IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p50-d1009420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How the Internet Affects China’s Green Consumption Development: Empirical Research Based on Baidu Index Data

Author

Listed:
  • Jinyan Peng

    (Zhejiang Institute of Economics and Trade, College of Business Administration, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Kai Li

    (School of Economics, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276800, China)

  • Yingpeng Gao

    (School of Management, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276800, China)

Abstract

Green consumption falls short in China’s overall green economic and social transformation. There is a consensus to activate the potential of green consumption through the Internet. However, limited by the availability of green consumption data, few empirical studies focus on the impact of the Internet on green consumption. Based on the 2016–2020 Baidu Index of green consumption in 31 provinces and cities in China, this paper uses a fixed effect model with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors to assess the impact of the Internet on China’s green consumption development and its impact mechanism. The results showed that improved Internet access capability and the development of the e-government play a significant role in promoting green consumption. The former helps to reduce the cost of consumers’ information acquisition, while the latter helps to strengthen market supervision and improve the market environment. E-commerce has a significant negative impact on the development of green consumption, mainly because the existing e-commerce model is not conducive to the development of consumer trust. The impact of digital payment is not significant. Therefore, to achieve multi-governance and improve the Internet by activating green consumption, government departments need to promote the innovation of marketing models and strengthen the platform’s supervision.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinyan Peng & Kai Li & Yingpeng Gao, 2022. "How the Internet Affects China’s Green Consumption Development: Empirical Research Based on Baidu Index Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:50-:d:1009420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/50/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/50/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucas, Sterenn & Salladarré, Frédéric & Brécard, Dorothée, 2018. "Green consumption and peer effects: Does it work for seafood products?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 44-55.
    2. Schinkel, Maarten Pieter & Spiegel, Yossi, 2017. "Can collusion promote sustainable consumption and production?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 371-398.
    3. Minton, Elizabeth A. & Spielmann, Nathalie & Kahle, Lynn R. & Kim, Chung-Hyun, 2018. "The subjective norms of sustainable consumption: A cross-cultural exploration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 400-408.
    4. Emeline Bezin, 2019. "The economics of Green consumption, cultural transmission and sustainable technological change," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02087970, HAL.
    5. Binder, Martin & Blankenberg, Ann-Kathrin, 2017. "Green lifestyles and subjective well-being: More about self-image than actual behavior?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 304-323.
    6. Marie Diekmann & Ludwig Theuvsen, 2019. "Value structures determining community supported agriculture: insights from Germany," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(4), pages 733-746, December.
    7. Nathalie Lazaric & Pasquale Tridico & Sebastiano Fadda, 2020. "Governing structural changes and sustainability through (new) institutions and organizations," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1267-1273, November.
    8. Peter C. Verhoef, 2005. "Explaining purchases of organic meat by Dutch consumers," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 32(2), pages 245-267, June.
    9. Emeline Bezin, 2019. "The economics of Green consumption, cultural transmission and sustainable technological change," Post-Print halshs-02087970, HAL.
    10. Bezin, Emeline, 2019. "The economics of green consumption, cultural transmission and sustainable technological change," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 497-546.
    11. Andreas Chai, 2017. "Tackling Keynes’ question: a look back on 15 years of Learning To Consume," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 251-271, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han, Fei & Zhou, Jiehong & Yan, Zhen & Yin, Shijiu, 2022. "Nudge to be Green? The Influence of Social Comparison on Consumers' Consumption Behaviors: A Case Study of Green Takeaway Packaging," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322228, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Ambec, Stefan & De Donder, Philippe, 2022. "Environmental policy with green consumerism," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    3. Liwen Chen & Bobby Chung & Guanghua Wang, 2022. "Stay-at-Home Peer Mothers and Gender Norms: Short-run Effects on Educational Outcomes," Working Papers 2022-039, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    4. Bezin, Emeline & Ponthière, Gregory, 2019. "The tragedy of the commons and socialization: Theory and policy," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    5. Mattauch, Linus & Hepburn, Cameron & Spuler, Fiona & Stern, Nicholas, 2022. "The economics of climate change with endogenous preferences," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    6. Eugénie Joltreau, 2022. "Extended Producer Responsibility, Packaging Waste Reduction and Eco-design," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(3), pages 527-578, November.
    7. Fabio Zagonari, 2020. "Environmental sustainability is not worth pursuing unless it is achieved for ethical reasons," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, December.
    8. Liwen Chen & Bobby W. Chung & Guanghua Wang, 2023. "Stay-at-Home Peer Mothers and Gender Norms: Short-run Effects on Educational Outcomes," Working Papers 2023-03, University of South Florida, Department of Economics.
    9. Mohd Yusoff Yusliza & Amirudin Amirudin & Raden Aswin Rahadi & Nik Afzan Nik Sarah Athirah & Thurasamy Ramayah & Zikri Muhammad & Francesca Dal Mas & Maurizio Massaro & Jumadil Saputra & Safiek Mokhli, 2020. "An Investigation of Pro-Environmental Behaviour and Sustainable Development in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Jessica Aschemann-Witzel & Stephan Zielke, 2017. "Can't Buy Me Green? A Review of Consumer Perceptions of and Behavior Toward the Price of Organic Food," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 211-251, March.
    11. Philip R. Walsh & Rachel Dodds & Julianna Priskin & Jonathon Day & Oxana Belozerova, 2021. "The Corporate Responsibility Paradox: A Multi-National Investigation of Business Traveller Attitudes and Their Sustainable Travel Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Lang, Le Dang & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Hieu, Hoang Ngoc & Ha, Nguyen Minh & Gaur, Jighyasu, 2023. "The role of structural social capital in driving social-oriented sustainable agricultural entrepreneurship," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    13. Iljana Schubert & Judith I. M. de Groot & Adrian C. Newton, 2021. "Challenging the Status Quo through Social Influence: Changes in Sustainable Consumption through the Influence of Social Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Leonhard K. Lades & Kate Laffan & Till O. Weber, 2020. "Do economic preferences predict pro-environmental behaviour?," Working Papers 202003, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    15. Yaliu Yang & Yuan Wang & Cui Wang & Yingyan Zhang & Cuixia Zhang, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Evolution of the Science and Technology Innovative Efficiency of Regional Industrial Enterprises: A Data-Driven Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Budzinski, Oliver & Stöhr, Annika, 2023. "Wettbewerb und Nachhaltigkeit in Deutschland und der EU: Ökonomische Einschätzung der Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 179, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    17. Roberto Amaral-Santos & Ariaster Chimeli & Joao Paulo Pessoa, 2023. "Natural Gas Vehicles: Consequences to Fuel Markets and the Environment," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2023_07, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    18. Xiangzhi Bu & Hoang Viet Nguyen & Tsung Piao Chou & Chia-Pin Chen, 2020. "A Comprehensive Model of Consumers’ Perceptions, Attitudes and Behavioral Intention toward Organic Tea: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Joshua Henkel, 2022. "Economics & Biology: The whole is something besides the parts – a complementary approach to a bioeconomy," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2210, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    20. John Foster, 2021. "The US consumption function: a new perspective," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 773-798, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:50-:d:1009420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.