IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v1y2016i2p65-74.html

Civic Hackathons: New Terrain for Local Government-Citizen Interaction?

Author

Listed:
  • Pamela J. Robinson

    (School of Urban and Regional Planning, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada)

  • Peter A. Johnson

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada)

Abstract

As more and more governments share open data, tech developers respond by creating apps using these data to generate content or provide services that citizens may find useful. More recently, there is an increase in popularity of the civic hackathon. These time-limited events gather tech enthusiasts, government workers and interested citizens, in a collaborative environment to apply government open data in developing software applications that address issues of shared civic importance. Building on the Johnson and Robinson (2014) framework for understanding the civic hackathon phenomenon, Canadian municipal staff with civic hackathon experience were interviewed about their motivations for and benefits derived from participation in these events. Two broad themes emerged from these interviews. First, through the development of prototypical apps using municipal open data and other data sets, civic hackathons help put open data into public use. Second, civic hackathons provide government staff with valuable feedback about municipal open data sets informing and evolving future open data releases. This paper concludes with reflections for urban planners about how civic hackathons might be used in their practice and with recommendations for municipal staff considering using civic hackathons to add value to municipal open data.

Suggested Citation

  • Pamela J. Robinson & Peter A. Johnson, 2016. "Civic Hackathons: New Terrain for Local Government-Citizen Interaction?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 65-74.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v1:y:2016:i:2:p:65-74
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v1i2.627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/627
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v1i2.627?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teresa M. Harrison & Theresa A. Pardo & Meghan Cook, 2012. "Creating Open Government Ecosystems: A Research and Development Agenda," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-29, October.
    2. Peter Johnson & Pamela Robinson, 2014. "Civic Hackathons: Innovation, Procurement, or Civic Engagement?," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 31(4), pages 349-357, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thiel, Thorsten & Berg, Sebastian & Clute-Simon, Veza & Rakowski, Niklas, 2023. "Innovating Democracy? Analyzing the #WirVsVirus Hackathon," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 3(1), pages 1-26.
    2. Gordon Kuo Siong Tan, 2022. "Citizens go digital: A discursive examination of digital payments in Singapore’s Smart Nation project," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(12), pages 2582-2598, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei, Qingfang & Liu, Yuan & Cai, Weixing & Wan, Jiangtao, 2025. "Open government data and personal default: Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    2. Mohammad Moradi & Mojtaba Mazoochi & Mohammad Ahmadi, 2022. "A Comprehensive Method for Improving the Quality of Open Government Data and Increasing Citizens’ Willingness to Use Data by Analyzing the Complex System of Citizens and Organizations," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    3. Pamela Robinson & Peter A. Johnson, 2021. "Pandemic-Driven Technology Adoption: Public Decision Makers Need to Tread Cautiously," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 10(2), pages 59-65, April.
    4. Sanja Seljan & Marina Viličić & Zvonimir Nevistić & Luka Dedić & Marina Grubišić & Iva Cibilić & Karlo Kević & Bastiaan van Loenen & Frederika Welle Donker & Charalampos Alexopoulos, 2022. "Open Data as a Condition for Smart Application Development: Assessing Access to Hospitals in Croatian Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Yi Luo & Zhiwei Tang & Peiqi Fan, 2021. "Could Government Data Openness Enhance Urban Innovation Capability? An Evaluation Based on Multistage DID Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Thiel, Thorsten & Berg, Sebastian & Clute-Simon, Veza & Rakowski, Niklas, 2023. "Innovating Democracy? Analyzing the #WirVsVirus Hackathon," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 3(1), pages 1-26.
    7. Hadad Shahrazad & Cantaragiu Ramona, 2018. "Civic Engagement Index (CEI) - the case of liberal arts universities from Romania," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Paradigm, vol. 12(1), pages 1080-1088, May.
    8. Perng, Sung-Yueh, 2017. "Practices and politics of collaborative urban infrastructuring: Traffic Light Box Artworks in Dublin Streets," OSF Preprints 2xpq7, Center for Open Science.
    9. Monika Mačiulienė & Eglė Butkevičienė, 2022. "The Ecosystem Approach in Addressing Sustainable Development Goals through Citizen Science in Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    10. World Bank Group, 2016. "Evaluating Digital Citizen Engagement," World Bank Publications - Reports 23752, The World Bank Group.
    11. Obwegeser, Nikolaus & Müller, Sune Dueholm, 2018. "Innovation and public procurement: Terminology, concepts, and applications," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 74, pages 1-17.
    12. Pauline McGuirk & Robyn Dowling & Pratichi Chatterjee, 2021. "Municipal Statecraft For The Smart City: Retooling The Smart Entrepreneurial City?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(7), pages 1730-1748, October.
    13. repec:osf:osfxxx:2xpq7_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Engelbert, Jiska & van Zoonen, Liesbet & Hirzalla, Fadi, 2019. "Excluding citizens from the European smart city: The discourse practices of pursuing and granting smartness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 347-353.
    15. Ben Heller & Atar Amir & Roy Waxman & Yossi Maaravi, 2023. "Hack your organizational innovation: literature review and integrative model for running hackathons," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    16. Mora, Luca & Deakin, Mark & Reid, Alasdair, 2019. "Strategic principles for smart city development: A multiple case study analysis of European best practices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 70-97.
    17. Pamela J. Robinson & Peter A. Johnson, 2016. "Civic Hackathons: New Terrain for Local Government-Citizen Interaction?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 65-74.
    18. Pongmanut Deeod & Narong Kiettikunwong, 2026. "Information Disclosure, Public Trust, and Social Satisfaction as Indicators of Good Governance and Quality of Life: Evidence from Local Administrative Organizations in Rural Thailand," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 335-352, March.
    19. Michael Crilly & Georgiana Varna & Alec Coaker & Rhodri Cenek Gibbon & Joshua Jackson & Niamh Ellen McDonald & Deegan Ramsey Smith, 2026. "Experimenting With Gamification and Geogames in Urban Planning: A Systematic Literature Review," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11.
    20. Adriano Tanda & Alberto De Marco, 2021. "A Review of an Urban Living Lab Initiative," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(3), pages 370-390, May.
    21. Senna, Pedro P. & Bonnin Roca, Jaime & Barros, Ana C., 2023. "Overcoming barriers to manufacturing digitalization: Policies across EU countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v1:y:2016:i:2:p:65-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.