green and healthy home appliances during the COVID-19 pandemic," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 28063-28105, November.
    13. Lina Liu & Jiansheng Qu & Tek Narayan Maraseni & Yibo Niu & Jingjing Zeng & Lihua Zhang & Li Xu, 2020. "Household CO 2 Emissions: Current Status and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Hongguang Nie & René Kemp & Véronique Vasseur, 2020. "Exploring the Changing Gap of Residential Energy Consumption per Capita in China and the Netherlands: A Comparative Analysis of Driving Forces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Wang, Xiaozhen & Zheng, Ying & Jiang, Zihao & Tao, Ziyang, 2021. "Influence mechanism of subsidy policy on household photovoltaic purchase intention under an urban-rural divide in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    16. Kangjuan Lv & Furong Sun & Lisha Wang, 2023. "Spatial compactness and carbon emission: Nighttime light satellite‐based exposure assessment," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(9), pages 2089-2105, December.
    17. Lanlan Li & Huayang Ming & Ranran Yang & Xuan Luo, 2020. "The Impact of Policy Factors and Users’ Awareness on Electricity-Saving Behaviors: From the Perspective of Habits and Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Yuhao Yang & Ruixi Dong & Xiaoyan Ren & Mengze Fu, 2024. "Exploring Sustainable Planning Strategies for Carbon Emission Reduction in Beijing’s Transportation Sector: A Multi-Scenario Carbon Peak Analysis Using the Extended STIRPAT Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, May.
    19. Yin-Run Yang & Jian Zuo & Min Pan & Rui-Dong Chang & Zhuo-Jing Zou & Ronald J. Webber & Na Dong, 2025. "Analysis of stakeholder-associated factors and their interactions in energy conservation behaviour of occupants: evidence from network analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(8), pages 19517-19552, August.
    20. Wang, Shanyong & Lin, Shoufu & Li, Jun, 2018. "Exploring the effects of non-cognitive and emotional factors on household electricity saving behavior," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 171-180.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5153-:d:1416558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.