IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6878-d831856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Management in Society 5.0: A Sustainability Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Hanlie Smuts

    (Department of Informatics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0083, South Africa
    Knowledge Management South Africa, 59 Woodlands Ave, Hurlingham Manor, Sandton 2196, South Africa)

  • Alta Van der Merwe

    (Department of Informatics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0083, South Africa)

Abstract

Organizations require the means to navigate Society 5.0. This is a knowledge-intensive society where a sustainable balance must be created for social good through a system that integrates cyberspace and physical space. With significant data, information and insight exchange based on knowledge in people and machines, organizations need to make sense of the notion that knowledge assets are the central structuring elements for sustainable development. By considering the key aspects of knowledge management (KM) in Society 5.0 as they relate to sustainable development, organizations may leverage their KM capability and learning agility to successfully address the unique requirements of the new society, environment and goals for sustainable development. In this research, automated content analysis was applied to identify key KM aspects using the Leximancer software. A total of 252 academic papers were analyzed, identifying 10 themes related to key KM concepts in Society 5.0 as they pertain to sustainability. The KM concepts identified were described and mapped to the sustainability triple bottom line. They comprised three primary and three intersecting dimensions, i.e., the environment (planet), society (people) and economic performance (profit) in the socio-economic, eco-efficiency and socio-environmental domains. The most significant themes included “knowledge”, “human”, “companies”, “information” and “system”. Secondary themes included “innovation”, “development”, “resources”, “social” and “change”.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanlie Smuts & Alta Van der Merwe, 2022. "Knowledge Management in Society 5.0: A Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6878-:d:831856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6878/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6878/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Izaskun Alvarez-Meaza & Naiara Pikatza-Gorrotxategi & Rosa Maria Rio-Belver, 2020. "Sustainable Business Model Based on Open Innovation: Case Study of Iberdrola," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Francisco Javier Carrillo, 2014. "What 'knowledge-based' stands for? A position paper," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(4), pages 402-421.
    3. Meir Russ, 2021. "Knowledge Management for Sustainable Development in the Era of Continuously Accelerating Technological Revolutions: A Framework and Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-32, March.
    4. George Maramba & Hanlie Smuts, 2020. "Guidelines for Selecting Appropriate Knowledge Management System Implementation Frameworks," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 16(4), pages 81-108, October.
    5. Dongwook Kim & Sungbum Kim, 2017. "Sustainable Supply Chain Based on News Articles and Sustainability Reports: Text Mining with Leximancer and DICTION," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-44, June.
    6. Paola Adinolfi & Fernando Giancotti, 2021. "Pedagogical Triage and Emergent Strategies: A Management Educational Program in Pandemic Times," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Ramona Diana LEON, 2015. "The Future Knowledge Worker: An Intercultural Perspective," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 3(4), pages 675-691, December.
    8. Alberto Melane-Lavado & Agustín Álvarez-Herranz, 2018. "Different Ways to Access Knowledge for Sustainability-Oriented Innovation. The Effect of Foreign Direct Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-30, November.
    9. Nisar, Tahir M. & Prabhakar, Guru & Strakova, Lubica, 2019. "Social media information benefits, knowledge management and smart organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 264-272.
    10. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    11. Corina Dufour & Anca Draghici & Alina Paraschiva, 2020. "The Impact of Knowledge Management on Intellectual Capital. A Research Approach Using Skandia Navigators," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Gabriela Prostean & Juan José Lavios Villahoz & Laura Brancu & Gyula Bakacsi (ed.), Innovation in Sustainable Management and Entrepreneurship, chapter 0, pages 431-444, Springer.
    12. Claudiu Tiberiu Albulescu & Serban Miclea & Matei Tamasila & Mihaela Vartolomei, 2020. "Financial Constraints and the Structure of the Firm’s Investment: An Application to the Scientific R&D Industry from the Largest EU Countries," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Gabriela Prostean & Juan José Lavios Villahoz & Laura Brancu & Gyula Bakacsi (ed.), Innovation in Sustainable Management and Entrepreneurship, chapter 0, pages 245-255, Springer.
    13. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    14. Loon, Mark, 2019. "Knowledge management practice system: Theorising from an international meta-standard," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 432-441.
    15. Peter M. Bednar & Christine Welch, 2020. "Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 281-298, April.
    16. Andreja Pucihar, 2020. "The digital transformation journey: content analysis of Electronic Markets articles and Bled eConference proceedings from 2012 to 2019," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 29-37, March.
    17. Biswas, Indranil & Raj, Alok & Srivastava, Samir K., 2018. "Supply chain channel coordination with triple bottom line approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 213-226.
    18. Depken, Diane & Zeman, Catherine, 2018. "Small business challenges and the triple bottom line, TBL: Needs assessment in a Midwest State, U.S.A," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 44-50.
    19. Wen Pan Fagerlin & Minoru Shimamoto & Ran Li, 2019. "Boundary Objects as a Learning Mechanism for Sustainable Development Goals—A Case Study of a Japanese Company in the Chemical Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-26, November.
    20. Georgiana Alina Teohari & Nicolae Aurelian Bibu & Laura Brancu, 2020. "Innovative Aspects in Managing Classic Professional Orchestras, as Multiple Stakeholder Organizations," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Gabriela Prostean & Juan José Lavios Villahoz & Laura Brancu & Gyula Bakacsi (ed.), Innovation in Sustainable Management and Entrepreneurship, chapter 0, pages 507-525, Springer.
