IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4510-d1656570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Impact of Government Subsidies on R&D Cost Behavior in the Chinese New Energy Vehicles Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Qianqian Zhang

    (Department of Business Administration, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea)

  • Dong-Il Kim

    (Department of Business Administration, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study investigates whether government subsidies promote R&D cost stickiness in the new energy vehicle (NEV) industry in China—that is, whether public funding encourages firms to retain R&D resources even during periods of declining sales. While prior literature primarily explores the relationship between subsidies and R&D investment levels, it often overlooks firms’ financial position and dynamic cost behaviors. Given that R&D investment has high adjustment costs and is sensitive to cash flows, reductions in R&D spending during downturns may reflect managerial cost asymmetry rather than a crowding-out effect of subsidies. Moreover, government subsidies may serve as a signal of long-term market optimism, motivating managers to retain R&D resources during economic downturns. Using a panel dataset of 573 listed new energy vehicle (NEV) firms in China’s A-share market from 2007 to 2021, we construct a model based on the asymmetric cost behavior framework to empirically assess the impact of government subsidies on R&D cost stickiness. The results show that government subsidies significantly increase the degree of R&D cost stickiness. Serving as a signal of future market optimism, subsidies raise managerial expectations and incentivize decisions to retain R&D-related costs during economic downturns. This positive relationship is more pronounced in firms with high levels of green innovation, large-scale enterprises, and non-state-owned firms. These findings suggest that public funding alleviates managerial pressure to cut R&D expenses amid revenue declines, thereby supporting firms’ long-term innovation strategies. Our study contributes to the cost management literature by highlighting a novel channel through which subsidies influence managerial discretion under uncertainty. It also provides policy implications for the future phase-out of subsidies, emphasizing the need for complementary market mechanisms to sustain innovation investment, particularly for small, young, and financially constrained firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Qianqian Zhang & Dong-Il Kim, 2025. "Exploring the Impact of Government Subsidies on R&D Cost Behavior in the Chinese New Energy Vehicles Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4510-:d:1656570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4510/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4510/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shrestha, Anil & Mustafa, Andy Ali & Htike, Myo Myo & You, Vithyea & Kakinaka, Makoto, 2022. "Evolution of energy mix in emerging countries: Modern renewable energy, traditional renewable energy, and non-renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 419-432.
    2. Akhtaruzzaman, Md & Banerjee, Ameet Kumar & Boubaker, Sabri, 2025. "Government intervention and green innovation in renewable energy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    3. Mamuneas, Theofanis P. & Ishaq Nadiri, M., 1996. "Public R&D policies and cost behavior of the US manufacturing industries," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 57-81, December.
    4. González, Xulia & Pazó, Consuelo, 2008. "Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 371-389, April.
    5. Jiang, Zhangsheng & Xu, Chenghao, 2023. "Policy incentives, government subsidies, and technological innovation in new energy vehicle enterprises: Evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    6. Jensen, Michael C, 1986. "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(2), pages 323-329, May.
    7. Mark C. Anderson & Rajiv D. Banker & Surya N. Janakiraman, 2003. "Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs “Sticky”?," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(1), pages 47-63, March.
    8. Khezri, Mohsen & Heshmati, Almas & Khodaei, Mehdi, 2021. "The role of R&D in the effectiveness of renewable energy determinants: A spatial econometric analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Yu, Feifei & Guo, Yue & Le-Nguyen, Khuong & Barnes, Stuart J. & Zhang, Weiting, 2016. "The impact of government subsidies and enterprises’ R&D investment: A panel data study from renewable energy in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 106-113.
    10. Chang, Kai & Wan, Qiong & Lou, Qichun & Chen, Yili & Wang, Weihong, 2020. "Green fiscal policy and firms’ investment efficiency: New insights into firm-level panel data from the renewable energy industry in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 589-597.
    11. Bronwyn H. Hall & Zvi Griliches & Jerry A. Hausman, 1984. "Patents and R&D: Is There A Lag?," NBER Working Papers 1454, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Zvi Griliches, 1998. "Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth," NBER Chapters, in: R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pages 17-45, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Wu, Aihua, 2017. "The signal effect of Government R&D Subsidies in China: Does ownership matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 339-345.
    14. Mabel D Costa & Ahsan Habib, 2023. "Cost stickiness and firm value," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 235-273, June.
    15. Grubler, Arnulf & Nakicenovic, Nebojsa & Victor, David G., 1999. "Dynamics of energy technologies and global change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 247-280, May.
