IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i2p917-d482214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Society 5.0 and Industry 4.0 Ideas Shape the Open Data Performance Expectancy

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz

    (Department of Informatics, College of Informatics and Communication, University of Economics in Katowice, 1 Maja Str. 50, 40-287 Katowice, Poland)

  • Iwona Zdonek

    (Department of Organization and Management, Institute of Economy and Informatics, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka Str. 2A, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

Abstract

The open data (OD) performance expectancy is a critical factor for the user technology acceptance models for future implementation OD in Industry 4.0, and to have an impact in area of Society 5.0. The purpose of this article is identifying trends and key words (leading terms) in promoting ODs for their use in Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0. We are also looking for leaders in Europe in promoting the use of OD in the context of Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0. The research methodology includes methods such as: analyses based on text mining, visualization techniques, and multidimensional cluster analyses with correlation analyses. The dataset covered 288 digital products and services based on OD. The timeframe covers the period January 2018–January 2020, and the research focuses on European issues. The research is focused on texts promoting the digital OD products and services, with the most popular being applications, websites and platforms. The main direction in presenting the benefits of their use is related to promoting them as tools to provide real time information on public issues, primarily in areas such as transport, education, culture and sport, economics and finance and health. The main types of OD are geodata and those specified as national and local. Additionally, the geographical area in Europe-dominating countries, and the key terms promoting product and services in context of OD performance expectancy in Western Europe, Northern Europe, Southern Europe and Eastern Europe, were found.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz & Iwona Zdonek, 2021. "How Society 5.0 and Industry 4.0 Ideas Shape the Open Data Performance Expectancy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:917-:d:482214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/917/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/917/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. Patrycja Szarek-Iwaniuk & Adam Senetra, 2020. "Access to ICT in Poland and the Co-Creation of Urban Space in the Process of Modern Social Participation in a Smart City—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Jarosław Wątróbski & Ewa Ziemba & Artur Karczmarczyk & Jarosław Jankowski, 2018. "An Index to Measure the Sustainable Information Society: The Polish Households Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-30, September.
    4. Esperanza Marcos & Valeria De Castro & María-Luz Martín-Peña & Juan Manuel Vara, 2020. "Training New Professionals in Service Engineering: Towards a Transdisciplinary Curriculum for Sustainable Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Deepti Mishra & Alok Mishra, 2020. "Sustainability Inclusion in Informatics Curriculum Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Barbara Aquilani & Michela Piccarozzi & Tindara Abbate & Anna Codini, 2020. "The Role of Open Innovation and Value Co-creation in the Challenging Transition from Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0: Toward a Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Tatyana Tolstykh & Nadezhda Shmeleva & Leyla Gamidullaeva, 2020. "Evaluation of Circular and Integration Potentials of Innovation Ecosystems for Industrial Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Maria Pafi & Christos Chalkias & Demetris Stathakis, 2020. "A cost-effective method for tranquility mapping using open environmental data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(3), pages 417-436, March.
    9. Rantala, Salla & Swallow, Brent & Paloniemi, Riikka & Raitanen, Elina, 2020. "Governance of forests and governance of forest information: Interlinkages in the age of open and digital data," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barbara Fura & Aneta Karasek & Beata Hysa, 2025. "Statistical assessment of digital transformation in European Union countries under sustainable development goal 9," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 937-972, February.
    2. Piccarozzi, Michela & Silvestri, Luca & Silvestri, Cecilia & Ruggieri, Alessandro, 2024. "Roadmap to Industry 5.0: Enabling technologies, challenges, and opportunities towards a holistic definition in management studies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    3. Hanlie Smuts & Alta Van der Merwe, 2022. "Knowledge Management in Society 5.0: A Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-27, June.
