IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/manmar/v12y2017i3p500-523n10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge strategies aiming to improve the intellectual capital of universities

Author

Listed:
  • Bejinaru Ruxandra

    (Academy of Romanian Scientists, Bucharest, Romania, The University “Stefan cel Mare” of Suceava, Romania)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present a new construct of the intellectual capital structure, based on the multifield theory of knowledge and the concept of nonlinear integrators and to identify the knowledge strategies to enhance the intellectual capital of universities. The paper presents a new approach, based on metaphorical thinking and thermodynamics logic in structuring the intellectual capital, based on the multifield theory of knowledge into its basic building blocks. Considering the two levels of intellectual capital, the paper presents the main knowledge strategies to enhance the university intellectual capital. The basic building blocks of the intellectual capital are: rational, emotional, and spiritual intellectual capital. Each building block is based on the corresponding field of knowledge. There are two significant levels of intellectual capital: potential and operational. Analyzing the university intellectual capital by using this new approach is much more realistic than in the previous approaches. The new approach is based on a thermodynamics paradigm, which means we need to develop new ways of thinking, evaluating, and enhancing the intellectual capital. The paper presents an original approach, based on metaphorical thinking, by considering basic ideas from the energy realm and thermodynamics theory. Also, the paper presents a matrix of possible knowledge strategies to increase the intellectual capital of universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Bejinaru Ruxandra, 2017. "Knowledge strategies aiming to improve the intellectual capital of universities," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 500-523, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:12:y:2017:i:3:p:500-523:n:10
    DOI: 10.1515/mmcks-2017-0030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/mmcks-2017-0030
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/mmcks-2017-0030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mitsuru Kodama, 2011. "Knowledge Integration Dynamics:Developing Strategic Innovation Capability," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 7857, December.
    2. Shahrazad HADAD, 2017. "Knowledge Economy: Characteristics and Dimensions," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(2), pages 203-225, June.
    3. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    4. Lu, Wen-Min, 2012. "Intellectual capital and university performance in Taiwan," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 1081-1089.
    5. José Maria Viedma Marti & Maria Rosário Cabrita, 2012. "Entrepreneurial Excellence in the Knowledge Economy," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-02407-7, October.
    6. John Dumay & Cristiana Bernardi & James Guthrie & Paola Demartini, 2016. "Integrated reporting: A structured literature review," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 166-185, September.
    7. Aino Kianto, 2007. "What do we really mean by the dynamic dimension of intellectual capital?," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(4), pages 342-356.
    8. José Maria Viedma Marti & Maria Rosário Cabrita, 2012. "The Knowledge Economy," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Entrepreneurial Excellence in the Knowledge Economy, chapter 1, pages 10-39, Palgrave Macmillan.
    9. Bontis, Nick & Dragonetti, Nicola C. & Jacobsen, Kristine & Roos, Göran, 1999. "The knowledge toolbox:: A review of the tools available to measure and manage intangible resources," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 391-402, August.
    10. Aldo Romano & Giuseppina Passiante & Pasquale Del Vecchio & Giustina Secundo, 2014. "The innovation ecosystem as booster for the innovative entrepreneurship in the smart specialisation strategy," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(3), pages 271-288.
    11. Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2017. "Dynamic Capabilities of Universities in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(4), pages 577-595, December.
    12. Habersam, Michael & Piber, Martin & Skoog, Matti, 2013. "Knowledge balance sheets in Austrian universities: The implementation, use, and re-shaping of measurement and management practices," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 319-337.
    13. Constantin Bratianu & Simona Vasilache, 2010. "A factorial analysis of the managerial linear thinking model," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(4), pages 393-407.
    14. Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2017. "Universities in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(2), pages 251-271, June.
    15. Viorel Lefter & Constantin Brătianu & Adriana Agapie & Simona Agoston & Ivona Orzea, 2011. "Intergenerational knowledge transfer in the academic environment of knowledge-based economy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(30), pages 392-403, June.
    16. Mitsuru Kodama, 2011. "Knowledge Integration Dynamics and Strategic Innovation Capability," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Knowledge Integration Dynamics Developing Strategic Innovation Capability, chapter 9, pages 283-325, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    17. Ettore Bolisani & Alessandro Oltramari, 2012. "Knowledge as a measurable object in business contexts: a stock-and-flow approach," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 275-286, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2017. "Dynamic Capabilities of Universities in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(4), pages 577-595, December.
    2. Ruxandra Bejinaru & Cristian Valentin Hapenciuc & Iulian Condratov & Pavel Stanciu, 2018. "The University Role in Developing the Human Capital for a Sustainable Bioeconomy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 583-583, August.
