IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v13y2022i2d10.1007_s13132-021-00734-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Critical Review of the Precursors of the Knowledge Economy and Their Contemporary Research: Implications for the Computerized New Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Kwee Keong Choong

    (Apt Visionary & Innovation)

  • Patrick W. Leung

    (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Despite nearly fifty-eight years since the term knowledge economy first appears, we are getting nearer in understanding this new kind of economy. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the meaning of the knowledge economy by conducting a critical review of the precursors of the knowledge economy and their major critiques so as to identify the current research implications. We aim to identify common ground in advancing the research of the knowledge economy. In essence, our understanding of the knowledge economy is viewed from a ‘new’ social-economic-theoretical perspective in which the theoretical foundation focuses on the explosion of technology that motivates people to be innovative and possess knowledge in producing knowledge products or be so engrossed with sociability using technology at home. Our finding is that the notion of the knowledge economy must be viewed from some phenomena that have transformed the contemporary economy. Other major findings include the following: (1) we use the term knowledge economy instead of the multiplicity of terms to describe this new form of economy; (2) we articulate that the theoretical foundation of the knowledge economy is a branch of social economy where the economy is not based solely on production and consumption but is based more on social values, technology, knowledge and innovation to commercialize knowledge products; and (3) the statistical assessment methodology is delivered through the use of indicators to proxy for the four knowledge economy criteria that makes up the knowledge economy. This has the following implications for economic management, knowledge-induced innovation, computerization of the economy, and knowledge management in the new economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwee Keong Choong & Patrick W. Leung, 2022. "A Critical Review of the Precursors of the Knowledge Economy and Their Contemporary Research: Implications for the Computerized New Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1573-1610, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:13:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s13132-021-00734-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-021-00734-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-021-00734-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-021-00734-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jorge Garza-Rodriguez & Natalia Almeida-Velasco & Susana Gonzalez-Morales & Alma P. Leal-Ornelas, 2020. "The Impact of Human Capital on Economic Growth: the Case of Mexico," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(2), pages 660-675, June.
    2. Christina Öberg, 2010. "Customer Roles In Innovations," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 989-1011.
    3. Wang, Jue, 2018. "Innovation and government intervention: A comparison of Singapore and Hong Kong," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 399-412.
    4. Shahrazad HADAD, 2017. "Knowledge Economy: Characteristics and Dimensions," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(2), pages 203-225, June.
    5. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    6. Gwang-Nam Rim & Gang-Sok Kim & Sun-Hui Hwang & Un-Dok Ko, 2019. "Some Problems in Statistically Assessing the Level of Knowledge Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(3), pages 974-996, September.
    7. Ikujiro Nonaka & Georg von Krogh, 2009. "Perspective---Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 635-652, June.
    8. Paul Hildreth & Chris Kimble, 2002. "The Duality of Knowledge," Post-Print halshs-00492437, HAL.
    9. Philippe Aghion & Richard Blundell & Rachel Griffith & Peter Howitt & Susanne Prantl, 2004. "Entry and Productivity Growth: Evidence from Microlevel Panel Data," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 2(2-3), pages 265-276, 04/05.
    10. Conklin,David W., 1991. "Comparative Economic Systems," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521344395.
    11. Huarng, Kun-Huang & Mas-Tur, Alicia, 2016. "Turning Kurt Lewin on his head: Nothing is so theoretical as a good practice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4725-4731.
    12. Stephen Gourlay, 2006. "Conceptualizing Knowledge Creation: A Critique of Nonaka's Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(7), pages 1415-1436, November.
    13. Godin, Benoit, 2004. "The New Economy: what the concept owes to the OECD," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 679-690, July.
    14. Conklin,David W., 1991. "Comparative Economic Systems," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521348898.
    15. Oihab Allal-Chérif & Marc Bidan & Mohamed Makhlouf, 2016. "Using serious games to manage knowledge and competencies: The seven-step development process," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1153-1163, December.
