IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04834992.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Building a collaborative manufacturing system’s network resilience through an adaptability potential analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Selma Ferhat

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CGI - Centre Génie Industriel - IMT Mines Albi - IMT École nationale supérieure des Mines d'Albi-Carmaux - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

  • Raphaël Oger

    (CGI - Centre Génie Industriel - IMT Mines Albi - IMT École nationale supérieure des Mines d'Albi-Carmaux - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

  • Eric Ballot

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Matthieu Lauras

    (CGI - Centre Génie Industriel - IMT Mines Albi - IMT École nationale supérieure des Mines d'Albi-Carmaux - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

Abstract

Purpose This research aims to investigate how adaptability potential analysis in collaborative manufacturing networks can be used to enhance resilience when addressing innovative production challenges that require change initiatives. Design/methodology/approach A literature review on collaborative adaptive systems showed a lack of solutions to adapt production to an unpredicted product within a network. A framework is proposed for evaluating the adaptability of collaborative networks and providing inter-system adaptation recommendations. We demonstrate the applicability of this approach through an illustrative experimentation involving a cosmetic company seeking to produce a new product, hydroalcoholic gels in the context of collaborative networks. Findings The experimentation demonstrates that the adaptability analysis based on ontology can help different manufacturing systems make decisions based on their state and limits of capabilities. Also, our adaptation recommendations may help understand the economic impacts of collaboration for different scenarios before launching. Research limitations/implications The research scope does not extend to the consideration of quantity and operational aspects. Additionally, the reconfigurability aspects within each manufacturing system, such as the reordering of layout sequences, have not been addressed yet. Practical implications The results allow organizations to compare resilience states from an individual and collaborative perspective, enabling them to make informed decisions about new production opportunities and effectively navigate the changing manufacturing landscape. Originality/value This research combines capability-based analysis and a collaborative network perspective to streamline decision-making for systems facing new production demands. It provides new insights into effectual decision-making, empowering organizations to skilfully manage unexpected challenges and identify suitable partners accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Selma Ferhat & Raphaël Oger & Eric Ballot & Matthieu Lauras, 2024. "Building a collaborative manufacturing system’s network resilience through an adaptability potential analysis," Post-Print hal-04834992, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04834992
    DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-12-2023-1144
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04834992v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04834992v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/EJIM-12-2023-1144?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramezani, Javaneh & Camarinha-Matos, Luis M., 2020. "Approaches for resilience and antifragility in collaborative business ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Claire Palmer & Zahid Usman & Osiris Canciglieri Junior & Andreia Malucelli & Robert I. M. Young, 2018. "Interoperable manufacturing knowledge systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(8), pages 2733-2752, April.
    3. Francesco Paolo Appio & Antonella Martini & Silvia Massa & Stefania Testa, 2017. "Collaborative network of firms: antecedents and state-of-the-art properties," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(7), pages 2121-2134, April.
    4. Andrew Kusiak, 2022. "From digital to universal manufacturing," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(1), pages 349-360, January.
    5. Asad Asadzadeh & Amir Reza Khavarian-Garmsir & Ayyoob Sharifi & Pourya Salehi & Theo Kötter, 2022. "Transformative Resilience: An Overview of Its Structure, Evolution, and Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Kosmas Alexopoulos & Ioannis Anagiannis & Nikolaos Nikolakis & George Chryssolouris, 2022. "A quantitative approach to resilience in manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(24), pages 7178-7193, December.
    7. Andrew Thomas & Duc Truong Pham & Mark Francis & Ron Fisher, 2015. "Creating resilient and sustainable manufacturing businesses – a conceptual fitness model," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(13), pages 3934-3946, July.
    8. Raktim Pal & Nezih Altay, 2023. "The missing link in disruption management research: coping," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 433-449, March.
