IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p9105-d1164153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Causal Relationships among Enablers of the Construction 5.0 Paradigm: Integration of Operator 5.0 and Society 5.0 with Human-Centricity, Sustainability, and Resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Ibrahim Yitmen

    (Department of Construction Engineering and Lighting Science, School of Engineering, Jönköping University, 551 11 Jönköping, Sweden)

  • Amjad Almusaed

    (Department of Construction Engineering and Lighting Science, School of Engineering, Jönköping University, 551 11 Jönköping, Sweden)

  • Sepehr Alizadehsalehi

    (Project Management Program, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208-3109, USA)

Abstract

The Construction 5.0 paradigm is the next phase in industrial development that aims to combine the skills of human experts in partnership with efficient and precise machines to achieve production solutions that are resource-efficient and preferred by clients. This study reviewed the evolution of the Construction 5.0 paradigm by defining its features and diverse nature. It introduced the architecture, model, and system of Construction 5.0 and its key enablers: Operator 5.0, Society 5.0, human-centricity, sustainability, and resilience. The study used the SEM method to evaluate the research model and investigate the causal relationships among the key enablers of the Construction 5.0 paradigm. Nine vital hypotheses were proposed and assessed comprehensively. The critical enablers’ variables were measured to examine the constructs’ reliability and validity. The key findings showed that Construction 5.0 prioritizes collaboration between humans and machines, merges cyberspace with physical space, and balances the three pillars of sustainability (economy, environment, and society), creating a relationship among Operator 5.0, Society 5.0, human-Ccentricity, sustainability, and resilience. The study also discussed the limitations and challenges and offered suggestions for future research. Overall, Construction 5.0 aims to achieve sustainable development and become a robust and resilient provider of prosperity in an industrial community of a shared future. The study expects to spark debate and promote pioneering research toward the Construction 5.0 paradigm.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibrahim Yitmen & Amjad Almusaed & Sepehr Alizadehsalehi, 2023. "Investigating the Causal Relationships among Enablers of the Construction 5.0 Paradigm: Integration of Operator 5.0 and Society 5.0 with Human-Centricity, Sustainability, and Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:9105-:d:1164153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9105/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9105/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leng, Jiewu & Ruan, Guolei & Jiang, Pingyu & Xu, Kailin & Liu, Qiang & Zhou, Xueliang & Liu, Chao, 2020. "Blockchain-empowered sustainable manufacturing and product lifecycle management in industry 4.0: A survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Andrew Kusiak, 2020. "Open manufacturing: a design-for-resilience approach," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(15), pages 4647-4658, July.
    3. Fabio De Felice & Marta Travaglioni & Antonella Petrillo, 2021. "Innovation Trajectories for a Society 5.0," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-30, November.
    4. Dmitry Ivanov, 2023. "The Industry 5.0 framework: viability-based integration of the resilience, sustainability, and human-centricity perspectives," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(5), pages 1683-1695, March.
    5. Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "Sustainability learnings from the COVID-19 crisis. Opportunities for resilient industry and business development," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(5), pages 889-897, November.
    6. Peter M. Bednar & Christine Welch, 2020. "Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 281-298, April.
    7. Thuy Duong Oesterreich & Julian Schuir & Frank Teuteberg, 2020. "The Emperor’s New Clothes or an Enduring IT Fashion? Analyzing the Lifecycle of Industry 4.0 through the Lens of Management Fashion Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-29, October.
    8. Fukuda, Kayano, 2020. "Science, technology and innovation ecosystem transformation toward society 5.0," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    9. Andrew Kusiak, 2022. "From digital to universal manufacturing," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(1), pages 349-360, January.
    10. Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "Sustainability learnings from the COVID-19 crisis. Opportunities for resilient industry and business development," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(5), pages 889-897, November.
    11. Matthew E. Gladden, 2019. "Who Will Be the Members of Society 5.0? Towards an Anthropology of Technologically Posthumanized Future Societies," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-39, May.
