IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i7p388-d1701042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Cost Stickiness on R&D Investment and Corporate Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Japanese Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Shoichiro Hosomi

    (Graduate School of Management, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan)

  • Gongye Ge

    (Graduate School of Management, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan)

Abstract

This study examines the impact of cost stickiness on research and development (R&D) investment and corporate performance in Japanese firms. Additionally, it investigates the moderating effect of managerial overconfidence and financial slack. To do so, we analysed a sample of 4877 observations from Japanese firms listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange between 2014 and 2020. The results show that cost stickiness generally promotes R&D investment while negatively affecting corporate performance. Further, although managerial overconfidence does not moderate the relationship between cost stickiness and R&D investment, it weakens the negative effect of cost stickiness on corporate performance. Meanwhile, financial slack strengthens the positive impact of cost stickiness on R&D investment, but it does not moderate the relationship between cost stickiness and corporate performance. These findings provide strategic insights into resource allocation behaviour in driving innovation and influencing corporate outcomes in the Japanese market context.

Suggested Citation

  • Shoichiro Hosomi & Gongye Ge, 2025. "The Impact of Cost Stickiness on R&D Investment and Corporate Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Japanese Firms," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-27, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:388-:d:1701042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/7/388/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/7/388/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jensen, Michael C, 1986. "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(2), pages 323-329, May.
    2. Mabel D Costa & Ahsan Habib, 2023. "Cost stickiness and firm value," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 235-273, June.
    3. Beladi, Hamid & Deng, Jie & Hu, May, 2021. "Cash flow uncertainty, financial constraints and R&D investment," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    4. Tolossa Fufa Guluma, 2021. "The impact of corporate governance measures on firm performance: the influences of managerial overconfidence," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Mark C. Anderson & Rajiv D. Banker & Surya N. Janakiraman, 2003. "Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs “Sticky”?," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(1), pages 47-63, March.
    6. Clara Xiaoling Chen & Hai Lu & Theodore Sougiannis, 2012. "The Agency Problem, Corporate Governance, and the Asymmetrical Behavior of Selling, General, and Administrative Costs," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 252-282, March.
    7. Simon Gervais & J. B. Heaton & Terrance Odean, 2011. "Overconfidence, Compensation Contracts, and Capital Budgeting," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 66(5), pages 1735-1777, October.
    8. Lin, Yini & Wu, Lei-Yu, 2014. "Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 407-413.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oh, Seungbin & Choi, Ahrum, 2025. "How does divergence of control and cash-flow rights influence cost stickiness?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(3).
    2. Ahemed, Agha Mureed & Iqbal, Umer & Atif, Mian Muhammad, 2025. "Asymmetric cost behavior and financial distress," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    3. Md. Mahmudul Hasan & Md. Safayat Hossain & David R. Tree, 2024. "Executives' horizon and trade credit," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(1), pages 1135-1157, March.
    4. Davood Askarany & Mona Parsaei & Nilofar Ghanbari, 2024. "Business Strategy, Short-Term Debt, and Cost Stickiness," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(3), pages 1913-1936, September.
    5. Mahmoud Agha & Baban Eulaiwi, 2020. "The alignment effects of CEO stock incentives in the presence of government ownership: International evidence from Gulf Cooperation Council countries," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(2), pages 195-222, May.
    6. Jeon, Heung-Jae, 2024. "CEO narcissism and asymmetric cost behavior," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    7. Alqahtani, Jubran & Duong, Lien & Taylor, Grantley & Eulaiwi, Baban, 2022. "Outside directors, firm life cycle, corporate financial decisions and firm performance," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    8. Xu, Hui & Chan, Kam C. & Na, Chaohong & Fang, Qiaoling, 2023. "The bright side of the internal labor market: Evidence from the labor cost stickiness of firms affiliated with privately owned business groups in China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    9. Li, Tongxia & Lu, Chun & Chen, Zhihua, 2023. "The unintended consequence of collateral-based financing: Evidence from corporate cost behavior," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    10. Mabel D Costa & Ahsan Habib, 2023. "Cost stickiness and firm value," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 235-273, June.
    11. Chung, Chune Young & Hur, Seok-Kyun & Liu, Chang, 2019. "Institutional investors and cost stickiness: Theory and evidence," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 336-350.
    12. Fangjun Wang & Lizhu Ma & Baojun Gao & Yang S Liu, 2024. "Does high-speed railway affect the cost behavior of tourism firms? Evidence from China," Tourism Economics, , vol. 30(1), pages 212-235, February.
    13. Xiaowei Ma & Wanwan Ma & Xin Zhao & Xiaoxiao Zhou & Kamel Si Mohammed, 2024. "Increasing Burdens or Reducing Costs: Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Cost Stickiness," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 2136-2155, March.
    14. Qianqian Zhang & Dong-Il Kim, 2025. "Exploring the Impact of Government Subsidies on R&D Cost Behavior in the Chinese New Energy Vehicles Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.
    15. Kitching, Karen & Mashruwala, Raj & Pevzner, Mikhail, 2016. "Culture and Cost Stickiness: A Cross-country Study," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 402-417.
    16. Mabel D. Costa & Ahsan Habib & Md. Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan, 2021. "Financial constraints and asymmetric cost behavior," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 33-83, March.
    17. Chune Young Chung & Changhwan Choi & Amirhossein Fard, 2024. "Self‐serving attribution and managerial investment decision," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(3), pages 749-772, July.
    18. Li, Mengzhe & Guo, Siyuan & Wang, Xizi & Liu, Yingqi, 2024. "Increase or decrease: Customer digital transformation and supplier cost stickiness," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    19. Yuwen Cai & Nijat Hajikhanov & Thomas Kaspereit & Anke Müßig, 2024. "Local party committee and labor cost asymmetry," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 371-403, September.
    20. Zeng, Jing & Peng, Meng & Chan, Kam C., 2024. "The impact of low-carbon city policy on corporate cost stickiness," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:388-:d:1701042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.