IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12161-d1213436.html

To Green or Not to Green: The E-Commerce-Delivery Question

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Villa

    (School of Technology and Science, Camilo José Cela University, 28692 Madrid, Spain)

  • Marta Serrano

    (School of Technology and Science, Camilo José Cela University, 28692 Madrid, Spain)

  • Tomás García

    (School of Technology and Science, Camilo José Cela University, 28692 Madrid, Spain)

  • Gema González

    (School of Technology and Science, Camilo José Cela University, 28692 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

In an era in which e-commerce has become an integral facet of our lives, the delivery process has evolved into a vital part of online shopping. As the sole tangible interaction in an otherwise digital undertaking, it forms a decisive aspect of consumers’ e-commerce experience. In the face of the ever-growing prevalence of e-commerce, the ecological footprint left by delivery practices has emerged as a pressing concern. This focus is attributed not only to the environmental externalities resulting from e-commerce delivery but also due to the system’s inherent inefficiencies. As the primary beneficiaries of e-commerce, consumers form a pivotal force in driving sustainable delivery initiatives. This study embarks on an exploration of consumers’ attitudes toward environmentally friendly e-commerce-delivery practices. We aim to investigate whether consumers are willing to bear additional costs for assured green deliveries and identify which sustainable practices they perceive as most effective. A survey was conducted among e-commerce users to show their readiness to incur higher costs for green delivery and accept delayed deliveries if they supported sustainability. However, our findings reveal a conflicting scenario. While consumers display a readiness to opt for green deliveries, the price and speed of delivery emerged as more critical considerations. This study also uncovers significant discrepancies in attitudes towards green delivery based on demographic factors, such as gender and generation. Utilizing multivariate logistic regression, the study outlines the main factors that predict a willingness to pay for guaranteed green delivery. This study’s findings stress the need to balance the drive for speed and cost-effectiveness in e-commerce delivery with the urgency to adopt sustainable practices. It underscores the necessity for e-commerce platforms and logistics partners to take the lead in crafting and implementing innovative green delivery solutions while educating and incentivizing consumers to choose sustainable delivery options.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Villa & Marta Serrano & Tomás García & Gema González, 2023. "To Green or Not to Green: The E-Commerce-Delivery Question," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12161-:d:1213436
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12161/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12161/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benedikt M. Brand & Theresa Maria Rausch & Jannika Brandel, 2022. "The Importance of Sustainability Aspects When Purchasing Online: Comparing Generation X and Generation Z," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, May.
    2. Elisa Monnot & Fanny Reniou & Béatrice Parguel & Leila Elgaaied-Gambier, 2019. "“Thinking Outside the Packaging Box”: Should Brands Consider Store Shelf Context When Eliminating Overpackaging?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 355-370, January.
    3. Regina Frei & Lisa Jack & Sally-Ann Krzyzaniak, 2022. "Mapping Product Returns Processes in Multichannel Retailing: Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Zhang, Yufei & Voorhees, Clay M. & Lin, Chen & Chiang, Jeongwen & Hult, G.Tomas M. & Calantone, Roger J., 2022. "Information Search and Product Returns Across Mobile and Traditional Online Channels," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 260-276.
    5. Marco Melacini & Elena Tappia, 2018. "A Critical Comparison of Alternative Distribution Configurations in Omni-Channel Retailing in Terms of Cost and Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Vakulenko, Yulia & Shams, Poja & Hellström, Daniel & Hjort, Klas, 2019. "Service innovation in e-commerce last mile delivery: Mapping the e-customer journey," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 461-468.
    7. Margaret Sullivan Pepe, 2000. "An Interpretation for the ROC Curve and Inference Using GLM Procedures," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 352-359, June.
    8. Florio, Alexandre M. & Feillet, Dominique & Hartl, Richard F., 2018. "The delivery problem: Optimizing hit rates in e-commerce deliveries," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 455-472.
    9. Massimo Di Gangi & Antonio Polimeni & Orlando Marco Belcore, 2023. "Freight Distribution in Small Islands: Integration between Naval Services and Parcel Lockers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Tokar, Travis & Jensen, Robert & Williams, Brent D., 2021. "A guide to the seen costs and unseen benefits of e-commerce," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 323-332.
    11. Guojie Xie & Lijuan Huang & Chrysostomos Apostolidis & Zuqing Huang & Weiwei Cai & Guokai Li, 2021. "Assessing Consumer Preference for Overpackaging Solutions in E-Commerce," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Pham, Thi Song Hanh & Ahammad, Mohammad Faisal, 2017. "Antecedents and consequences of online customer satisfaction: A holistic process perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 332-342.
