IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v31y2014i4p349-357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Civic Hackathons: Innovation, Procurement, or Civic Engagement?

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Johnson
  • Pamela Robinson

Abstract

At all levels, governments around the world are moving toward the provision of open data, that is, the direct provision to citizens, the private sector, and other third parties, of raw government datasets, controlled by a relatively permissible license. In tandem with this distribution of open data is the promotion of civic hackathons, or “app contests” by government. The civic hackathon is designed to offer prize money to developers as a way to spur innovative use of open data, more specifically the creation of commercial software applications that deliver services to citizens. Within this context, we propose that the civic hackathon has the potential to act in multiple ways, possibly as a backdoor to the traditional government procurement process, and as a form of civic engagement. We move beyond much of the hype of civic hackathons, critically framing an approach to understanding civic hackathons through these two lenses. Key questions for future research emphasize the emerging, and important, nature of this research path.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Johnson & Pamela Robinson, 2014. "Civic Hackathons: Innovation, Procurement, or Civic Engagement?," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 31(4), pages 349-357, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:31:y:2014:i:4:p:349-357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ropr.12074
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pamela J. Robinson & Peter A. Johnson, 2016. "Civic Hackathons: New Terrain for Local Government-Citizen Interaction?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 65-74.
    2. Senna, Pedro P. & Bonnin Roca, Jaime & Barros, Ana C., 2023. "Overcoming barriers to manufacturing digitalization: Policies across EU countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Perng, Sung-Yueh, 2017. "Practices and politics of collaborative urban infrastructuring: Traffic Light Box Artworks in Dublin Streets," OSF Preprints 2xpq7, Center for Open Science.
    4. Obwegeser, Nikolaus & Müller, Sune Dueholm, 2018. "Innovation and public procurement: Terminology, concepts, and applications," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 74, pages 1-17.
    5. Engelbert, Jiska & van Zoonen, Liesbet & Hirzalla, Fadi, 2019. "Excluding citizens from the European smart city: The discourse practices of pursuing and granting smartness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 347-353.
    6. Pauline McGuirk & Robyn Dowling & Pratichi Chatterjee, 2021. "Municipal Statecraft For The Smart City: Retooling The Smart Entrepreneurial City?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(7), pages 1730-1748, October.
    7. Ben Heller & Atar Amir & Roy Waxman & Yossi Maaravi, 2023. "Hack your organizational innovation: literature review and integrative model for running hackathons," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    8. Adriano Tanda & Alberto De Marco, 2021. "A Review of an Urban Living Lab Initiative," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(3), pages 370-390, May.
    9. Hadad Shahrazad & Cantaragiu Ramona, 2018. "Civic Engagement Index (CEI) - the case of liberal arts universities from Romania," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 1080-1088, May.
    10. Mora, Luca & Deakin, Mark & Reid, Alasdair, 2019. "Strategic principles for smart city development: A multiple case study analysis of European best practices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 70-97.
    11. Pamela Robinson & Peter A. Johnson, 2021. "Pandemic-Driven Technology Adoption: Public Decision Makers Need to Tread Cautiously," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 10(2), pages 59-65, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:31:y:2014:i:4:p:349-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.