IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2289-d1047525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Green Finance and Green Technology Innovation Impact the Yangtze River Economic Belt’s Industrial Structure Upgrading in China? A Moderated Mediation Effect Model Based on Provincial Panel Data

Author

Listed:
  • Ning Zhang

    (School of Accounting and Auditing, Nanjing Audit University Jinshen College, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Jinhua Sun

    (School of Law and Business, Sanjiang University, Nanjing 210012, China)

  • Yu Tang

    (Allbright Law Offices (Nanjing), Nanjing 210019, China)

  • Jianqun Zhang

    (School of Languages and Communication Studies, Bejing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Valentina Boamah

    (School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Decai Tang

    (School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Xiaoxue Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Heihe University, Heihe 164300, China)

Abstract

Industrial structure upgrading is a huge driving force for China’s green economic development. The Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB), a crucial component of China’s spatial economic pattern, is facing the dual pressure of economic development and environmental protection. Therefore, it needs to have its industrial structure upgraded immediately. This article measures the development levels of green finance using the entropy method and bases its analysis on the panel data of 11 provinces (municipalities) in the YREB from 2005 to 2019. A moderated mediating effect model is then built to thoroughly examine the influence paths of green finance and green technology innovation on industrial structure upgrading. According to the empirical findings, green finance and green technology innovation have a significant direct role in promoting the upgrading of industrial structures. They reflect significant regional disparities across the East, Midland, and West. Second, green technology innovation has an effective transmission mechanism in green finance, boosting industrial structure upgrading. Third, environmental regulations positively regulate green finance’s direct and indirect routes to support industrial structure upgrading. This study is the first to combine green finance, green technology innovation, environmental regulation, and industrial structure upgrading under one research framework, broadening the research scope of industrial transformation. These research findings provide theoretical and practical guidance for upgrading China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt’s industrial structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Ning Zhang & Jinhua Sun & Yu Tang & Jianqun Zhang & Valentina Boamah & Decai Tang & Xiaoxue Zhang, 2023. "How Do Green Finance and Green Technology Innovation Impact the Yangtze River Economic Belt’s Industrial Structure Upgrading in China? A Moderated Mediation Effect Model Based on Provincial Panel Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2289-:d:1047525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2289/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2289/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wurgler, Jeffrey, 2000. "Financial markets and the allocation of capital," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1-2), pages 187-214.
    2. Xie, Ronghui & Teo, Thompson S.H., 2022. "Green technology innovation, environmental externality, and the cleaner upgrading of industrial structure in China — Considering the moderating effect of environmental regulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Su, Yi & Fan, Qi-ming, 2022. "Renewable energy technology innovation, industrial structure upgrading and green development from the perspective of China's provinces," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    4. Yong Fang & Zhenquan Shao, 2022. "Whether Green Finance Can Effectively Moderate the Green Technology Innovation Effect of Heterogeneous Environmental Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Jinhua Sun & Decai Tang & Haojia Kong & Valentina Boamah, 2022. "Impact of Industrial Structure Upgrading on Green Total Factor Productivity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Heidi A. Pickman, 1998. "The effect of environmental regulation on environmental innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(4), pages 223-233, September.
    7. L. Rachel Ngai & Christopher A. Pissarides, 2007. "Structural Change in a Multisector Model of Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(1), pages 429-443, March.
    8. Ming Yi & Yiqian Wang & Modan Yan & Lina Fu & Yao Zhang, 2020. "Government R&D Subsidies, Environmental Regulations, and Their Effect on Green Innovation Efficiency of Manufacturing Industry: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Yuan, Chaoqing & Liu, Sifeng & Wu, Junlong, 2009. "Research on energy-saving effect of technological progress based on Cobb-Douglas production function," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 2842-2846, August.
    10. Ge, Tao & Cai, Xuesen & Song, Xiaowei, 2022. "How does renewable energy technology innovation affect the upgrading of industrial structure? The moderating effect of green finance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 1106-1114.
    11. Decai Tang & Zhangming Shan & Junxia He & Ziqian Zhao, 2022. "How Do Environmental Regulations and Outward Foreign Direct Investment Impact the Green Total Factor Productivity in China? A Mediating Effect Test Based on Provincial Panel Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-32, November.
    12. Yu, Chin-Hsien & Wu, Xiuqin & Zhang, Dayong & Chen, Shi & Zhao, Jinsong, 2021. "Demand for green finance: Resolving financing constraints on green innovation in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    13. Meili Tang & Jia’ni Ding & Haojia Kong & Brandon J. Bethel & Decai Tang, 2022. "Influence of Green Finance on Ecological Environment Quality in Yangtze River Delta," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, August.
    14. Yang, Chih-Hai & Tseng, Yu-Hsuan & Chen, Chiang-Ping, 2012. "Environmental regulations, induced R&D, and productivity: Evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing industries," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 514-532.
