IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p2154-d500972.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Knowledge Transfer from Business Simulations to Working Environments: Correlational vs. Configurational Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Lovin

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 800001 Galati, Romania)

  • Monica Raducan

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 800001 Galati, Romania)

  • Alexandru Capatina

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 800001 Galati, Romania)

  • Nicoleta Cristache

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 800001 Galati, Romania)

Abstract

Employing both a correlational and a configurational framework, this study proposes that engagement in business simulations, working environment culture, and acquired knowledge on business simulations are forerunners of sustainable knowledge transfer from business schools to organizations through business simulations training. Using a sample of 120 graduates from a Romanian business school, the results from configurational framework (based on regression analyses) reveal that knowledge transfer is explained by engagement in business simulations and working environment culture. However, findings highlight no correlation between acquired knowledge through business simulations and knowledge transfer. We have also employed fsQCA (fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis), which reveals that engagement in business simulations, working environment culture, and acquired knowledge on business simulations are adequate conditions for knowledge transfer. This study sheds light on a new research avenue of knowledge transfer from business schools to industry, less investigated by prior research.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Lovin & Monica Raducan & Alexandru Capatina & Nicoleta Cristache, 2021. "Sustainable Knowledge Transfer from Business Simulations to Working Environments: Correlational vs. Configurational Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2154-:d:500972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2154/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2154/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Loet Leydesdorff & Martin Meyer, 2003. "The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 58(2), pages 191-203, October.
    2. Alexandru Capatina & Gianita Bleoju & Elisa Rancati & Émilie Hoareau, 2018. "Tracking precursors of learning analytics over serious game team performance ranking," Post-Print hal-02011178, HAL.
    3. Leischnig, Alexander & Henneberg, Stephan C. & Thornton, Sabrina C., 2016. "Net versus combinatory effects of firm and industry antecedents of sales growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3576-3583.
    4. Tina C. Ambos & Kristiina Mäkelä & Julian Birkinshaw & Pablo D'Este, 2008. "When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(8), pages 1424-1447, December.
    5. Tim Rogmans & Wasseem Abaza, 2019. "The Impact of International Business Strategy Simulation Games on Student Engagement," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 50(3), pages 393-407, June.
    6. Tho, Nguyen Dinh & Trang, Nguyen Thi Mai, 2015. "Can knowledge be transferred from business schools to business organizations through in-service training students? SEM and fsQCA findings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1332-1340.
    7. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    8. Yves Levant & Michel Coulmont & Raluca Sandu, 2016. "Business simulation as an active learning activity for developing soft skills," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 368-395, July.
    9. Ettore Bolisani & Constantin Bratianu, 2018. "Emergent Knowledge Strategies," Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, Springer, number 978-3-319-60657-6, March.
    10. Johannes Meuer & Christian Rupietta, 2017. "A review of integrated QCA and statistical analyses," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 2063-2083, September.
    11. Viorel Lefter & Constantin Brătianu & Adriana Agapie & Simona Agoston & Ivona Orzea, 2011. "Intergenerational knowledge transfer in the academic environment of knowledge-based economy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(30), pages 392-403, June.
    12. Ettore Bolisani & Constantin Bratianu, 2018. "The Emergence of Knowledge Management," Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, in: Emergent Knowledge Strategies, chapter 2, pages 23-47, Springer.
    13. Berbegal-Mirabent, Jasmina & Lafuente, Esteban & Solé, Francesc, 2013. "The pursuit of knowledge transfer activities: An efficiency analysis of Spanish universities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2051-2059.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jarmila Lazíková & Ivan Takáč & Ľubica Rumanovská & Tomáš Michalička & Michal Palko, 2022. "Which Skills Are the Most Absent among University Graduates in the Labour Market? Evidence from Slovakia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Tina Beranič & Marjan Heričko, 2022. "The Impact of Serious Games in Economic and Business Education: A Case of ERP Business Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Lavinia-Andreea GRUIA & Alexandru ROJA & Nicolae BIBU & Marian NASTASE, 2021. "Education as the Main Entry Point in a Digitally Transformed Future of Work," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 155-167.