    9. Andrew Kusiak, 2020. "Open manufacturing: a design-for-resilience approach," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(15), pages 4647-4658, July.
    10. Eeva Järvenpää & Niko Siltala & Otto Hylli & Minna Lanz, 2019. "The development of an ontology for describing the capabilities of manufacturing resources," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 959-978, February.
    11. Myrna Mandell & Robyn Keast & Dan Chamberlain, 2017. "Collaborative networks and the need for a new management language," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 326-341, March.
    12. Fikret Berkes, 2017. "Environmental Governance for the Anthropocene? Social-Ecological Systems, Resilience, and Collaborative Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre & Sokolov, Boris, 2022. "Cloud supply chain: Integrating Industry 4.0 and digital platforms in the “Supply Chain-as-a-Service”," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Ibrahim Yitmen & Amjad Almusaed & Sepehr Alizadehsalehi, 2023. "Investigating the Causal Relationships among Enablers of the Construction 5.0 Paradigm: Integration of Operator 5.0 and Society 5.0 with Human-Centricity, Sustainability, and Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, June.
    3. Andrew Kusiak, 2024. "Hyper-automation in manufacturing industry," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 1-2, January.
    4. Baier-Fuentes, Hugo & Andrade-Valbuena, Nelson A. & Huertas Gonzalez-Serrano, Maria & Gaviria-Marin, Magaly, 2023. "Bricolage as an effective tool for the survival of owner-managed SMEs during crises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Mikko Kurenlahti & Arto O. Salonen, 2018. "Rethinking Consumerism from the Perspective of Religion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    6. da Silva, Agostinho & Almeida, Isabel, 2020. "Towards INDUSTRY 4.0 | a case STUDY in ornamental stone sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Yu, Yanan & He, Yong & Zhao, Xuan, 2021. "Impact of demand information sharing on organic farming adoption: An evolutionary game approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Xu, Kunliang & Shao, Yanmin & Hu, Yiwen, 2025. "Responding to perceived environmental policy uncertainty with green technological innovation engagement: Evidence from a text-based measure," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    9. Ming Lu & Zhuolin Tan & Chao Yuan & Yu Dong & Wei Dong, 2023. "Resilience Measurements and Dynamics of Resource-Based Cities in Heilongjiang Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    10. Wei, Shanting & Zhang, Zhuo & Ke, Ginger Y. & Chen, Xintong, 2019. "The more cooperation, the better? Optimizing enterprise cooperative strategy in collaborative innovation networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    11. Xi Zhao & Yuming Liu & Wenchao Jiang & Dongri Wei, 2023. "Study on the Factors Influencing and Mechanisms Shaping the Institutional Resilience of Mega Railway Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Dandan Ye & Martin J. Liu & Jun Luo & Natalia Yannopoulou, 2024. "How to Achieve Swift Resilience: the Role of Digital Innovation Enabled Mindfulness," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 551-573, April.
    13. Targetti, Stefano & Schaller, Lena L. & Kantelhardt, Jochen, 2021. "A fuzzy cognitive mapping approach for the assessment of public-goods governance in agricultural landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    14. Curtis, Kynda R. & Slocum, Susan L., 2022. "Research Report: Firm Resiliency Post-Economic Shock: A Case Study of Rural Wineries during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 53(01), March.
    15. Kathleen C. Williams & Leah M. Sharpe & Sebastian Paczuski & Keahna Margeson & Matthew C. Harwell, 2025. "How Bridging Approaches Further Relationships, Governance, and Ecosystem Services Research and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-23, May.
    16. Tasos Hovardas, 2021. "Social Sustainability as Social Learning: Insights from Multi-Stakeholder Environmental Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Xu, Xiaoyan & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chung, Sai-Ho & Guo, Shu, 2023. "Collaborative-commerce in supply chains: A review and classification of analytical models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    18. Alexandre de A. Gomes Júnior & Vanessa B. Schramm & Fernando Schramm, 2023. "Problem Structuring Methods in Social-Ecological Systems," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 461-478, June.
    19. Vassilios Makrakis, 2024. "Teachers’ Resilience Scale for Sustainability Enabled by ICT/Metaverse Learning Technologies: Factorial Structure, Reliability, and Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-12, September.
    20. Melanie Zurba & Dominic Stucker & Grace Mwaura & Catie Burlando & Archi Rastogi & Shalini Dhyani & Rebecca Koss, 2020. "Intergenerational Dialogue, Collaboration, Learning, and Decision-Making in Global Environmental Governance: The Case of the IUCN Intergenerational Partnership for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04834992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.