    16. Bointner, Raphael, 2014. "Innovation in the energy sector: Lessons learnt from R&D expenditures and patents in selected IEA countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 733-747.
    17. Sabine Messner, 1997. "Endogenized technological learning in an energy systems model," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 291-313.
    18. Rajiv D. Banker & Rong Huang & Ramachandran Natarajan, 2011. "Equity Incentives and Long†Term Value Created by SG&A Expenditure," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 794-830, September.
    19. Wan-Shu Wu & Kai Zhao, 2022. "Government R&D subsidies and enterprise R&D activities: theory and evidence," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 391-408, December.
    20. Kleer, Robin, 2010. "Government R&D subsidies as a signal for private investors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 1361-1374, December.
    21. V. K. Narayanan & George E. Pinches & Kathryn M. Kelm & Diane M. Lander, 2000. "The influence of voluntarily disclosed qualitative information," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(7), pages 707-722, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Wenxiao & Song, Yi & Xu, Deyi & Zhang, Yijun, 2025. "Government subsidies and industrial chain resilience: Evidence from Chinese resource-based enterprises," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Shiyuan Liu & Jiang Du & Weike Zhang & Xiaoli Tian, 2021. "Opening the box of subsidies: which is more effective for innovation?," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(3), pages 421-449, September.
    3. Duan, Yu & Xi, Bin & Xu, Xin & Xuan, Siyuan, 2024. "The impact of government subsidies on green innovation performance in new energy enterprises: A digital transformation perspective," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Mahmoud Agha & Baban Eulaiwi, 2020. "The alignment effects of CEO stock incentives in the presence of government ownership: International evidence from Gulf Cooperation Council countries," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(2), pages 195-222, May.
    5. Li, Tongxia & Lu, Chun & Chen, Zhihua, 2023. "The unintended consequence of collateral-based financing: Evidence from corporate cost behavior," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    6. Bettina Becker, 2013. "The Determinants of R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Research," Discussion Paper Series 2013_09, Department of Economics, Loughborough University, revised Sep 2013.
    7. Liping Wu & Kai Hu & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko & Ishfaq Hamid, 2022. "The Impact of Government Subsidies on Technological Innovation in Agribusiness: The Case for China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Natasha Hazarika, 2021. "R&D Intensity and Its Curvilinear Relationship with Firm Profitability: Perspective from the Alternative Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Bai, Rui & Lin, Boqiang & Liu, Xiying, 2021. "Government subsidies and firm-level renewable energy investment: New evidence from partially linear functional-coefficient models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    10. Li, Yafei & Dong, Xiaoqi & Sun, Jinping, 2024. "R&D project subsidy V.S. government innovation reward: The effectiveness on corporate innovation," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    11. Shoichiro Hosomi & Gongye Ge, 2025. "The Impact of Cost Stickiness on R&D Investment and Corporate Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Japanese Firms," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-27, July.
    12. Luo, Lianfa & Cheng, Zhiming & Ye, Qingqing & Cheng, Yanjun & Smyth, Russell & Yang, Zhiqing & Zhang, Le, 2024. "Nonmonetary awards and innovation: Evidence from winning China's Top Brand Contest," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    13. Chia-Hsin Chiang & Helen Choy & Yan-Jie Yang & Shu-Ling Yeh, 2025. "Strategic alignment between supply chain partners and cost stickiness of suppliers," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 941-999, February.
    14. Grafström, Jonas & Poudineh, Rahmat, 2023. "No evidence of counteracting policy effects on European solar power invention and diffusion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    15. Stavins, Robert & Jaffe, Adam & Newell, Richard, 2000. "Technological Change and the Environment," Working Paper Series rwp00-002, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    16. Dominique Guellec & Bruno Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, 2004. "From R&D to Productivity Growth: Do the Institutional Settings and the Source of Funds of R&D Matter?," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 66(3), pages 353-378, July.
    17. Raymond, Wladimir & Mairesse, Jacques & Mohnen, Pierre & Palm, Franz, 2015. "Dynamic models of R & D, innovation and productivity: Panel data evidence for Dutch and French manufacturing," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 285-306.
    18. Dirk Czarnitzki & Julie Delanote, 2017. "Incorporating innovation subsidies in the CDM framework: empirical evidence from Belgium," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1-2), pages 78-92, February.
    19. Emmanuel Chavez, 2020. "The Effects of Public R&D Subsidies on Private R&D Activities in Mexico," Working Papers halshs-02355106, HAL.
    20. Oh, Seungbin & Choi, Ahrum, 2025. "How does divergence of control and cash-flow rights influence cost stickiness?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(3).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4510-:d:1656570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.