IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10699-d1188677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Customer Predictive Ability on Sustainable Innovation in Customized Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Huayan Shen

    (School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
    School of Economics and Management, Guangzhou City Construction College, Guangzhou 510925, China)

  • Zhiyong Ou

    (School of Economics and Management, Guangzhou City Construction College, Guangzhou 510925, China)

  • Kexin Bi

    (School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China)

  • Yu Gao

    (School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China)

Abstract

Customer-centric service innovation performance has become a common businesses goal to pursue, particularly for service-oriented manufacturing companies. However, the continuous focus on the impact of enterprise resources and capabilities in service innovation fails to truly consider market orientation and customer capabilities as core influencing factors of service innovation performance at an individual level. This article explores new service behaviors driven by market orientation and customer predictive abilities, revealing the process of customer-driven value creation for sustainable innovation within enterprises. Ships are typical representatives of customized enterprises. This study examines the role of customer predictive capabilities in the sustainable innovation of shipbuilding companies, starting from a 20-year historical analysis of the global shipping and shipbuilding markets. By exploring the market orientation characteristics of the shipbuilding and shipping markets, this study investigates the behavioral impact of customer predictive abilities on sustainable innovation within shipbuilding enterprises. Employing time series and panel data in machine learning algorithms, specifically the random forest model, reveals a strong and statistically significant correlation between new ship deliveries and the Baltic dry index (BDI), with larger value ships having a more pronounced impact on the consumer market. The correlation analysis confirms that these two variables, in combination, can comprehensively reflect customer predictive ability and serve as crucial decision criteria for customer investment in new ship production. Furthermore, based on the principal component analysis of customer predictive ability and ship innovation levels Granger causality tests, this study demonstrates that customer predictive ability is a Granger cause of sustainable innovation in customized production. Customer predictive ability influences sustainable innovation in customized enterprises to varying degrees. This research provides valuable insights for shipbuilding companies regarding engaging in sustainable innovation in international markets and understanding the value of international market customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Huayan Shen & Zhiyong Ou & Kexin Bi & Yu Gao, 2023. "Impact of Customer Predictive Ability on Sustainable Innovation in Customized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10699-:d:1188677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10699/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10699/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greta Hsu & Balázs Kovács & Özgecan Koçak, 2019. "Experientially diverse customers and organizational adaptation in changing demand landscapes: A study of US cannabis markets, 2014–2016," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(13), pages 2214-2241, December.
    2. Eric von Hippel, 1986. "Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(7), pages 791-805, July.
    3. Jiling Li & Zekai Lin & Xiaheng Zhang, 2023. "The Study on the Effectiveness of Sustainable Customer Relationship Management: Evidence from the Online Shopping Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Philipp Schautschick & Christine Greenhalgh, 2016. "Empirical studies of trade marks -- The existing economic literature," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 358-390, June.
    5. Chae, Bongsug (Kevin), 2012. "An evolutionary framework for service innovation: Insights of complexity theory for service science," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 813-822.
    6. Thorsten Blecker & Nizar Abdelkafi, 2006. "Mass Customization: State-of-the-Art and Challenges," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Thorsten Blecker & Gerhard Friedrich (ed.), Mass Customization: Challenges and Solutions, chapter 0, pages 1-25, Springer.
    7. Fathi Mohamed Daradkeh & Thowayeb H. Hassan & Tatiana Palei & Mohamed Y. Helal & Sanaa Mabrouk & Mahmoud I. Saleh & Amany E. Salem & Nabila N. Elshawarbi, 2023. "Enhancing Digital Presence for Maximizing Customer Value in Fast-Food Restaurants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Byunghoon Kim & Gianluca Gazzola & Jaekyung Yang & Jae-Min Lee & Byoung-Youl Coh & Myong K. Jeong & Young-Seon Jeong, 2017. "Two-phase edge outlier detection method for technology opportunity discovery," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 1-16, October.
    9. de Haan, Evert & Verhoef, Peter C. & Wiesel, Thorsten, 2015. "The predictive ability of different customer feedback metrics for retention," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 195-206.
    10. Glen L. Urban & Eric von Hippel, 1988. "Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 569-582, May.
