IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v30y2019i2d10.1007_s10845-018-1427-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The development of an ontology for describing the capabilities of manufacturing resources

Author

Listed:
  • Eeva Järvenpää

    (Tampere University of Technology)

  • Niko Siltala

    (Tampere University of Technology)

  • Otto Hylli

    (Tampere University of Technology)

  • Minna Lanz

    (Tampere University of Technology)

Abstract

Today’s highly volatile production environments call for adaptive and rapidly responding production systems that can adjust to the required changes in processing functions, production capacity and dispatching of orders. There is a desire to support such system adaptation and reconfiguration with computer-aided decision support systems. In order to bring automation to reconfiguration decision making in a multi-vendor resource environment, a common formal resource model, representing the functionalities and constraints of the resources, is required. This paper presents the systematic development process of an OWL-based manufacturing resource capability ontology (MaRCO), which has been developed to describe the capabilities of manufacturing resources. As opposed to other existing resource description models, MaRCO supports the representation and automatic inference of combined capabilities from the representation of the simple capabilities of co-operating resources. Resource vendors may utilize MaRCO to describe the functionality of their offerings in a comparable manner, while the system integrators and end users may use these descriptions for the fast identification of candidate resources and resource combinations for a specific production need. This article presents the step-by-step development process of the ontology by following the five phases of the ontology engineering methodology: feasibility study, kickoff, refinement, evaluation, and usage and evolution. Furthermore, it provides details of the model’s content and structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Eeva Järvenpää & Niko Siltala & Otto Hylli & Minna Lanz, 2019. "The development of an ontology for describing the capabilities of manufacturing resources," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 959-978, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:30:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10845-018-1427-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-018-1427-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-018-1427-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-018-1427-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicola Guarino & Christopher A. Welty, 2009. "An Overview of OntoClean," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Steffen Staab & Rudi Studer (ed.), Handbook on Ontologies, pages 201-220, Springer.
    2. J. Backhaus & G. Reinhart, 2017. "Digital description of products, processes and resources for task-oriented programming of assembly systems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(8), pages 1787-1800, December.
    3. York Sure & Steffen Staab & Rudi Studer, 2009. "Ontology Engineering Methodology," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Steffen Staab & Rudi Studer (ed.), Handbook on Ontologies, pages 135-152, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amon Göppert & Lea Grahn & Jonas Rachner & Dennis Grunert & Simon Hort & Robert H. Schmitt, 2023. "Pipeline for ontology-based modeling and automated deployment of digital twins for planning and control of manufacturing systems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 2133-2152, June.
    2. Russell Tatenda Munodawafa & Satirenjit Kaur Johl, 2019. "Big Data Analytics Capabilities and Eco-Innovation: A Study of Energy Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Chenxi Yuan & Guoyan Li & Sagar Kamarthi & Xiaoning Jin & Mohsen Moghaddam, 2022. "Trends in intelligent manufacturing research: a keyword co-occurrence network based review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 425-439, February.
    4. Xiaochen Zheng & Xiaodu Hu & Rebeca Arista & Jinzhi Lu & Jyri Sorvari & Joachim Lentes & Fernando Ubis & Dimitris Kiritsis, 2024. "A semantic-driven tradespace framework to accelerate aircraft manufacturing system design," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 175-198, January.
    5. Hien Nguyen Ngoc & Ganix Lasa & Ion Iriarte, 2022. "Human-centred design in industry 4.0: case study review and opportunities for future research," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 35-76, January.
    6. Colin Reiff & Matthias Buser & Thomas Betten & Volkher Onuseit & Max Hoßfeld & Daniel Wehner & Oliver Riedel, 2021. "A Process-Planning Framework for Sustainable Manufacturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karamollah Bagherifard & Mohsen Rahmani & Vahid Rafe & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi, 2018. "A Recommendation Method Based on Semantic Similarity and Complementarity Using Weighted Taxonomy: A Case on Construction Materials Dataset," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Federica Costa & Alberto Portioli-Staudacher, 2021. "Labor flexibility integration in workload control in Industry 4.0 era," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 420-433, December.
    3. Qing Yang & Chen Zuo & Xingxing Liu & Zhichao Yang & Hui Zhou, 2020. "Risk Response for Municipal Solid Waste Crisis Using Ontology-Based Reasoning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Birger Lantow & Kurt Sandkuhl, 2015. "An Analysis of Applicability using Quality Metrics for Ontologies on Ontology Design Patterns," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(1), pages 81-99, January.
    5. Kung-Jeng Wang & Diwanda Ageng Rizqi & Hong-Phuc Nguyen, 2021. "Skill transfer support model based on deep learning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1129-1146, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:30:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10845-018-1427-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.