    15. Enxian Wang & Xinghe Liu & Jiapeng Wu & Danting Cai, 2019. "Green Credit, Debt Maturity, and Corporate Investment—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Wu, Ning & Liu, ZuanKuo, 2021. "Higher education development, technological innovation and industrial structure upgrade," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    17. Wang, Xinyue & Wang, Qing, 2021. "Research on the impact of green finance on the upgrading of China's regional industrial structure from the perspective of sustainable development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    18. Wang, Rong & Tan, Junlan, 2021. "Exploring the coupling and forecasting of financial development, technological innovation, and economic growth," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    19. Hamamoto, Mitsutsugu, 2006. "Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 299-312, November.
    20. Hu, Dianxi & Jiao, Jianling & Tang, Yunshu & Xu, Yuwen & Zha, Jianrui, 2022. "How global value chain participation affects green technology innovation processes: A moderated mediation model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    21. Zhai, Xueqi & An, Yunfei, 2021. "The relationship between technological innovation and green transformation efficiency in China: An empirical analysis using spatial panel data," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kai Zhang & Dongyuan Liu, 2023. "Does Green Finance Promote Export Sophistication? An Analysis of the Moderating Effect Based on Green Taxes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Xinyu Xie & Ying Zhang & Xiaoping Qiu, 2023. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Rural Governance Demonstration Villages in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Fuhao & Lou, Runchi & Wang, Keying, 2023. "How does green finance drive the decarbonization of the economy? Empirical evidence from China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 671-684.
    2. Xiaoling Zhang & Zhangming Shan & Xuerong Wang & Decai Tang, 2023. "The Impact of Green Finance on Upgrading the Manufacturing Industry of the Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on the Spatial Econometric Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Xie, Ronghui & Teo, Thompson S.H., 2022. "Green technology innovation, environmental externality, and the cleaner upgrading of industrial structure in China — Considering the moderating effect of environmental regulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    4. Xiuping Li & Ye Yang, 2022. "Does Green Finance Contribute to Corporate Technological Innovation? The Moderating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Shi, Jinyan & Yu, Conghui & Li, Yanxi & Wang, Tianhe, 2022. "Does green financial policy affect debt-financing cost of heavy-polluting enterprises? An empirical evidence based on Chinese pilot zones for green finance reform and innovations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    6. Cai, Hechang & Wang, Zilong & Zhang, Zhiwen & Xu, Liuyang, 2023. "Does environmental regulation promote technology transfer? Evidence from a partially linear functional-coefficient panel model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    7. Tian, Ying & Pang, Jun, 2023. "What causes dynamic change of green technology progress: Convergence analysis based on industrial restructuring and environmental regulation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 189-199.
    8. Liu, Yang & Zhao, Xiaomeng & Dong, Kangyin & Jiang, Qingzhe, 2023. "Assessing the role of green finance in sustainable energy investments by power utilities: Evidence from China," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    9. Lei Nie & Purong Chen & Xiuli Liu & Qinqin Shi & Jing Zhang, 2022. "Coupling and Coordinative Development of Green Finance and Industrial-Structure Optimization in China: Spatial-Temporal Difference and Driving Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-22, September.
    10. Xiaoyang Xu & Yufan Xie & Emma Serwaa Obobisa & Huaping Sun, 2023. "Has the establishment of green finance reform and innovation pilot zones improved air quality? Evidence from China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Jing Sun & Ningning Zhai & Jichao Miao & Huaping Sun, 2022. "Can Green Finance Effectively Promote the Carbon Emission Reduction in “Local-Neighborhood” Areas?—Empirical Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, September.
    12. Guo, Shu & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2023. "Green credit policy and total factor productivity: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    13. He, Yiqing & Ding, Xin & Yang, Chuchu, 2021. "Do environmental regulations and financial constraints stimulate corporate technological innovation? Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    14. Chien, Fengsheng & Anwar, Ahsan & Hsu, Ching-Chi & Sharif, Arshian & Razzaq, Asif & Sinha, Avik, 2021. "The role of information and communication technology in encountering environmental degradation: Proposing an SDG framework for the BRICS countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    15. Zhang, Yijun & Li, Xiaoping & Song, Yi & Jiang, Feitao, 2021. "Can green industrial policy improve total factor productivity? Firm-level evidence from China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 51-62.
    16. Roberto Antonietti & Alberto Marzucchi, 2013. "Green Investment Strategies and Export Performance: A Firm-level Investigation," Working Papers 2013.76, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    17. Johan Brolund & Robert Lundmark, 2017. "Effect of Environmental Regulation Stringency on the Pulp and Paper Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Oberndorfer, Ulrich & Moslener, Ulf & Böhringer, Christoph & Ziegler, Andreas, 2008. "Clean and Productive? Evidence from the German Manufacturing Industry," ZEW Discussion Papers 08-091, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    19. Qi, Xiulin & Wu, Zhifang & Xu, Jinqing & Shan, Biaoan, 2023. "Environmental justice and green innovation: A quasi-natural experiment based on the establishment of environmental courts in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    20. Fan Wang & Lili Feng & Jin Li & Lin Wang, 2020. "Environmental Regulation, Tenure Length of Officials, and Green Innovation of Enterprises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2289-:d:1047525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.