IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i11p3975-d179526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Āina Kaumaha: The Maintenance of Ancestral Principles for 21st Century Indigenous Resource Management

Author

Listed:
  • Natalie Kurashima

    (Kamehamea Schools, Natural and Cultural Resources, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA)

  • Jason Jeremiah

    (Kamehamea Schools, Natural and Cultural Resources, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA)

  • A. Nāmaka Whitehead

    (Kamehamea Schools, Natural and Cultural Resources, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA)

  • Jon Tulchin

    (Kamehamea Schools, Natural and Cultural Resources, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA)

  • Mililani Browning

    (Kamehamea Schools, Natural and Cultural Resources, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA)

  • Trever Duarte

    (Kamehamea Schools, Natural and Cultural Resources, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA)

Abstract

Globally, there is growing recongition of the essential role indigneous people have in biocultural conservation. However, there are few cases of applied indigenous resource management today, especially from the indigenous standpoint. In this paper, we provide an example of the maintenance and adaptation of an indigenous resource management system in Hawai‘i from the perspective of an instrumental ‘Ōiwi (Indigenous Hawaiian) social institution, Kamehameha Schools. Kamehameha Schools is not only the largest private landowner in Hawai‘i, but is uniquely tied to a lineage of traditional ali‘i (chiefs) resulting in present-day influence, decision-making authority, and wealth to fund a perpetual vision for its ancestral lands and communities. Notably, we share our journey from the perspective of indigenous resource managers, using the ‘Ōiwi methodology of mo‘okū‘auhau (genealogy and continuity) to guide our (re)discovery of what it means to steward in an indigenous way. First, we ground ourselves in ‘Ōiwi worldviews, recognizing our genealogical and reciprocal connections to ‘āina (land and sea). Then, we examine the functions of the traditional institution of the ali‘i and the chiefly principle of ‘āina kaumaha—a heavy obligation to steward the biocultural health of lands and seas in perpetuity. We detail how ‘āina kaumaha has manifested and transferred over generations, from traditional ali‘i to the royal Kamehameha line, to Kamehameha Schools as an ali‘i institution. Finally, we discuss how we endeavor to meet inherited obligations through Kamehameha Schools’ resource management approach today, which includes active stewardship of vast tracts of native ecosystems and Hawai‘i’s most important cultural sites, influencing biocultural well-being through representing ‘Ōiwi perspectives in diverse industries, and developing the next generation of ‘Ōiwi stewards. We provide a guide for indigenous organizations (re)defining their ancestral ways of stewardship, as well as for the many non-indigenous agencies with obligations to native lands and people today working to incorporate indigenous systems into their current management. Given that much of the world’s lands are indigenous spaces, we argue that the restoration of effective biocultural resource management systems worldwide requires the maintenance, and in some cases reestablishment, of indigenous institutions at multiple levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalie Kurashima & Jason Jeremiah & A. Nāmaka Whitehead & Jon Tulchin & Mililani Browning & Trever Duarte, 2018. "‘Āina Kaumaha: The Maintenance of Ancestral Principles for 21st Century Indigenous Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:3975-:d:179526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3975/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3975/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kekuhi Kealiikanakaoleohaililani & Natalie Kurashima & Kainana S. Francisco & Christian P. Giardina & Renee Pualani Louis & Heather McMillen & C. Kalā Asing & Kayla Asing & Tabetha A. Block & Mililani, 2018. "Ritual + Sustainability Science? A Portal into the Science of Aloha," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Trosper, Ronald L., 2002. "Northwest coast indigenous institutions that supported resilience and sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 329-344, May.
    3. Fikret Berkes, 2017. "Environmental Governance for the Anthropocene? Social-Ecological Systems, Resilience, and Collaborative Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Kanoeʻulalani Morishige & Pelika Andrade & Puaʻala Pascua & Kanoelani Steward & Emily Cadiz & Lauren Kapono & Uakoko Chong, 2018. "Nā Kilo ʻĀina: Visions of Biocultural Restoration through Indigenous Relationships between People and Place," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Richard Howitt, 2018. "Indigenous rights vital to survival," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(7), pages 339-340, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kevin Chang & Kawika B. Winter & Noa Kekuewa Lincoln, 2019. "Hawai‘i in Focus: Navigating Pathways in Global Biocultural Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, January.