    3. Tünde Zita Kovács & Beáta Bittner & László Huzsvai & András Nábrádi, 2022. "Convergence and the Matthew Effect in the European Union Based on the DESI Index," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Zhenyang Zhang & Xinyuan Wang & Dongphil Chun, 2021. "The U-Shaped Relationship between Intellectual Capital and Technological Innovation: A Perspective on Enterprise Ownership and the Moderating Effect of CSR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Băeşu Camelia & Bejinaru Ruxandra, 2020. "Knowledge management strategies for leadership in the digital business environment," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 646-656, July.
    6. Neamţu Daniela Mihaela & Bejinaru Ruxandra & Hapenciuc Cristian Valentin, 2020. "Challenges and opportunities for creative-innovative clusters partnerships," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 1057-1070, July.
    7. Brătianu Constantin, 2018. "A holistic view of the organizational knowledge dynamics," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 7-22, August.
    8. Bejinaru Ruxandra, 2018. "Assessing students’ entrepreneurial skills needed in the Knowledge Economy," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(3), pages 1119-1132, September.
    9. Hadad Shahrazad, 2018. "The geographic distribution of Knowledge Economy (KE) within the European Union (EU)," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(3), pages 1089-1107, September.
    10. Neamţu Daniela Mihaela & Hapenciuc Cristian-Valentin & Bejinaru Ruxandra, 2019. "The Impact of Digitalization on Business Sector Development in the Knowledge Economy," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 479-491, May.
    11. Bratianu Constantin, 2018. "A critical analysis of intellectual capital research in universities," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 151-160, May.
    12. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:49:p:583 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Mihaela Curea & Marilena Mironiuc & Maria Carmen Huian, 2022. "Intangibles, Firm Performance, and CEO Characteristics: Spotlight on the EU Electricity and Gas Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bratianu Constantin, 2018. "Intellectual capital research and practice: 7 myths and one golden rule," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 859-879, June.
    2. Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2018. "Factorial Analysis Perspectives upon StudentsÂ’ Skills in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 6(2), pages 265-284, June.
    3. Brătianu Constantin, 2018. "A holistic view of the organizational knowledge dynamics," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 7-22, August.
    4. Constantin BRATIANU & Florina PINZARU, 2015. "Challenges for the University Intellectual Capital in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 3(4), pages 609-627, December.
    5. Hadad Shahrazad, 2017. "Strategies for developing knowledge economy in Romania," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 416-430, September.
    6. Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2017. "Dynamic Capabilities of Universities in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(4), pages 577-595, December.
    7. Shahrazad HADAD, 2017. "Knowledge Economy: Characteristics and Dimensions," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(2), pages 203-225, June.
    8. Eduardo Tomé & Elizaveta Gromova, 2021. "Development of Emergent Knowledge Strategies and New Dynamic Capabilities for Business Education in a Time of Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2017. "Universities in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(2), pages 251-271, June.
    10. Maha Mohamed Alsebai Mohamed & Pingfeng Liu & Guihua Nie, 2022. "Do Knowledge Economy Indicators Affect Economic Growth? Evidence from Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-37, April.
    11. Bejinaru Ruxandra, 2018. "Assessing students’ entrepreneurial skills needed in the Knowledge Economy," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(3), pages 1119-1132, September.
    12. Kwee Keong Choong & Patrick W. Leung, 2022. "A Critical Review of the Precursors of the Knowledge Economy and Their Contemporary Research: Implications for the Computerized New Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1573-1610, June.
    13. Daniel RUSU, 2022. "Association of Knowledge Management with Strategic Management: Directions and Trends at International Level," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(1), pages 49-66, February.
    14. Nancy Vargas & M. Begoña Lloria & Salvador Roig-Dobón, 2016. "Main drivers of human capital, learning and performance," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(5), pages 961-978, October.
    15. Constantin BRATIANU, 2016. "Knowledge Dynamics," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 4(3), pages 323-337, September.
    16. Hadad Shahrazad & Cantaragiu Ramona, 2018. "Civic Engagement Index (CEI) - the case of liberal arts universities from Romania," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 1080-1088, May.
    17. Rocco Frondizi & Chiara Fantauzzi & Nathalie Colasanti & Gloria Fiorani, 2019. "The Evaluation of Universities’ Third Mission and Intellectual Capital: Theoretical Analysis and Application to Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Nonaka, Ikujiro & Kodama, Mitsuru & Hirose, Ayano & Kohlbacher, Florian, 2014. "Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformation – A new paradigm for organizational theory," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 137-146.
    19. Staniewski, Marcin W. & Janowski, Konrad & Awruk, Katarzyna, 2016. "Entrepreneurial personality dispositions and selected indicators of company functioning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1939-1943.
    20. Jinhyo Joseph Yun & Zheng Liu & Euiseob Jeong & Sangwoo Kim & Kyunghun Kim, 2022. "The Difference in Open Innovation between Open Access and Closed Access, According to the Change of Collective Intelligence and Knowledge Amount," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:12:y:2017:i:3:p:500-523:n:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.