    13. Jennifer Johnson Jorgensen & Katelyn Sorensen, 2021. "Negative e-WOM Resulting from Political Posts on Social Media: A Case Study of a Small Retailer’s Struggle over Time," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-11, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anurag Mishra & Pankaj Dutta, 2026. "Sustainable reverse logistics in e-commerce: a comprehensive literature review with challenges and research opportunities," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 358(1), pages 275-329, March.
    2. Shaema Ali Abdullah Al-Olfi & Yanan Song & Yazeed Mohammed Al-Hajj, 2026. "The Impact of Sustainable Supply Chain Strategies on E-Commerce Consumer Purchasing Behavior: Considering the Moderating Effect of Big Data Analytics," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 17(1), pages 364-399, February.
    3. Biancolin, Marta & Rotaris, Lucia & Pernot, Delphine, 2025. "Willingness to pay for sustainable delivery: Evidence from young consumers in Italy and Norway," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anurag Mishra & Pankaj Dutta, 2026. "Sustainable reverse logistics in e-commerce: a comprehensive literature review with challenges and research opportunities," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 358(1), pages 275-329, March.
    2. David Karl, 2025. "Forecasting e-commerce consumer returns: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 1-56, September.
    3. Celal Teoman Metehan & Edin Güçlü Sözer & Mustafa Emre Civelek & Adnan Veysel Ertemel & Ibrahim Sani Mert, 2025. "Buyer Platform Experience (PLX) in Online Marketplaces: Scale Development, Validation, and the Salience of Variety, Competitive Pricing, Service Excellence, and Promotion," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, November.
    4. Bonomi, Valentina & Manerba, Daniele & Mansini, Renata & Zanotti, Roberto, 2025. "Optimizing Attended Home Delivery: Multiple recovery options and customer availability profiles to face synchronization failures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    5. repec:iim:iimawp:14638 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea, 2023. "A Brief History of Service Innovation: The evolution of past, present, and future of service innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    7. Holly Janes & Margaret S. Pepe, 2008. "Matching in Studies of Classification Accuracy: Implications for Analysis, Efficiency, and Assessment of Incremental Value," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 1-9, March.
    8. Al-Adwan, Ahmad Samed & Al-Debei, Mutaz M. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2022. "E-commerce in high uncertainty avoidance cultures: The driving forces of repurchase and word-of-mouth intentions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Ljubica Radovanović, 2024. "Assessing Strategies to Overcome Barriers for Drone Usage in Last-Mile Logistics: A Novel Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, January.
    10. Sisi Wu & Xuan Gong & Yunfei Wang & Jian Cao, 2022. "Consumer Cognition and Management Perspective on Express Packaging Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Ziyi Li & Yijian Huang & Dattatraya Patil & Martin G. Sanda, 2023. "Covariate adjustment in continuous biomarker assessment," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 39-48, March.
    12. Justina Sidlauskiene & Yannick Joye & Vilte Auruskeviciene, 2023. "AI-based chatbots in conversational commerce and their effects on product and price perceptions," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Kokkinou, Alinda & Quak, Hans & Mitas, Ondrej & Mandemakers, Albert, 2024. "Should I wait or should I go? Encouraging customers to make the more sustainable delivery choice," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    14. Vijoleta Vrhovac & Stana Vasić & Stevan Milisavljević & Branislav Dudić & Peter Štarchoň & Marina Žižakov, 2023. "Measuring E-Commerce User Experience in the Last-Mile Delivery," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    15. Magdalena Mucowska, 2021. "Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    16. Dumez, Dorian & Lehuédé, Fabien & Péton, Olivier, 2021. "A large neighborhood search approach to the vehicle routing problem with delivery options," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 103-132.
    17. Brand, Benedikt M., 2025. "Bridging the intention-behavior-gap through digitalized information (?) - Two laboratory experiments in the textile industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    18. Krishna Teja Perannagari & Shivaani Kannan & B. Mythiri, 2025. "Navigating the Indian Fashion E-Commerce Landscape: Challenges and Opportunities for Emerging Start-Ups," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 10-22, June.
    19. Roman Domanski & Lukasz Hadas & Hubert Wojciechowski, 2021. "Consumer Preferences for Omnichannel Customer Service in the Consumer Electronics Industry," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 552-561.
    20. Vyt, Dany & Jara, Magali & Mevel, Olivier & Morvan, Thierry & Morvan, Nélida, 2022. "The impact of convenience in a click and collect retail setting: A consumer-based approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    21. Holly Janes & Gary Longton & Margaret S. Pepe, 2009. "Accommodating covariates in receiver operating characteristic analysis," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 9(1), pages 17-39, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12161-:d:1213436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.