    11. Yoon-Jung Jang & Eojina Kim, 2023. "Social and Personal Norms in Shaping Customers’ Environmentally Sustainable Behavior in Restaurants’ Social Media Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    12. Gary L. Lilien & Pamela D. Morrison & Kathleen Searls & Mary Sonnack & Eric von Hippel, 2002. "Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea-Generation Process for New Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(8), pages 1042-1059, August.
    13. E. Rémy & S. Kopel, 2002. "Social Linking and Human Resources Management in the Service Sector," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 35-56, January.
    14. Witell, Lars & Snyder, Hannah & Gustafsson, Anders & Fombelle, Paul & Kristensson, Per, 2016. "Defining service innovation: A review and synthesis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2863-2872.
    15. Anna S. Cui & Fang Wu, 2016. "Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 516-538, July.
    16. MacCarthy, Bart & Brabazon, Philip G. & Bramham, Johanna, 2003. "Fundamental modes of operation for mass customization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 289-304, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, Pia & Nätti, Satu & Pikkarainen, Minna, 2021. "Orchestrating for lead user involvement in innovation networks," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Franke, Nikolaus & von Hippel, Eric & Schreier, Martin, 2005. "Finding commercially attractive user innovations: A test of lead user theory," Working papers 4536-05, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    3. Maxim Kotsemir & Alexander Abroskin & Dirk Meissner, 2013. "Innovation concepts and typology – an evolutionary discussion," HSE Working papers WP BRP 05/STI/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    4. Nicolai J. Foss & Keld Laursen & Torben Pedersen, 2011. "Linking Customer Interaction and Innovation: The Mediating Role of New Organizational Practices," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 980-999, August.
    5. Alexander Brem & Volker Bilgram & Adele Gutstein, 2021. "Involving Lead Users in Innovation: A Structured Summary of Research on the Lead User Method," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Alexander Brem (ed.), Emerging Issues and Trends in INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, chapter 2, pages 21-48, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Furrer, Olivier & Sudharshan, Devanathan & Tsiotsou, Rodoula H. & Liu, Ben S., 2016. "A framework for innovative service design," FSES Working Papers 476, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Freiburg/Fribourg Switzerland.
    7. Schweisfurth, Tim G. & Dharmawan, Magha P., 2019. "Does lead userness foster idea implementation and diffusion? A study of internal shopfloor users," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 289-297.
    8. Wu, Chia-huei & de Jong, Jeroen P.J. & Raasch, Christina & Poldervaart, Sabrine, 2020. "Work process-related lead userness as an antecedent of innovative behavior and user innovation in organizations," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 228657, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    9. Hua Liang & Zongyi Zhang, 2012. "The effects of industry characteristics on the sources of technological product and process innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 37(6), pages 867-884, December.
    10. Lettl, Christoph & Herstatt, Cornelius & Gemuenden, H-G., 2004. "Learning from users for radical innovation," Working Papers 27, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    11. Wu, Chia-huei & de Jong, Jeroen P.J. & Raasch, Christina & Poldervaart, Sabrine, 2020. "Work process-related lead userness as an antecedent of innovative behavior and user innovation in organizations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(6).
    12. Aaron K. Chatterji & Kira Fabrizio, 2012. "How Do Product Users Influence Corporate Invention?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 971-987, August.
    13. Lettl, Christopher & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2004. "Users as inventors and developers of radical innovation: An explorative case study analysis in the field of medical technology," Working Papers 22, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    14. Oliveira, Pedro & von Hippel, Eric, 2011. "Users as service innovators: The case of banking services," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 806-818, July.
    15. Preißner, Stephanie & Raasch, Christina & Schweisfurth, Tim, 2017. "Is necessity the mother of disruption?," Kiel Working Papers 2097, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    16. Schweisfurth, Tim G., 2017. "Comparing internal and external lead users as sources of innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 238-248.
    17. Skiba, Florian & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2008. "Integration of innovative users as source of service innovations," Working Papers 54, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    18. Francesco Paolo Appio & Antonella Martini & Silvia Massa & Stefania Testa, 2016. "Unveiling the intellectual origins of Social Media-based innovation: insights from a bibliometric approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(1), pages 355-388, July.
    19. Globocnik, Dietfried & Faullant, Rita, 2021. "Do lead users cooperate with manufacturers in innovation? Investigating the missing link between lead userness and cooperation initiation with manufacturers," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    20. Olmedilla, M. & Send, H. & Toral, S.L., 2019. "Identification of the unique attributes and topics within Smart Things Open Innovation Communities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 133-147.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10699-:d:1188677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.