IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p3714-d776475.html

Cloud Computing, Big Data, and Blockchain Technology Adoption in ERP Implementation Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Patryk Morawiec

    (Department of Informatics, Faculty of Informatics and Communication, University of Economics in Katowice, 40-287 Katowice, Poland)

  • Anna Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz

    (Department of Informatics, Faculty of Informatics and Communication, University of Economics in Katowice, 40-287 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to present the new factors of ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning system) implementation related to the usage of cloud-based and blockchain information technology and to discover potential possibilities of using cloud computing, big data, and blockchain technologies in the methodology of ERP implementation. The article covers the characteristics of the current implementation methodologies and also discusses how these technologies can be adopted in the implementation process. During the study, a literature review was carried out and survey-based interviews with project managers were performed. Previous studies examined in the literature review have some limitations. Most of them are focused on ERP performance in the cloud or measure success factors of ERP implementation. A research gap exists regarding the impact of technologies in the implementation process and the results of this process. The research shed some light on cloud computing and blockchain in ERP implementation. The conclusions are as follows: (1) Some methods of sustainable methods of ERP implementation with the use of cloud technologies, blockchain, and big data have been examined in research studies, but there is still a lack of publications with in-depth analyses of the impact of blockchain on ERP implementation success. (2) The practitioners recommended the new technologies based on cloud computing and big data in the process of ERP implementation, and more knowledge about blockchain would have a positive impact on the success of sustainable ERP implementation as well as on the willingness to adopt the new technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Patryk Morawiec & Anna Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz, 2022. "Cloud Computing, Big Data, and Blockchain Technology Adoption in ERP Implementation Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3714-:d:776475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3714/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3714/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & Foropon, Cyril & Godinho Filho, Moacir, 2018. "When titans meet – Can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 18-25.
    2. Szymon Zaleski & Rafał Michalski, 2021. "Success Factors in Sustainable Management of IT Service Projects: Exploratory Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, April.
    3. Catherine Catherine & Edi Abdurachman, 2018. "ERP System Adoption Analysis Using TOE Framework in Permata Hijau Group (PHG) Medan," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 14(3), pages 91-105, July.
    4. Shaio Yan Huang & An An Chiu & Po Chi Chao & Arniati Arniati, 2019. "Critical Success Factors in Implementing Enterprise Resource Planning Systems for Sustainable Corporations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-42, November.
    5. Byungchan Ahn & Hyunchul Ahn, 2020. "Factors Affecting Intention to Adopt Cloud-Based ERP from a Comprehensive Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-27, August.
    6. Anna Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz & Iwona Zdonek, 2021. "How Society 5.0 and Industry 4.0 Ideas Shape the Open Data Performance Expectancy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Oppong, Stephen A. & Yen, David C. & Merhout, Jeffrey W., 2005. "A new strategy for harnessing knowledge management in e-commerce," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 413-435.
    8. Jarosław Wątróbski & Ewa Ziemba & Artur Karczmarczyk & Jarosław Jankowski, 2018. "An Index to Measure the Sustainable Information Society: The Polish Households Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-30, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adeel Ahmed & Saleem Zubair Ahmad & Muhammad Waseem Iqbal & Sabah Arif, 2025. "Challenges in Adopting ERP in Public Sector of Pakistan," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(2), pages 999-1004.
    2. Amin Jan & Anas A. Salameh & Haseeb Ur Rahman & Mohanad M. Alasiri, 2024. "Can blockchain technologies enhance environmental sustainable development goals performance in manufacturing firms? Potential mediation of green supply chain management practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2004-2019, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asimina Kouriati & Christina Moulogianni & Georgios Kountios & Thomas Bournaris & Eleni Dimitriadou & George Papadavid, 2022. "Evaluation of Critical Success Factors for Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation Using Quantitative Methods in Agricultural Processing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Jing Ma & Huaichao Chen & Kai Wang & Yifan Ma, 2025. "Research on the Impact of Digital Transformation on Carbon Performance of Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, June.
    3. Jinshan Zhang & Man Liu, 2024. "How to Leverage Digital Sustainability Orientation to Promote Environmentally Sustainable Practices of Manufacturing Enterprises in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Houljakbe Houlteurbe Dagou & Asli Pelin Gurgun & Kerim Koc & Cenk Budayan, 2025. "The Future of Construction: Integrating Innovative Technologies for Smarter Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-29, May.
    5. Li, Ying & Dai, Jing & Cui, Li, 2020. "The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    6. Acharya, Abhilash & Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Pereira, Vijay & Singh, Poonam, 2018. "Big data, knowledge co-creation and decision making in fashion industry," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 90-101.
    7. Jamal El Baz & Anass Cherrafi & Abla Chaouni Benabdellah & Kamar Zekhnini & Jean Noel Beka Be Nguema & Ridha Derrouiche, 2023. "Environmental Supply Chain Risk Management for Industry 4.0: A Data Mining Framework and Research Agenda," Post-Print hal-04335003, HAL.
    8. Olumide Emmanuel Oluyisola & Fabio Sgarbossa & Jan Ola Strandhagen, 2020. "Smart Production Planning and Control: Concept, Use-Cases and Sustainability Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-29, May.
    9. Bai, Chunguang & Dallasega, Patrick & Orzes, Guido & Sarkis, Joseph, 2020. "Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    10. S. G. Yapa & G. D. N Perera & P. Jayasekara, 2025. "Employee Engagement in Smart Factories: Research Gaps and a Nomological Framework for the Sri Lankan Apparel Sector," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 4538-4549, September.
    11. César Martínez-Olvera & Jaime Mora-Vargas, 2019. "A Comprehensive Framework for the Analysis of Industry 4.0 Value Domains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, May.
    12. He, Yugang, 2026. "Reconfiguring Korea’s dual transition: Empirical insights on the role of industry 4.0 technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Tao, Zhibin & Chao, Jiaxiao, 2024. "Unlocking new opportunities in the industry 4.0 era, exploring the critical impact of digital technology on sustainable performance and the mediating role of GSCM practices," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    14. Asterios Stroumpoulis & Evangelia Kopanaki & George Karaganis, 2021. "Examining the Relationship between Information Systems, Sustainable SCM, and Competitive Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Agata Klaus-Rosińska & Joanna Iwko, 2021. "Stakeholder Management—One of the Clues of Sustainable Project Management—As an Underestimated Factor of Project Success in Small Construction Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-27, September.
    16. Markendahl, Jan, 2022. "Analysis of use of shared data for smart parking services in Sweden," 31st European Regional ITS Conference, Gothenburg 2022: Reining in Digital Platforms? Challenging monopolies, promoting competition and developing regulatory regimes 265655, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    17. Agnieszka Konys, 2019. "Towards Sustainable Entrepreneurship Holistic Construct," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-33, November.
    18. Giovanni Ávila-Flores & Judith Juárez-Mancilla & Gustavo Hinojosa-Arango & Plácido Cruz-Chávez & Juan Manuel López-Vivas & Oscar Arizpe-Covarrubias, 2020. "A Practical Index to Estimate Mangrove Conservation Status: The Forests from La Paz Bay, Mexico as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Silvia H. Bonilla & Helton R. O. Silva & Marcia Terra da Silva & Rodrigo Franco Gonçalves & José B. Sacomano, 2018. "Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Implications: A Scenario-Based Analysis of the Impacts and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    20. Caiado, Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão & Machado, Eduardo & Santos, Renan Silva & Thomé, Antonio Márcio Tavares & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe, 2024. "Sustainable I4.0 integration and transition to I5.0 in traditional and digital technological organisations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3714-:d:776475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.