    12. Xiang T. R. Kong & Hao Luo & George Q. Huang & Xuan Yang, 2019. "Industrial wearable system: the human-centric empowering technology in Industry 4.0," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(8), pages 2853-2869, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre & Sokolov, Boris, 2022. "Cloud supply chain: Integrating Industry 4.0 and digital platforms in the “Supply Chain-as-a-Service”," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Barbara Aquilani & Michela Piccarozzi & Tindara Abbate & Anna Codini, 2020. "The Role of Open Innovation and Value Co-creation in the Challenging Transition from Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0: Toward a Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Carolina Narvaez Rojas & Gustavo Adolfo Alomia Peñafiel & Diego Fernando Loaiza Buitrago & Carlos Andrés Tavera Romero, 2021. "Society 5.0: A Japanese Concept for a Superintelligent Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Padmanathan Kasinathan & Rishi Pugazhendhi & Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan & Vigna Kumaran Ramachandaramurthy & Vinoth Ramanathan & Senthilkumar Subramanian & Sachin Kumar & Kamalakannan Nandhagopal & , 2022. "Realization of Sustainable Development Goals with Disruptive Technologies by Integrating Industry 5.0, Society 5.0, Smart Cities and Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-31, November.
    5. Hien Nguyen Ngoc & Ganix Lasa & Ion Iriarte, 2022. "Human-centred design in industry 4.0: case study review and opportunities for future research," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 35-76, January.
    6. Andrew Kusiak, 2024. "Hyper-automation in manufacturing industry," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 1-2, January.
    7. Maria José Sá & Sandro Serpa & Carlos Miguel Ferreira, 2022. "Citizen Science in the Promotion of Sustainability: The Importance of Smart Education for Smart Societies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Hanlie Smuts & Alta Van der Merwe, 2022. "Knowledge Management in Society 5.0: A Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-27, June.
    9. Roblek Vasja & Meško Maja & Podbregar Iztok, 2021. "Mapping of the Emergence of Society 5.0: A Bibliometric Analysis," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 54(4), pages 293-305, December.
    10. Su, Dan & Zhang, Lijun & Peng, Hua & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee, 2023. "Technical challenges of blockchain technology for sustainable manufacturing paradigm in Industry 4.0 era using a fuzzy decision support system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    11. Naseri, F. & Gil, S. & Barbu, C. & Cetkin, E. & Yarimca, G. & Jensen, A.C. & Larsen, P.G. & Gomes, C., 2023. "Digital twin of electric vehicle battery systems: Comprehensive review of the use cases, requirements, and platforms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    12. Matthew Gladden, 2019. "Understanding the cyber-physical-social-intentional Workforce 4.0," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 3, pages 15-26.
    13. Chiara Cimini & David Romero & Roberto Pinto & Sergio Cavalieri, 2023. "Task Classification Framework and Job-Task Analysis Method for Understanding the Impact of Smart and Digital Technologies on the Operators 4.0 Job Profiles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-28, February.
    14. Marić, Josip & Opazo-Basáez, Marco & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina, 2023. "Innovation management of three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology: Disclosing insights from existing literature and determining future research streams," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    15. Morteza Ghobakhloo & Mohammad Iranmanesh & Andrius Grybauskas & Mantas Vilkas & Monika Petraitė, 2021. "Industry 4.0, innovation, and sustainable development: A systematic review and a roadmap to sustainable innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 4237-4257, December.
    16. Aleksandrina V. Mavrodieva & Rajib Shaw, 2020. "Disaster and Climate Change Issues in Japan’s Society 5.0—A Discussion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    17. Muen Uddin & Shitharth Selvarajan & Muath Obaidat & Shams Ul Arfeen & Alaa O. Khadidos & Adil O. Khadidos & Maha Abdelhaq, 2023. "From Hype to Reality: Unveiling the Promises, Challenges and Opportunities of Blockchain in Supply Chain Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    18. Tal Ben-Zvi & Jerry Luftman, 2022. "Post-Pandemic IT: Digital Transformation and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-11, November.
    19. Emanuele Gabriel Margherita & Alessio Maria Braccini, 2021. "Exploring Sustainable Value Creation of Industry 4.0 Technologies Within the Socio-technical Perspective: A Meta-review," Post-Print hal-03410741, HAL.
    20. Guilherme F. Frederico, 2021. "From Supply Chain 4.0 to Supply Chain 5.0: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review and Research Directions," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:9105-:d:1164153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.