    2. Leah L. Bremer & Kim Falinski & Casey Ching & Christopher A. Wada & Kimberly M. Burnett & Kanekoa Kukea-Shultz & Nicholas Reppun & Gregory Chun & Kirsten L.L. Oleson & Tamara Ticktin, 2018. "Biocultural Restoration of Traditional Agriculture: Cultural, Environmental, and Economic Outcomes of Lo‘i Kalo Restoration in He‘eia, O‘ahu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Kanoeʻulalani Morishige & Pelika Andrade & Puaʻala Pascua & Kanoelani Steward & Emily Cadiz & Lauren Kapono & Uakoko Chong, 2018. "Nā Kilo ʻĀina: Visions of Biocultural Restoration through Indigenous Relationships between People and Place," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Stoeckl, Natalie & Jarvis, Diane & Larson, Silva & Larson, Anna & Grainger, Daniel & Ewamian Aboriginal Corporation,, 2021. "Australian Indigenous insights into ecosystem services: Beyond services towards connectedness – People, place and time," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    5. Mikko Kurenlahti & Arto O. Salonen, 2018. "Rethinking Consumerism from the Perspective of Religion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Ming Lu & Zhuolin Tan & Chao Yuan & Yu Dong & Wei Dong, 2023. "Resilience Measurements and Dynamics of Resource-Based Cities in Heilongjiang Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Targetti, Stefano & Schaller, Lena L. & Kantelhardt, Jochen, 2021. "A fuzzy cognitive mapping approach for the assessment of public-goods governance in agricultural landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    8. Melanie Zurba & Dominic Stucker & Grace Mwaura & Catie Burlando & Archi Rastogi & Shalini Dhyani & Rebecca Koss, 2020. "Intergenerational Dialogue, Collaboration, Learning, and Decision-Making in Global Environmental Governance: The Case of the IUCN Intergenerational Partnership for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Bliss, Sam & Egler, Megan, 2020. "Ecological Economics Beyond Markets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    10. Sattler, Claudia & Loft, Lasse & Mann, Carsten & Meyer, Claas, 2018. "Methods in ecosystem services governance analysis: An introduction," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PB), pages 155-168.
    11. Chien, Herlin & Saito, Osamu, 2021. "Evaluating social–ecological fit in urban stream management: The role of governing institutions in sustainable urban ecosystem service provision," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    12. Ullah, Ayat & Zeb, Alam & Saqib, Shahab E. & Kächele, Harald, 2022. "Landscape co-management and livelihood sustainability: Lessons learned from the billion trees afforestation project in Pakistan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    13. Rodriguez, Maykol & Bodini, Antonio & Escobedo, Francisco J. & Clerici, Nicola, 2021. "Analyzing socio-ecological interactions through qualitative modeling: Forest conservation and implications for sustainability in the peri‑urban bogota (Colombia)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 439(C).
    14. Eliana Martinez & Lizeth Tatiana Luna-Mancilla & Housseman Steven Ramos-Zambrano & Ulianova Vidal-Gomez, 2022. "Potato Farming Systems from a Social-Ecological Perspective: Identifying Key Points to Increase Resilience in a High Andean Productive Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Isabel Bueno & Ana Isabel Moreno-Calles & Juliana Merçon, 2023. "Yeknemilis: Social Learning and Intercultural Transdisciplinary Collaboration for Sustainable Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-26, June.
    16. Marjan Kamyabi & Habib Alipour, 2022. "An Investigation of the Challenges Faced by the Disabled Population and the Implications for Accessible Tourism: Evidence from a Mediterranean Destination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Musson, Anne, 2012. "The build-up of local sustainable development politics: A case study of company leaders in France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 75-87.
    18. Mohammad Mojibul Hoque Mozumder & Md. Abdul Wahab & Simo Sarkki & Petra Schneider & Mohammad Mahmudul Islam, 2018. "Enhancing Social Resilience of the Coastal Fishing Communities: A Case Study of Hilsa ( Tenualosa Ilisha H.) Fishery in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, September.
    19. Michael Schoon & Michael E. Cox, 2018. "Collaboration, Adaptation, and Scaling: Perspectives on Environmental Governance for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-9, March.
    20. Hao Hong Do & Oliver Frör, 2022. "River Ecosystem Resilience: Applying the Contingent Valuation Method in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:3975-:d:179526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.