    16. Allal-Chérif, Oihab & Makhlouf, Mohamed, 2016. "Using serious games to manage knowledge: The SECI model perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1539-1543.
    17. Lynch, Richard & Jin, Zhongqi, 2016. "Knowledge and innovation in emerging market multinationals: The expansion paradox," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1593-1597.
    18. Smith, Keith, 2002. "What is the 'Knowledge Economy'? Knowledge Intensity and Distributed Knowledge Bases," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2002-06, United Nations University - INTECH.
    19. Benoît Godin, 2006. "The Knowledge-Based Economy: Conceptual Framework or Buzzword?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 17-30, January.
    20. Noura Eissa, 2020. "Pandemic Preparedness and Public Health Expenditure," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chris Kimble, 2013. "Knowledge management, codification and tacit knowledge," Post-Print halshs-00826911, HAL.
    2. Giovana Escrivão & Marcelo Seido Nagano, 2016. "Linking Knowledge Creation and Environmental Education," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Isabelle Le Breton-Miller & Danny Miller, 2015. "The paradox of resource vulnerability: Considerations for organizational curatorship," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 397-415, March.
    4. Thuy Do & Frédéric Le Roy & Thuy Seran, 2021. "Cooperation between global and local firms in emerging markets: a coopetition approach The case in Vietnam," Post-Print hal-03215229, HAL.
    5. Jamal Shamsie & Michael J. Mannor, 2013. "Looking Inside the Dream Team: Probing Into the Contributions of Tacit Knowledge as an Organizational Resource," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 513-529, April.
    6. Isabelle Le Breton–Miller & Danny Miller, 2015. "The Arts and Family Business: Linking Family Business Resources and Performance to Industry Characteristics," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(6), pages 1349-1370, November.
    7. Haradhan Kumar Mohajan, 2016. "Knowledge is an Essential Element at Present World," International Journal of Publication and Social Studies, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 1(1), pages 31-53.
    8. Dufva, Mikko & Ahlqvist, Toni, 2015. "Knowledge creation dynamics in foresight: A knowledge typology and exploratory method to analyse foresight workshops," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 251-268.
    9. Maria Jakubik, 2018. "Practice Ecosystem of Knowledge Co-Creation," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 7(2), pages 199-216.
    10. Hakmaoui, Abdelati & Oubrich, Mourad & Calof, Jonathan & El Ghazi, Hamid, 2022. "Towards an anticipatory system incorporating corporate foresight and competitive intelligence in creating knowledge: a longitudinal Moroccan bank case study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Niamh Brennan & Collette E. Kirwan & John Redmond, 2016. "Accountability Processes in Boardrooms: A Conceptual Model of Manager-Non-Executive Director Information Asymmetry," Open Access publications 10197/7652, Research Repository, University College Dublin.
    12. Saif Al Weshahi, 2023. "The Perspectives of Academic Leaders on Positioning Higher Education for the Knowledge Economy in Oman: Challenges and Opportunities," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 1-1, February.
    13. Esterhuizen, D. & Schutte, C.S.L. & du Toit, A.S.A., 2012. "Knowledge creation processes as critical enablers for innovation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 354-364.
    14. Canonico, Paolo & De Nito, Ernesto & Esposito, Vincenza & Pezzillo Iacono, Mario & Consiglio, Stefano, 2020. "Knowledge creation in the automotive industry: Analysing obeya-oriented practices using the SECI model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 450-457.
    15. Ikujiro Nonaka & Georg von Krogh, 2009. "Perspective---Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 635-652, June.
    16. Bi, Jianxiang & Sarpong, David & Botchie, David & Rao-Nicholson, Rekha, 2017. "From imitation to innovation: The discursive processes of knowledge creation in the Chinese space industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 261-270.
    17. Haradhan Kumar Mohajan, 2017. "Knowledge is an Essential Element at Present World," International Journal of Publication and Social Studies, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 1(1), pages 31-53, June.
    18. Kawai, Norifumi & Chung, Chul, 2019. "Expatriate utilization, subsidiary knowledge creation and performance: The moderating role of subsidiary strategic context," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 24-36.
    19. Deist, Maximilian K. & McDowell, William C. & Bouncken, Ricarda B., 2023. "Digital units and digital innovation: Balancing fluidity and stability for the Creation, Conversion, and Dissemination of sticky knowledge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    20. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2016. "Sharing of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations: A Review," MPRA Paper 82958, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jun 2016.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:13:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s13132-021-00734-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.