IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4392-d1654167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peer Effects on ESG Disclosure: Drivers and Implications for Sustainable Corporate Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Donghui Zhao

    (UKM-Graduate School of Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Sue Lin Ngan

    (UKM-Graduate School of Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Ainul Huda Jamil

    (UKM-Graduate School of Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Mohd Fairuz Md Salleh

    (UKM-Graduate School of Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Wan Sallha Yusoff

    (Centre of Excellence Social Innovation and Sustainability, Faculty of Business & Communication, University Malaysia Perlis, Pauh Putra Campus, Kangar 02600, Perlis, Malaysia)

Abstract

Amid growing global concerns regarding sustainable governance, understanding the drivers of ESG disclosure is vital for promoting transparency and responsible corporate behavior. This study examines the peer effects of ESG disclosure among 32,187 observations from Chinese A-share listed firms between 2010 and 2021. This research employs an instrumental variable approach based on stock-specific idiosyncratic returns estimated via the Carhart four-factor model to address endogeneity concerns. The results confirm significant peer effects, suggesting that firms adjust ESG practices in response to their industry counterparts. These effects are significantly moderated by firm-level characteristics, including information asymmetry, corporate reputation, and market competition, as well as by external conditions such as economic policy uncertainty, business environment volatility, and institutional quality. This research defines peer groups by industry affiliation and conducts robustness tests using ESG risk clustering to address classification bias. This study contributes to the literature by strengthening causal inference and refining the understanding of peer-driven ESG behavior by integrating institutional theory, signaling theory, and information economics. The findings offer practical implications for policymakers, investors, and corporate managers seeking to promote ESG convergence through peer-driven incentives in diverse regulatory contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Donghui Zhao & Sue Lin Ngan & Ainul Huda Jamil & Mohd Fairuz Md Salleh & Wan Sallha Yusoff, 2025. "Peer Effects on ESG Disclosure: Drivers and Implications for Sustainable Corporate Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4392-:d:1654167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4392/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4392/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark T. Leary & Michael R. Roberts, 2014. "Do Peer Firms Affect Corporate Financial Policy?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(1), pages 139-178, February.
    2. Charles F. Manski, 1993. "Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 60(3), pages 531-542.
    3. Ghosh, Dipankar & Olsen, Lori, 2009. "Environmental uncertainty and managers' use of discretionary accruals," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 188-205, February.
    4. Philip Fliegel, 2025. "How (Not) to Measure Companies' Climate Transition Risk: A Framework and Categorized Literature Review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3049-3077, May.
    5. Wu, Yizhong & Lee, Chien-Chiang & Lee, Chi-Chuan & Peng, Diyun, 2022. "Geographic proximity and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from high-speed rail construction in China," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    6. Armin Falk & Andrea Ichino, 2006. "Clean Evidence on Peer Effects," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 24(1), pages 39-58, January.
    7. Li Long & Chunze Wang & Min Zhang, 2025. "Does Social Media Pressure Induce Corporate Hypocrisy? Evidence of ESG Greenwashing from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(2), pages 311-338, March.
    8. Manfred Schwaiger, 2004. "Components And Parameters Of Corporate Reputation – An Empirical Study," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 56(1), pages 46-71, January.
    9. Danny Zhao‐Xiang Huang, 2022. "Environmental, social and governance factors and assessing firm value: valuation, signalling and stakeholder perspectives," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1983-2010, April.
    10. Stefano Romito & Clodia Vurro, 2021. "Non‐financial disclosure and information asymmetry: A stakeholder view on US listed firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 595-605, March.
    11. Said Elbanna & John Child, 2007. "The Influence of Decision, Environmental and Firm Characteristics on the Rationality of Strategic Decision‐Making," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 561-591, June.
    12. Rabelo Neto, José & Figueiredo, Claudia & Gabriel, Bárbara Coelho & Valente, Robertt, 2024. "Factors for innovation ecosystem frameworks: Comprehensive organizational aspects for evolution," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    13. Bilyay-Erdogan, Seda & Danisman, Gamze Ozturk & Demir, Ender, 2024. "ESG performance and investment efficiency: The impact of information asymmetry," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Jonathan Michie & Christine Oughton, 2022. "Measuring corporate diversity in financial services: a diversity index," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 308-337, May.
    15. Gerard Hoberg & Gordon Phillips, 2016. "Text-Based Network Industries and Endogenous Product Differentiation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(5), pages 1423-1465.