    4. Victor Gonzalez & Manuel Peralta & Juan Faxas-Guzmán & Yokasta García Frómeta, 2022. "Real-Time Environmental Monitoring Platform for Wellness and Preventive Care in a Smart and Sustainable City with an Urban Landscape Perspective: The Case of Developing Countries," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Patryk Morawiec & Anna Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz, 2022. "Cloud Computing, Big Data, and Blockchain Technology Adoption in ERP Implementation Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Markendahl, Jan, 2022. "Analysis of use of shared data for smart parking services in Sweden," 31st European Regional ITS Conference, Gothenburg 2022: Reining in Digital Platforms? Challenging monopolies, promoting competition and developing regulatory regimes 265655, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    7. Drago, Carlo & Leogrande, Angelo, 2024. "Beyond Temperature: How the Heat Index 35 Shapes Environmental, Social, and Governance Standards," MPRA Paper 122697, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patryk Morawiec & Anna Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz, 2023. "ERP System Development for Business Agility in Industry 4.0—A Literature Review Based on the TOE Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Tran Huy Phuong & Thanh Trung Hieu, 2015. "Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Undergraduate Students in Vietnam: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 46-55, August.
    4. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 0. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    5. Alsalem, Amani & Fry, Marie-Louise & Thaichon, Park, 2020. "To donate or to waste it: Understanding posthumous organ donation attitude," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 87-97.
    6. Mohammed Akhmaaj, Asmaeil Ali & Sharif, Mohamed Omar, 2024. "The effects of planned behavior model constructs and technology acceptance model constructs on online purchasing behavior: An empirical study on internet users in the Libya city of Tripoli," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Benoît Lécureux & Adrien Bonnet & Ouassim Manout & Jaâfar Berrada & Louafi Bouzouina, 2022. "Acceptance of Shared Autonomous Vehicles: A Literature Review of stated choice experiments," Working Papers hal-03814947, HAL.
    8. Kristin Thomas & Evalill Nilsson & Karin Festin & Pontus Henriksson & Mats Lowén & Marie Löf & Margareta Kristenson, 2020. "Associations of Psychosocial Factors with Multiple Health Behaviors: A Population-Based Study of Middle-Aged Men and Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Kamruzzaman, Md. & Baker, Douglas & Washington, Simon & Turrell, Gavin, 2013. "Residential dissonance and mode choice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 12-28.
    10. Ficko, Andrej & Boncina, Andrej, 2013. "Probabilistic typology of management decision making in private forest properties," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 34-43.
    11. Muhammad Shahid Qureshi & Saadat Saeed & Syed Waleed Mehmood Wasti, 2016. "Erratum to: The impact of various entrepreneurial interventions during the business plan competition on the entrepreneur identity aspirations of participants," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 6(1), pages 1-1, December.
    12. Julie Bayle-Cordier & Loïc Berger & Rayan Elatmani & Massimo Tavoni, 2023. "Breath, Love, Walk? The Impact of Mindfulness Interventions on Climate Policy Support and Environmental Attitudes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, July.
    13. Szu‐Szu Ho & Rosie Stenhouse & Aisha Holloway, 2020. "Understanding HIV‐positive drug users’ experiences of taking highly active antiretroviral treatment: Identity–Values–Conscious engagement model," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9-10), pages 1561-1575, May.
    14. Alexandre Cabagnols & Ali Maâlej & Pierre Mauchand & Olfa Kammoun, 2022. "The determinants of entrepreneurial intention of scientist PhD students: analytical vs emotional formation of the intention," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 4(4), pages 63-82, December.
    15. Diwanji, Vaibhav S. & Cortese, Juliann, 2020. "Contrasting user generated videos versus brand generated videos in ecommerce," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    16. Carlos Bazan, 2022. "Effect of the University’s Environment and Support System on Subjective Social Norms as Precursor of the Entrepreneurial Intention of Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    17. Nouman Khurram & Umair Saeed, 2015. "Factors Influencing the Intention of People to Use Islamic Banking: An Evidence from Lahore, Pakistan," International Journal of Economics and Empirical Research (IJEER), The Economics and Social Development Organization (TESDO), vol. 3(8), pages 411-418, August.
    18. Agneta Larsson & Mats Westerberg & Lena Karlqvist & Gunvor Gard, 2018. "Teamwork and Safety Climate in Homecare: A Mixed Method Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, November.
    19. Leonidas A. Zampetakis & Manolis Lerakis & Konstantinos Kafetsios & Vassilis S. Moustakis, 2016. "The moderating role of anticipated affective ambivalence in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 815-838, September.
    20. Shuleski Darko & Radu Ioan & Anton Cristian Ioan & Crina Veronica Cristea, 2017. "Digital Transformation Approach for Improving Public Services Using Cloud Computing Technology. Case Study Bucharest, Romania," MIC 2017: Managing the Global Economy; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Monastier di Treviso, Italy, 24–27 May 2017,, University of Primorska Press.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:917-:d:482214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.