    21. Astadi Pangarso & Astadi Pangarso & Endang Siti Astuti & Kusdi Raharjo & Tri Wulida Afrianty, 2020. "The impact of absorptive capacity and innovation ambidexterity on sustainable competitive advantage: the case of Indonesian higher education," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 2436-2455, March.
    22. Singh, Sanjay Kumar, 2019. "Territoriality, task performance, and workplace deviance: Empirical evidence on role of knowledge hiding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 10-19.
    23. Santoro, Gabriele & Vrontis, Demetris & Thrassou, Alkis & Dezi, Luca, 2018. "The Internet of Things: Building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 347-354.
    24. Anna Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz & Iwona Zdonek, 2021. "How Society 5.0 and Industry 4.0 Ideas Shape the Open Data Performance Expectancy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    25. Ettore Bolisani & Constantin Bratianu, 2018. "Emergent Knowledge Strategies," Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, Springer, number 978-3-319-60657-6, March.
    26. Matthew E. Gladden, 2019. "Who Will Be the Members of Society 5.0? Towards an Anthropology of Technologically Posthumanized Future Societies," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-39, May.
    27. Ettore Bolisani & Constantin Bratianu, 2018. "The Emergence of Knowledge Management," Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, in: Emergent Knowledge Strategies, chapter 2, pages 23-47, Springer.
    28. Paul Negirla & Sorin Nanu & Ioan Silea & Octavian Stefan, 2020. "Another Approach Regarding the Balance Between Natural and Manufactured Ecosystems," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Gabriela Prostean & Juan José Lavios Villahoz & Laura Brancu & Gyula Bakacsi (ed.), Innovation in Sustainable Management and Entrepreneurship, chapter 0, pages 171-181, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wanxin He & Jianhua Fu & Youxi Luo, 2023. "A Study of Well-Being-Based Eco-efficiency Based on Super-SBM and Tobit Regression Model: The Case of China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 289-317, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vasja Roblek & Oshane Thorpe & Mirjana Pejic Bach & Andrej Jerman & Maja Meško, 2020. "The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Sustainability Practices: A Comparative Automated Content Analysis Approach of Theory and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Vasja Roblek & Maja Meško & Mirjana Pejić Bach & Oshane Thorpe & Polona Šprajc, 2020. "The Interaction between Internet, Sustainable Development, and Emergence of Society 5.0," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    4. Pandey, Jatin & Gupta, Manish & Behl, Abhishek & Pereira, Vijay & Budhwar, Pawan & Varma, Arup & Hassan, Yusuf & Kukreja, Priyam, 2021. "Technology-enabled knowledge management for community healthcare workers: The effects of knowledge sharing and knowledge hiding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 787-799.
    5. Judita Peterlin & Maja Meško & Vlado Dimovski & Vasja Roblek, 2021. "Automated content analysis: The review of the big data systemic discourse in tourism and hospitality," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 377-385, May.
    6. Ibrahim Yitmen & Amjad Almusaed & Sepehr Alizadehsalehi, 2023. "Investigating the Causal Relationships among Enablers of the Construction 5.0 Paradigm: Integration of Operator 5.0 and Society 5.0 with Human-Centricity, Sustainability, and Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, June.
    7. Daniel Lovin & Monica Raducan & Alexandru Capatina & Nicoleta Cristache, 2021. "Sustainable Knowledge Transfer from Business Simulations to Working Environments: Correlational vs. Configurational Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Oliinyk Olena & Bilan Yuriy & Mishchuk Halyna, 2021. "Knowledge Management and Economic Growth: The Assessment of Links and Determinants of Regulation," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 29(3), pages 20-39, September.
    9. Doroteja Vidmar & Marjeta Marolt & Andreja Pucihar, 2021. "Information Technology for Business Sustainability: A Literature Review with Automated Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    10. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Thrassou, Alkis & Vrontis, Demetris, 2021. "Antecedents and consequences of knowledge hiding: The moderating role of knowledge hiders and knowledge seekers in organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 303-313.
    11. Dorin Maier & Andreea Maier & Ioan Așchilean & Livia Anastasiu & Ovidiu Gavriș, 2020. "The Relationship between Innovation and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Cai, Ya-Jun & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2020. "A United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals perspective for sustainable textile and apparel supply chain management," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Roksana Binte Rezwan & Yoshi Takahashi, 2021. "The Psychology behind Knowledge Hiding in an Organization," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-38, May.
    14. Mehdi Tajpour & Elahe Hosseini & Maliheh Mohammadi & Behrooz Bahman-Zangi, 2022. "The Effect of Knowledge Management on the Sustainability of Technology-Driven Businesses in Emerging Markets: The Mediating Role of Social Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    15. Aurora Martínez-Martínez & Juan-Gabriel Cegarra-Navarro & Manuel-Jesús Cobo & Tiphaine Valon, 2023. "Impacts and Implications for Advancing in Environmental Knowledge in Hospitality Industry in COVID Society: a Bibliometric Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 2026-2053, June.
    16. Vasja Roblek & Maja Meško & Iztok Podbregar, 2021. "Impact of Car Sharing on Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Moshood, Taofeeq D. & Nawanir, Gusman & Mahmud, Fatimah & Mohamad, Fazeeda & Ahmad, Mohd Hanafiah & AbdulGhani, Airin, 2022. "Why do consumers purchase biodegradable plastic? The impact of hedonics and environmental motivations on switching intention from synthetic to biodegradable plastic among the young consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    18. Farhanah Fitria MUSTARI & Achmad GHAZALI, 2022. "Exploring Tacit Knowledge Sharing Enhancer Factors in Non- Profit Organizations Paper," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(1), pages 67-78, February.
    19. Fałda Beata & Małkowska Maria Alicja, 2023. "Turquoise Management Model in Knowledge-Based Organisations," Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 51-64, March.
    20. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6878-:d:831856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.