IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p4177-d1649757.html

How Bridging Approaches Further Relationships, Governance, and Ecosystem Services Research and Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Kathleen C. Williams

    (Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, USEPA Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MN 55804, USA)

  • Leah M. Sharpe

    (Gulf Ecosystem Measurement and Modeling Division, USEPA Office of Research and Development, Gulf Breeze, FL 32561, USA)

  • Sebastian Paczuski

    (Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Duluth, MN 55804, USA)

  • Keahna Margeson

    (Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Duluth, MN 55804, USA
    School for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
    School of Planning, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada)

  • Matthew C. Harwell

    (Pacific Ecological Systems Division, USEPA Office of Research and Development, Newport, OR 97365, USA)

Abstract

Understanding environmental governance empowers researchers and practitioners alike to work towards solutions that improve both environmental and human well-being outcomes. Collaborative, iterative approaches to governance use bridging approaches such as translational ecology, boundary work, and ecosystem services. The US Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Research and Development worked with a variety of collaborators to implement six multi-year coordinated case study research projects. The research projects were designed to support agency collaborators spanning different geographies, ecosystems, and environmental management decision contexts, and to demonstrate that different tools, approaches, and ecosystem service foci can enhance coastal and other water resource sustainability. To better understand the iterative and collaborative nature of the cases and collaborations, researchers conducted an analysis of the comparative case studies based on Williams’ (2018) and Ostrom’s (1994, 2009) frameworks. The team identified (1) who participated in the processes; (2) what the programs and goals were; (3) where programs worked and their resources; and (4) the resulting outcomes. We demonstrate that stakeholder participation and outcomes look different within different projects, and we conclude that relationships, focus on place, and common goals produce the most impactful results.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathleen C. Williams & Leah M. Sharpe & Sebastian Paczuski & Keahna Margeson & Matthew C. Harwell, 2025. "How Bridging Approaches Further Relationships, Governance, and Ecosystem Services Research and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4177-:d:1649757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4177/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4177/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2009. "The Management and Sustainability of Government Debt," Chapters, in: The Public Sector in Japan, chapter 9, pages 239-272, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. McNie, Elizabeth C. & Parris, Adam & Sarewitz, Daniel, 2016. "Improving the public value of science: A typology to inform discussion, design and implementation of research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 884-895.
    3. ., 2003. "Coordination routines: governance," Chapters, in: Economic Institutions and Complexity, chapter 5, pages 70-81, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Alan Greenspan, 2002. "Corporate governance," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 3(03), pages 3-6, October.
    5. ., 2003. "System patterns: dominant governmental direction," Chapters, in: Economic Institutions and Complexity, chapter 7, pages 97-118, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Fikret Berkes, 2017. "Environmental Governance for the Anthropocene? Social-Ecological Systems, Resilience, and Collaborative Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-12, July.
    7. Alice Cohen, 2012. "Rescaling Environmental Governance: Watersheds as Boundary Objects at the Intersection of Science, Neoliberalism, and Participation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(9), pages 2207-2224, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wiwandari Handayani & S. P. Dewi & Bintang Septiarani, 2023. "Toward adaptive water governance: An examination on stakeholders engagement and interactions in Semarang City, Indonesia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1914-1943, February.
    2. Kenji Otsuka, 2022. "Co‐optation in co‐production: Maintaining credibility and legitimacy in transboundary environmental governance in East Asia," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(6), pages 771-797, November.
    3. Dhiyathad Prateeppornnarong, 2020. "Towards sustainable integration: The role of government in facilitating ASEAN integration through education cooperation," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 23(4), pages 352-364, December.
    4. Madeleine Pill & Jason Slade, 2025. "Co-governance of the ‘creative city’: Bringing lived experience to the governance of culture in Sheffield," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(14), pages 2842-2858, November.
    5. Azmaine FAEIQUE & Nahin Rahman SAMI & Most. Suraia Akter SHIKHA & Md Asfak Mahbub SAJJAD & Md Tazrian Hassan RAMIM & Sheikh Jannatunnessa SHRABONI, 2025. "Evaluating the Reform Proposals of Police Reform Commission 2024: A Step Towards Accountable Policing in Dhaka, Bangladesh," APPLIED RESEARCH IN ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 6(3), pages 30-45, December.
    6. Ruskova Svilena & Spasova Dima & Kunev Svilen & Bratoeva Evgeniya, 2025. "Co-management – A Tool for Enhancing Satisfaction of Stakeholders in the Social Ecosystem," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 3780-3791.
    7. Farhad, Sherman & Baird, Julia & Hickey, Gordon & Holzer, Jennifer M. & Winkler, Klara Johanna & Ruiz-Ballesteros, Esteban, 2025. "Ecosystem services governance: A cross-realm lever for sustainability transformation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. Glückler, Johannes & Gutiérrez, Denise, 2025. "Social license to operate: an institutional critique and research framework," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    9. Michael Eduful, 2024. "Toward good governance in water resources management in Ghana," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(2), pages 485-507, May.
    10. Didier Wernli & Lucas Böttcher & Flore Vanackere & Yuliya Kaspiarovich & Maria Masood & Nicolas Levrat, 2023. "Understanding and governing global systemic crises in the 21st century: A complexity perspective," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(2), pages 207-228, May.
    11. Tony Kinder & Jari Stenvall & Antti Talonen, 2023. "Logics and Agency in Public Management Research," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 159-180, March.
    12. Marta Chodyka & Sylwia Wojciechowska-Filipek & Zbigniew Ciekanowski & Aneta Chrzaszcz & Slawomir Żurawski, 2026. "The Effectiveness of Security Management Systems in Public Organizations: A Cybersecurity Perspective," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 478-489.
    13. KOUAKOU, Thiédjé Gaudens-Omer, 2025. "Volatilité et régulation des cryptomonnaies : approche monétaire orthodoxe versus approche monétaire hétérodoxe [Volatility and regulation of cryptocurrencies: orthodox monetary approach versus heterodox monetary approach]," MPRA Paper 123774, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Hanna Salmenperä, 2023. "Governing the Transition to Circularity of Textiles – Finnish Companies’ Expectations of Interventions for Change," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 1747-1767, December.
    15. Kinder Sebastian & Lis Kamil & Peiker Wolfdietrich & Suwala Lech, 2014. "The Challenging Task of Governing Cross-Border Investment in Peripheral Regions: Polish Investors in Northeast Germany," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 33(4), pages 27-41.
    16. D. Diakité & A. Royer & D. Rousselière & L.D. Tamini, 2022. "Formal and informal governance mechanisms of machinery cooperatives: The case of Quebec," Post-Print hal-03833870, HAL.
    17. Ulbricht, Lena & Yeung, Karen, 2022. "Algorithmic regulation: A maturing concept for investigating regulation of and through algorithms," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 16(1), pages 3-22.
    18. Krzysztof Niedziałkowski & Renata Putkowska-Smoter, 2021. "What Is the Role of the Government in Wildlife Policy? Evolutionary Governance Perspective," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 428-438.
    19. Jacob Torfing & Christopher Ansell & Eva Sørensen, 2024. "Metagoverning the Co-Creation of Green Transitions: A Socio-Political Contingency Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    20. G. Moreno, Frede & Brique, John Michael, 2024. "An Analytical Assessment of Policy and Regulatory Frameworks for Green and Digital Transitions in Zamboanga City, Philippines," MPRA Paper 122663, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4177-:d:1649757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.