IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9786-d883150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Financing and Financial Risk Management of Financial Institutions—Case Study on Chinese Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Liu

    (School of Finance and Trade, Wenzhou Business College, Wenzhou 325035, China)

  • Weilun Huang

    (School of Finance and Trade, Wenzhou Business College, Wenzhou 325035, China)

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between sustainable financing and financial risk management of Chinese financial institutions, using data from Chinese banks. Financial risk management is a comprehensive measure of operating performance, asset quality and capital adequacy ratio. The structural vector auto-regression model determines the relationship between two variables. The positive shock of sustainable financing business negatively impacts the financial risk management of banks. In contrast, positive shock of banks’ financial risk management positively affects sustainable financing. Further subdivision of the sample revealed that sustainable financing does not always negatively impact the financial risk management of large state-owned banks. However, the positive shock of financial risk management reduces urban banks’ green credit proportions. The results are consistent whenever compared between the empirical outcome of the entire sample and the sample consisting of national joint stock bank accounts. This comparison helps eliminate the possibility of a biased outcome as a major portion of the sample is from a national joint-stock bank account. Apart from data limitations, the results of the sub-sample test are influenced due to the difference in deposit and loan interest rates, as well as different ownership structures of banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Liu & Weilun Huang, 2022. "Sustainable Financing and Financial Risk Management of Financial Institutions—Case Study on Chinese Banks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9786-:d:883150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9786/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9786/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Campiglio, Emanuele, 2016. "Beyond carbon pricing: The role of banking and monetary policy in financing the transition to a low-carbon economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 220-230.
    2. Góes, Carlos, 2016. "Institutions and growth: A GMM/IV Panel VAR approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 85-91.
    3. Popp, Thies R. & Feindt, Peter H. & Daedlow, Katrin, 2021. "Policy feedback and lock-in effects of new agricultural policy instruments: A qualitative comparative analysis of support for financial risk management tools in OECD countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Huang, Zhehao & Liao, Gaoke & Li, Zhenghui, 2019. "Loaning scale and government subsidy for promoting green innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 148-156.
    5. Sergei G. Vagin & Elena I. Kostyukova & Natalia E. Spiridonova & Tatiana M. Vorozheykina, 2022. "Financial Risk Management Based on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Interests of Sustainable Development," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Ascui, Francisco & Ball, Alex & Kahn, Lewis & Rowe, James, 2021. "Is operationalising natural capital risk assessment practicable?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    7. Luc Laeven & FabiÁn Valencia, 2013. "The Real Effects of Financial Sector Interventions during Crises," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(1), pages 147-177, February.
    8. Rob Bauer & Tobias Ruof & Paul Smeets & Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh, 2021. "Get Real! Individuals Prefer More Sustainable Investments [Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: The case of hypothetical gap in contingent valuation]," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(8), pages 3976-4043.
    9. Juniati Gunawan & Paulina Permatasari & Umesh Sharma, 2022. "Exploring sustainability and green banking disclosures: a study of banking sector," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(9), pages 11153-11194, September.
    10. Yuan, Fei & Gallagher, Kevin P., 2018. "Greening Development Lending in the Americas: Trends and Determinants," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 189-200.
    11. József Varga & Gyöngyi Bánkuti & Rita Kovács-Szamosi, 2020. "Analysis of the Turkish Islamic Banking Sector Using CAMEL and Similarity Analysis Methods," Acta Oeconomica, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 70(2), pages 275-296, June.
    12. Alexey S. Kharlanov & Yuliya V. Bazhdanova & Teimuraz A. Kemkhashvili & Natalia G. Sapozhnikova, 2022. "The Case Experience of Integrating the SDGs into Corporate Strategies for Financial Risk Management Based on Social Responsibility (with the Example of Russian TNCs)," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Juan Camilo Mejia-Escobar & Juan David González-Ruiz & Eduardo Duque-Grisales, 2020. "Sustainable Financial Products in the Latin America Banking Industry: Current Status and Insights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-25, July.
    14. Wanke, Peter & Azad, Md. Abul Kalam & Barros, Carlos Pestana, 2016. "Financial distress and the Malaysian dual baking system: A dynamic slacks approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 1-18.
    15. Esmaeili, Parisa & Rafei, Meysam, 2021. "Dynamics analysis of factors affecting electricity consumption fluctuations based on economic conditions: Application of SVAR and TVP-VAR models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    16. Shuanglian Chen & Zhehao Huang & Benjamin M. Drakeford & Pierre Failler, 2019. "Lending Interest Rate, Loaning Scale, and Government Subsidy Scale in Green Innovation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, November.
