IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p782-d1021932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers, Challenges, and Requirements for ICT Usage among Sub-Assistant Agricultural Officers in Bangladesh: Toward Sustainability in Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Mamiya Binte Ahsan

    (Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Guo Leifeng

    (Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Fardous Mohammad Safiul Azam

    (Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Beibei Xu

    (Biological System Engineering, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA)

  • Shah Johir Rayhan

    (Department of Management and Finance, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural Sciences, Sher-e Bangla Nagar, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh)

  • Abdul Kaium

    (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Sher-e Bangla Nagar, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh)

  • Wang Wensheng

    (Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

The present work is the first detailed study of sub-assistant agricultural officers (SAAOs), who are key players in delivering agriculture extension services in Bangladesh. We determined the status of information and communication technology (ICT) usage, knowledge gaps, approaches and tools for information delivery, barriers and obstacles to ICT usage, requirements for adoption, and possible solutions for efficient agriculture extension advisory services. We surveyed key respondents (SAAOs, n = 117) from nine sub-districts under the six administrative districts of Bangladesh with a semi-structured questionnaire. We found that 73.2% of all extension officers had basic knowledge of ICT. We observed that the most effective tool for information dissemination was field visits (90.90%, Moulvibazar district) and the most frequent extension approach was training and workshops (77.31%, Dhaka district). The best sources for information collection were broadcast media and social media. While delivering information, difficulty was found due to technical obstacles in Gazipur district, Rajshahi district, Sylhet district, and Dhaka district among 60% to 70% of SAAOs. However, farmers’ ignorance was reported in both Feni district and Moulvibazar district (36.36%). A shortage of computers in Gazipur district (56.25%) was an essential barrier to ICT usage for extension services. A major challenge in using ICT applications in Dhaka district was inadequate training support (64.51%). Mobile devices, internet connectivity, updated ICT applications, and a farmers’ database were the most important supports needed for the SAAO’s skilled advisory activities. In conclusion, our results and recommendations will help to redesign policies to improve infrastructure and allocate funding for capacity and skill development and ICT-based innovations in this sector to achieve sustainable extension and advisory services and attain food security in Bangladesh.

