IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v12y2018i1p1080-1088n97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Civic Engagement Index (CEI) - the case of liberal arts universities from Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Hadad Shahrazad
  • Cantaragiu Ramona

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

We have arrived to a moment in history when the society we are living in is confronted with different sets of problems: hunger, crime, economic crises, natural disasters or cataclysms, and various human rights violations. At the moment the most appropriate way to solve these problems still lies with the organisms of the nation state. As such, the lack of civic sense and the increasing political apathy will only allow these problems to grow out of proportions. We are of the opinion that most of them can be counteracted if we try to educate the civic sense in people. By civic sense or engagement we understand a type of orientation towards being involved in social groups according to democratic principles. It is said the post-socialist countries are particularly threatened by the lack of civic engagement on behalf of their citizens that have reached the point where they take democracy for granted. This is why we explore the role played by universities in developing and shaping this civic attitude amongst young people. In order to do so, we resorted to questionnaires applied in liberal arts universities in Romania. These universities have a special relation to democratic principles, national pride and the perpetuation of the nation state as an ideal for its citizens and because of this we believe they represent a proper starting point for the current investigation. The areas that are targeted through the questionnaire are the following: the academic environment, the methods through which civic values are instilled in the hearts and minds of the students, and the institutional and personal factors that determine faculty to introduce civic values in their academic environments. Using the results we create the Civic Engagement Index (CEI) that can be used as a valuable benchmarking mechanism for those universities that are trying to enhance their civic engagement activities. Finally, we test the hypothesis that certain universities fail to create civic-oriented graduates and we propose ways in which the organizational culture could be transformed into a more supportive one: civic participation guides, civic responsibility classes, and service learning classes for faculty members to increase their openness towards the promotion of civic values.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadad Shahrazad & Cantaragiu Ramona, 2018. "Civic Engagement Index (CEI) - the case of liberal arts universities from Romania," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 1080-1088, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:1080-1088:n:97
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2018-0097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2018-0097
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2018-0097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2017. "Dynamic Capabilities of Universities in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(4), pages 577-595, December.
    2. Ramona CANTARAGIU & Carmen PĂUNESCU & Shahrazad HADAD, 2014. "The social impact of university entrepreneurship in Romania: Is the institutional discourse replicated or adapted?," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 9(4), Winter.
    3. Peter Johnson & Pamela Robinson, 2014. "Civic Hackathons: Innovation, Procurement, or Civic Engagement?," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 31(4), pages 349-357, July.
    4. Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2017. "Universities in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(2), pages 251-271, June.
    5. Constantin BRATIANU & Stefan STANCIU, 2010. "An overview of present research related to the entrepreneurial university," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 5(2), Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bejinaru Ruxandra, 2018. "Assessing students’ entrepreneurial skills needed in the Knowledge Economy," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(3), pages 1119-1132, September.
    2. Hadad Shahrazad, 2017. "Strategies for developing knowledge economy in Romania," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 416-430, September.
    3. Bratianu Constantin, 2018. "Intellectual capital research and practice: 7 myths and one golden rule," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 859-879, June.
    4. Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2018. "Factorial Analysis Perspectives upon StudentsÂ’ Skills in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 6(2), pages 265-284, June.
    5. Kareem Mohanad Ali & Alameer Alaa Abdulameer Ahmed, 2019. "The Impact of Dynamic Capabilities on Organizational Effectiveness," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 14(4), pages 402-418, December.
    6. Bejinaru Ruxandra, 2017. "Knowledge strategies aiming to improve the intellectual capital of universities," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 500-523, September.
    7. Daniela Mihaela Neamțu & Cristian-Valentin Hapenciuc & Ruxandra Bejinaru, 2019. "Reflections of Data and Theory of Leadership Communication Strategies," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 558-566, December.
    8. Eduardo Tomé & Elizaveta Gromova, 2021. "Development of Emergent Knowledge Strategies and New Dynamic Capabilities for Business Education in a Time of Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Allan LAWRENCE & Christopher BAMBER & Enis ELEZI, 2017. "E-learning Solutions for a Changing Global Market. An Analysis of Two Comparative Case Studies," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(4), pages 597-618, December.
    10. Pamela Robinson & Peter A. Johnson, 2021. "Pandemic-Driven Technology Adoption: Public Decision Makers Need to Tread Cautiously," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 10(2), pages 59-65, April.
    11. Agnieszka Herdan & Magdalena Maria Stuss, 2019. "Shaping The Competences Of Graduates Of Higher Education For The Needs Of The Eu Labour Market - Case Study Of Business School Students," Proceedings of Teaching and Education Conferences 8411187, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    12. Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2017. "Dynamic Capabilities of Universities in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(4), pages 577-595, December.
    13. Gabriel Brătucu & Radu Constantin Lixăndroiu & Cristinel Petrișor Constantin & Alina Simona Tecău & Ioana Bianca Chițu & Adrian Trifan, 2020. "Entrepreneurial University: Catalyst for Regional Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Perng, Sung-Yueh, 2017. "Practices and politics of collaborative urban infrastructuring: Traffic Light Box Artworks in Dublin Streets," OSF Preprints 2xpq7, Center for Open Science.
    15. Carmen Păunescu & Mihaela Cornelia Popescu & Matthias Duennweber, 2018. "Factors Determining Desirability of Entrepreneurship in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Corina PELAU & Patricia ZEGREANU, 2010. "Mobile Marketing – the marketing for the next generation," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 5(2), Summer.
    17. Obwegeser, Nikolaus & Müller, Sune Dueholm, 2018. "Innovation and public procurement: Terminology, concepts, and applications," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 74, pages 1-17.
    18. Pauline McGuirk & Robyn Dowling & Pratichi Chatterjee, 2021. "Municipal Statecraft For The Smart City: Retooling The Smart Entrepreneurial City?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(7), pages 1730-1748, October.
    19. Argatu Ruxandra, 2018. "Analysis of social models in Central and Eastern Europe - A focus on poverty and social exclusion," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 80-92, May.
    20. Engelbert, Jiska & van Zoonen, Liesbet & Hirzalla, Fadi, 2019. "Excluding citizens from the European smart city: The discourse practices of pursuing and granting smartness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 347-353.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:1080-1088:n:97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.