    16. Sreedhar T. Bharath & Paolo Pasquariello & Guojun Wu, 2009. "Does Asymmetric Information Drive Capital Structure Decisions?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(8), pages 3211-3243, August.
    17. Guangyou Zhou & Lian Liu & Sumei Luo, 2022. "Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3371-3387, November.
    18. Foster, Gigi, 2006. "It's not your peers, and it's not your friends: Some progress toward understanding the educational peer effect mechanism," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(8-9), pages 1455-1475, September.
    19. Li Long & Chunze Wang & Min Zhang, 2025. "Publisher Correction to: Does Social Media Pressure Induce Corporate Hypocrisy? Evidence of ESG Greenwashing from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(2), pages 339-339, March.
    20. Sahin, Özge & Bax, Karoline & Paterlini, Sandra & Czado, Claudia, 2023. "The pitfalls of (non-definitive) Environmental, Social, and Governance scoring methodology," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    21. Lihua Zeng & Hao Li & Liyu Lin & Dora Juan Juan Hu & Hui Liu, 2024. "ESG Standards in China: Bibliometric Analysis, Development Status Research, and Future Research Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    22. Monica Singhania & Neha Saini, 2023. "Institutional framework of ESG disclosures: comparative analysis of developed and developing countries," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 516-559, January.
    23. Ian Berk & Massimo Guidolin & Monia Magnani, 2023. "New ESG rating drivers in the cross‐section of European stock returns," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 46(S1), pages 133-162, December.
    24. David Berlepsch & Fred Lemke & Matthew Gorton, 2024. "The Importance of Corporate Reputation for Sustainable Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review, Bibliometric Mapping, and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 9-34, January.
    25. Yongjun Tang & Jun Zhu & Wenchao Ma & Mengxue Zhao, 2022. "A Study on the Impact of Institutional Pressure on Carbon Information Disclosure: The Mediating Effect of Enterprise Peer Influence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Bin & Pan, Ailing & Xu, Lei & Liu, Xin & Qin, Shuqian, 2020. "Imprinting and peer effects in acquiring state ownership: Evidence from private firms in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    2. Adhikari, Binay K. & Agrawal, Anup, 2018. "Peer influence on payout policies," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 615-637.
    3. Chang, Liang & Tan, Na & Zhang, Xinyue & Yuan, Yiyun, 2023. "Does peer firms’ tone affect corporate investment? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. M. Cecilia Bustamante & Laurent Frésard, 2021. "Does Firm Investment Respond to Peers’ Investment?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4703-4724, August.
    5. Rind, Asad Ali & Abbassi, Wajih & Allaya, Manel & Hammouda, Amira, 2022. "Local peers and firm misconduct: The role of sustainability and competition," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Paul Décaire & Erik P. Gilje & Jérôme P. Taillard, 2019. "Real Option Exercise: Empirical Evidence," NBER Working Papers 25624, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Nickolay Gantchev & Oleg R Gredil & Chotibhak Jotikasthira, 2019. "Governance under the Gun: Spillover Effects of Hedge Fund Activism," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 23(6), pages 1031-1068.
    8. Aghamolla, Cyrus & Thakor, Richard T., 2022. "IPO peer effects," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 206-226.
    9. Ajirloo, Bahman Fathi & Switzer, Lorne N., 2022. "Self-disclosed peer effects on corporate capital structure," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    10. Zhuang, Yuan & Nie, Jing & Wu, Weixing, 2022. "Peer influence and the value of cash holdings," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 265-284.
    11. Hsu, Yuan-Teng & Huang, Chia-Wei & Koedijk, Kees G., 2023. "Unintended consequences of compensation peer groups on corporate innovation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Liu, Yongda & Padgett, Carol & Yin, Chao, 2022. "Internal information quality and financial policy peer effects," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. William Grieser & James LeSage & Morad Zekhnini, 2022. "Industry Networks and the Geography of Firm Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 6163-6183, August.
    14. Cave, Joshua & Lancheros, Sandra, 2024. "Local peer influence on dividend payout decisions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    15. Wang, Jiaxin & Wu, Guilin & Huang, Xiang & Sun, Di & Song, Zilong, 2023. "Peer effects of corporate product quality information disclosure: Learning and competition," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    16. David Pascual-Ezama & Derek Dunfield & Beatriz Gil-Gómez de Liaño & Drazen Prelec, 2015. "Peer Effects in Unethical Behavior: Standing or Reputation?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    17. Eisenkopf, Gerald, 2010. "Peer effects, motivation, and learning," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 364-374, June.
    18. Dasgupta, Sudipto & Banerjee, Shantanu & SHI, RUI & Yan, Jiali, 2021. "Information Complementarities and the Dynamics of Transparency Shock Spillovers," CEPR Discussion Papers 15658, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Khoo, Joye & Cheung, Adrian (Wai Kong), 2024. "Firms' organisation capital: Do peers matter?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    20. Patrick J. Callery, 2024. "Strategic motivations for corporate social responsibility: profitability or legitimacy?," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 94(6), pages 947-974, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4392-:d:1654167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.