Suggested Citation

  • Mamiya Binte Ahsan & Guo Leifeng & Fardous Mohammad Safiul Azam & Beibei Xu & Shah Johir Rayhan & Abdul Kaium & Wang Wensheng, 2022. "Barriers, Challenges, and Requirements for ICT Usage among Sub-Assistant Agricultural Officers in Bangladesh: Toward Sustainability in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:782-:d:1021932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/782/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/782/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Birkhaeuser, Dean & Evenson, Robert E & Feder, Gershon, 1991. "The Economic Impact of Agricultural Extension: A Review," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(3), pages 607-650, April.
    2. Aryal, Jeetendra Prakash & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Maharjan, Sofina & Erenstein, Olaf, 2019. "Understanding factors associated with agricultural mechanization: A Bangladesh case," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 1-9.
    3. Shana R. Ponelis & Marlene A. Holmner, 2015. "ICT in Africa: Building a Better Life for All," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 163-177, April.
    4. Amemiya, Takeshi, 1981. "Qualitative Response Models: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 1483-1536, December.
    5. Alvi, Muzna & Barooah, Prapti & Gupta, Shweta & Saini, Smriti, 2021. "Women's access to agriculture extension amidst COVID-19: Insights from Gujarat, India and Dang, Nepal," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555.
    7. Baozhi Li & Ni Zhuo & Chen Ji & Qibiao Zhu, 2022. "Influence of Smartphone-Based Digital Extension Service on Farmers’ Sustainable Agricultural Technology Adoption in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Boubaker Dhehibi & Udo Rudiger & Hloniphani Peter Moyo & Mohamed Zied Dhraief, 2020. "Agricultural Technology Transfer Preferences of Smallholder Farmers in Tunisia’s Arid Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Juan Carlos Laso Bayas & Andrea Gardeazabal & Mathias Karner & Christian Folberth & Luis Vargas & Rastislav Skalský & Juraj Balkovič & Anto Subash & Moemen Saad & Sylvain Delerce & Jesús Crespo Cuares, 2020. "AgroTutor: A Mobile Phone Application Supporting Sustainable Agricultural Intensification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-10, November.
    10. Eastwood, C.R. & Chapman, D.F. & Paine, M.S., 2012. "Networks of practice for co-construction of agricultural decision support systems: Case studies of precision dairy farms in Australia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 10-18.
    11. Martey, Edward & Etwire, Prince M. & Kuwornu, John K.M., 2020. "Economic impacts of smallholder farmers’ adoption of drought-tolerant maize varieties," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    12. Narcyz Roztocki & Piotr Soja & Heinz Roland Weistroffer, 2019. "The role of information and communication technologies in socioeconomic development: towards a multi-dimensional framework," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 171-183, April.
    13. Abdul Quddus & Jaclyn D. Kropp, 2020. "Constraints to Agricultural Production and Marketing in the Lagging Regions of Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, May.
    14. Pil Sun Heo & Duk Hee Lee, 2019. "Evolution of the linkage structure of ICT industry and its role in the economic system: the case of Korea," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 424-454, July.
    15. Uzun, Vasily & Shagaida, Natalya & Lerman, Zvi, 2019. "Russian agriculture: Growth and institutional challenges," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 475-487.
    16. Prodham, F.A. & Afrad, M.S.I., 2014. "Knowledge And Perception Of Extension Workers Towards Ict Utilization In Agricultural Extension Service Delivery In Gazipur District Of Bangladesh," International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology (IJARIT), IJARIT Research Foundation, vol. 4(2), December.
    17. George W. Norton & Jeffrey Alwang, 2020. "Changes in Agricultural Extension and Implications for Farmer Adoption of New Practices," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(1), pages 8-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Assan Ng’ombe & Mupangi Sithole & Collins Muimi Musafiri & Milka Kiboi & Tomas Sales & Felix Ngetich, 2023. "Building a Resilient and Sustainable Sorghum Value Chain in Tanzania’s Lake Zone Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Laura Restrepo Campuzano & Gustavo Adolfo Hincapié Llanos & Jhon Wilder Zartha Sossa & Gina Lía Orozco Mendoza & Juan Carlos Palacio & Mariana Herrera, 2023. "Barriers to the Adoption of Innovations for Sustainable Development in the Agricultural Sector—Systematic Literature Review (SLR)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paleti, Rajesh, 2018. "Generalized multinomial probit Model: Accommodating constrained random parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 248-262.
    2. Erik Stam & Roy Thurik & Peter van der Zwan, 2010. "Entrepreneurial exit in real and imagined markets," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 19(4), pages 1109-1139, August.
    3. Haoying Wang & Guohui Wu, 2022. "Modeling discrete choices with large fine-scale spatial data: opportunities and challenges," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 325-351, July.
    4. Bergtold, Jason S. & Ramsey, Steven M., 2015. "Neural Network Estimators of Binary Choice Processes: Estimation, Marginal Effects and WTP," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205649, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Hess, Wolfgang & Persson, Maria, 2010. "The Duration of Trade Revisited. Continuous-Time vs. Discrete-Time Hazards," Working Papers 2010:1, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    6. Martin Kukuk & Michael Rönnberg, 2013. "Corporate credit default models: a mixed logit approach," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 467-483, April.
    7. Doris Läpple, 2023. "Information about Climate Change Mitigation: What Do Farmers Think?," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 22(1), pages 74-80, April.
    8. Milda Maria Burzala, 2012. "The Probability of Recession in Poland Based on the Hamilton Switching Model and the Logit Model," Dynamic Econometric Models, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 12, pages 73-88.
    9. Iryna Y. Johnson, 2019. "Destinations of Admitted Out-of-State Students: A Case of One Institution," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 60(3), pages 315-337, May.
    10. Steven M. Ramsey & Jason S. Bergtold, 2021. "Examining Inferences from Neural Network Estimators of Binary Choice Processes: Marginal Effects, and Willingness-to-Pay," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 58(4), pages 1137-1165, December.
    11. A. Colin Cameron, 2006. "Categorical Data," Working Papers 187, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    12. Jiabin Xu & Zhaoda Cui & Tianyi Wang & Jingjing Wang & Zhigang Yu & Cuixia Li, 2023. "Influence of Agricultural Technology Extension and Social Networks on Chinese Farmers’ Adoption of Conservation Tillage Technology," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, June.
    13. Jorge González Chapela, 2022. "Is there a patience premium on migration?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 2025-2055, October.
    14. Läpple, Doris & Rensburg, Tom Van, 2011. "Adoption of organic farming: Are there differences between early and late adoption?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(7), pages 1406-1414, May.
    15. William H. Greene & David A. Hensher, 2008. "Modeling Ordered Choices: A Primer and Recent Developments," Working Papers 08-26, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    16. Wolfgang Hess & Maria Persson, 2012. "The duration of trade revisited," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 1083-1107, December.
    17. Simon Cheng & J. Scott Long, 2007. "Testing for IIA in the Multinomial Logit Model," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 35(4), pages 583-600, May.
    18. Andrew S. Fullerton, 2009. "A Conceptual Framework for Ordered Logistic Regression Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 38(2), pages 306-347, November.
    19. Wuepper, David & Sauer, Johannes & Kleemann, Linda, 2014. "Sustainable intensification of pineapple farming in Ghana: Training and complexity," Kiel Working Papers 1973, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    20. R. S. Owoeye & A. B. Sekumade & Didunyemi Adekunle John & M. J. Falade, 2022. "Analysis Of Farmers’ Business School Participation On Cocoa Productivity In Ondo State, Nigeria," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 8(6), December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:782-:d:1021932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.