    4. Jingyuan Fu & Meng Sun & Minhong Wang, 2022. "Simulation-Assisted Learning about a Complex Economic System: Impact on Low- and High-Achieving Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Maria-Cristina STEFAN & Violeta-Andreea ANDREIANA & Irina Antoaneta TANASESCU & Georgiana STOICA, 2021. "Impact of Television Advertising on the Impulse to Purchase Over-the-Counter Medicine," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 149-154.
    6. Violeta-Andreea ANDREIANA & Georgiana STOICA & Dorin IANCU & Irina Antoaneta TANASESCU, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of Advertisements - Catena Pharmacy Vs. Sensiblu Pharmacy," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 168-173.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farhanah Fitria MUSTARI & Achmad GHAZALI, 2022. "Exploring Tacit Knowledge Sharing Enhancer Factors in Non- Profit Organizations Paper," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(1), pages 67-78, February.
    2. Esteban Lafuente & Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent, 2019. "Assessing the productivity of technology transfer offices: an analysis of the relevance of aspiration performance and portfolio complexity," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 778-801, June.
    3. Ion Popa & Simona Cătălina Ștefan, 2019. "Modeling the Pathways of Knowledge Management Towards Social and Economic Outcomes of Health Organizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Tran Huy Phuong, 2019. "How authentic leadership promotes individual knowledge sharing: viewing from the lens of COR theory," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 14(4), pages 386-401, December.
    5. Irene Martín-Rubio & Diego Andina, 2016. "University Knowledge Transfer Offices and Social Responsibility," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Alexander Leischnig & Anja Geigenmüller, 2020. "Examining alliance management capabilities in university-industry collaboration," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 9-30, February.
    7. Ulrich Lichtenthaler & Eckhard Lichtenthaler, 2009. "A Capability‐Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(8), pages 1315-1338, December.
    8. Oliinyk Olena & Bilan Yuriy & Mishchuk Halyna, 2021. "Knowledge Management and Economic Growth: The Assessment of Links and Determinants of Regulation," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 29(3), pages 20-39, September.
    9. Amara, Nabil & Halilem, Norrin & Traoré, Namatié, 2016. "Adding value to companies' value chain: Role of business schools scholars," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1661-1668.
    10. Lalicic, Lidija & Weismayer, Christian, 2021. "Consumers’ reasons and perceived value co-creation of using artificial intelligence-enabled travel service agents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 891-901.
    11. Yang Cai & Youming Song & Xia Xiao & Wendian Shi, 2020. "The Effect of Social Capital on Tacit Knowledge-Sharing Intention: The Mediating Role of Employee Vigor," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    12. Tho, Nguyen Dinh & Trang, Nguyen Thi Mai, 2015. "Can knowledge be transferred from business schools to business organizations through in-service training students? SEM and fsQCA findings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1332-1340.
    13. Bejinaru Ruxandra, 2017. "Knowledge strategies aiming to improve the intellectual capital of universities," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 500-523, September.
    14. Delio I. Castaneda & Sergio Cuellar, 2021. "Knowledge Sharing in Business Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Yuandi Wang & Jiashun Huang & Yantai Chen & Xiongfeng Pan & Jin Chen, 2013. "Have Chinese universities embraced their third mission? New insight from a business perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(2), pages 207-222, November.
    16. Constantin Bratianu & Dan Florin Stanescu & Rares Mocanu, 2021. "Exploring the Knowledge Management Impact on Business Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    17. Hanlie Smuts & Alta Van der Merwe, 2022. "Knowledge Management in Society 5.0: A Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-27, June.
    18. Aurora Martínez-Martínez & Juan-Gabriel Cegarra-Navarro & Manuel-Jesús Cobo & Tiphaine Valon, 2023. "Impacts and Implications for Advancing in Environmental Knowledge in Hospitality Industry in COVID Society: a Bibliometric Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 2026-2053, June.
    19. Moshood, Taofeeq D. & Nawanir, Gusman & Mahmud, Fatimah & Mohamad, Fazeeda & Ahmad, Mohd Hanafiah & AbdulGhani, Airin, 2022. "Why do consumers purchase biodegradable plastic? The impact of hedonics and environmental motivations on switching intention from synthetic to biodegradable plastic among the young consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    20. Fałda Beata & Małkowska Maria Alicja, 2023. "Turquoise Management Model in Knowledge-Based Organisations," Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 51-64, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2154-:d:500972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.