    17. Aditya Pratama Nandiwardhana & Dan Cudjoe & Dudi Permana, 2022. "A sustainable development assessment of Indonesia’s state banks financing for the industrial and non-industrial sector," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 894-911, July.
    18. Giovanni Catello Landi & Francesca Iandolo & Antonio Renzi & Andrea Rey, 2022. "Embedding sustainability in risk management: The impact of environmental, social, and governance ratings on corporate financial risk," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 1096-1107, July.
    19. Bert Scholtens, 2006. "Finance as a Driver of Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 19-33, September.
    20. Francisco Climent & Pilar Soriano, 2011. "Green and Good? The Investment Performance of US Environmental Mutual Funds," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(2), pages 275-287, October.
    21. Ari, Ibrahim & Koc, Muammer, 2021. "Philanthropic-crowdfunding-partnership: A proof-of-concept study for sustainable financing in low-carbon energy transitions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    22. Miriam Kennet & Volker Heinemann, 2006. "Green Economics: setting the scene. Aims, context, and philosophical underpinning of the distinctive new solutions offered by Green Economics," International Journal of Green Economics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1/2), pages 68-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pejman Peykani & Mostafa Sargolzaei & Mohammad Hashem Botshekan & Camelia Oprean-Stan & Amir Takaloo, 2023. "Optimization of Asset and Liability Management of Banks with Minimum Possible Changes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao Yan Zhou & Ben Caldecott & Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Yao Wang, 2022. "Bank green lending and credit risk: an empirical analysis of China's Green Credit Policy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1623-1640, May.
    2. Roy Kouwenberg & Chenglong Zheng, 2023. "A Review of the Global Climate Finance Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-32, January.
    3. Jing Sun & Ningning Zhai & Jichao Miao & Huaping Sun, 2022. "Can Green Finance Effectively Promote the Carbon Emission Reduction in “Local-Neighborhood” Areas?—Empirical Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Wang, Moran & Li, Xuerong & Wang, Shouyang, 2021. "Discovering research trends and opportunities of green finance and energy policy: A data-driven scientometric analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. Xi, Xun & Xi, Baoxing & Miao, Chenglin & Yu, Rongjian & Xie, Jie & Xiang, Rong & Hu, Feng, 2022. "Factors influencing technological innovation efficiency in the Chinese video game industry: Applying the meta-frontier approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    6. Qi, Xiulin & Wu, Zhifang & Xu, Jinqing & Shan, Biaoan, 2023. "Environmental justice and green innovation: A quasi-natural experiment based on the establishment of environmental courts in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. He, Feng & Yan, Yulin & Hao, Jing & Wu, Ji (George), 2022. "Retail investor attention and corporate green innovation: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    8. Patricia Crifo & Vanina Forget, 2013. "Think Global, Invest Responsible: Why the Private Equity Industry Goes Green," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 21-48, August.
    9. Chen, Yang & Cheng, Liang & Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Chang-song, 2021. "The impact of regional banks on environmental pollution: Evidence from China's city commercial banks," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Ran Zhang & Guoquan Kong & Huaping Sun, 2023. "Can New-Type Urbanization Promote Enterprise Green Technology Innovation?—A Study Based on Difference-in-Differences Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Fei Tang, 2021. "Busting the ‘Princeling’? Demystifying the Effect of Corporate Depoliticization on Green Innovation: The Moderating Effect of Politician Turnover," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Debao Dai & Yaodong Fan & Guangyu Wang & Jiaping Xie, 2022. "Digital Economy, R&D Investment, and Regional Green Innovation—Analysis Based on Provincial Panel Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    13. Dezhong Duan & Qifan Xia, 2021. "Does Environmental Regulation Promote Environmental Innovation? An Empirical Study of Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Chuanlin Wang & Guowan Yan & Juan Ou, 2023. "Does Digitization Promote Green Innovation? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-27, February.
    15. Xun Zhang & Biao Xu, 2019. "R&D Internationalization and Green Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Resource Enterprises and Environmental Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Yue Liu & Pierre Failler & Liming Chen, 2021. "Can Mandatory Disclosure Policies Promote Corporate Environmental Responsibility?—Quasi-Natural Experimental Research on China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Xiaohua Li & Lina Ma & Salahuddin Khan & Xin Zhao, 2023. "The Role of Education and Green Innovation in Green Transition: Advancing the United Nations Agenda on Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Fang, Zhenming & Kong, Xiaoran & Sensoy, Ahmet & Cui, Xin & Cheng, Feiyang, 2021. "Government’s awareness of Environmental protection and corporate green innovation: A natural experiment from the new environmental protection law in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 294-312.
    19. Lingli Qing & Dongphil Chun & Abd Alwahed Dagestani & Peng Li, 2022. "Does Proactive Green Technology Innovation Improve Financial Performance? Evidence from Listed Companies with Semiconductor Concepts Stock in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    20. Qihang Xue & Caiquan Bai & Weiwei Xiao, 2022. "Fintech and corporate green technology innovation: Impacts and mechanisms," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3898-3914, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9786-:d:883150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.