IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i2p677-d479141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Demographic Changes on CO 2 Emission Profiles: Cases of East Asian Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Tae Yong Jung

    (Graduate School of International Studies, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea)

  • Yong-Gun Kim

    (Korea Environment Institute, Sejong 30147, Korea)

  • Jongwoo Moon

    (Graduate School of International Studies, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea)

Abstract

The demographic changes of East Asian countries have accelerated in recent years. With consideration of the linkage between human behavior and carbon emissions, it is necessary to consider demographic characteristics for the CO 2 emission projections of these countries. This study examines how changes in the demographic structure affect the emission projections of three East Asian countries (South Korea, China, and Japan) by comparing two different vintages of population projections. The study constructed a dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model and applied the most up-to-date dataset of population prospects, GTAP 10, and the labor force participation rate. By comparing UN2010 and UN2019 projections, the study examined the impact of demographic changes on CO 2 emission profiles of the three East Asian countries. The simulation result showed that GDP, which represents economic activity along with the population, is the direct channel of CO 2 emission projections. Moreover, the scenario analysis suggested the population factor as one of the main drivers of the CO 2 emission projection and a clear positive relationship between GDP and CO 2 emissions, though CO 2 emissions are generally inelastic in response to a GDP decrease in the three East Asian countries. The finding indirectly implies that not only the size of the population but also demographic composition should be considered to project CO 2 emissions, as the labor participation rate is an important factor to determine the production function.

Suggested Citation

  • Tae Yong Jung & Yong-Gun Kim & Jongwoo Moon, 2021. "The Impact of Demographic Changes on CO 2 Emission Profiles: Cases of East Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:677-:d:479141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/677/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/677/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taesik Yun & Gyeong Lyeob Cho & Jang-Yeop Kim, 2016. "Analyzing Economic Effects with Energy Mix Changes: A Hybrid CGE Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Burfisher,Mary E., 2017. "Introduction to Computable General Equilibrium Models," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107584686, June.
    3. Terciane Sabadini Carvalho & Flaviane Souza Santiago & Fernando Salgueiro Perobelli, 2021. "Demographic change in Brazil and its impacts on CO2 emissions," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 197-213, April.
    4. Wei, Taoyuan & Zhu, Qin & Glomsrød, Solveig, 2018. "How Will Demographic Characteristics of the Labor Force Matter for the Global Economy and Carbon Dioxide Emissions?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 197-207.
    5. Biying Yu & Yi-Ming Wei & Kei Gomi & Yuzuru Matsuoka, 2018. "Future scenarios for energy consumption and carbon emissions due to demographic transitions in Chinese households," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(2), pages 109-118, February.
    6. Dai, Hancheng & Masui, Toshihiko & Matsuoka, Yuzuru & Fujimori, Shinichiro, 2012. "The impacts of China’s household consumption expenditure patterns on energy demand and carbon emissions towards 2050," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 736-750.
    7. Junfeng Wang & Yaqing Wu & Yue Zhao & Shutong He & Zhanfeng Dong & Wenguang Bo, 2019. "The population structural transition effect on rising per capita CO2 emissions: evidence from China," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(10), pages 1250-1269, November.
    8. Okada, Akira, 2012. "Is an increased elderly population related to decreased CO2 emissions from road transportation?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 286-292.
    9. Taoyuan Wei & Qin Zhu & Solveig Glomsrød, 2018. "Ageing Impact on the Economy and Emissions in China: A Global Computable General Equilibrium Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, April.
    10. Balezentis, Tomas, 2020. "Shrinking ageing population and other drivers of energy consumption and CO2 emission in the residential sector: A case from Eastern Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    11. Burfisher,Mary E., 2017. "Introduction to Computable General Equilibrium Models," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107132207, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhenkai Yang & Mei-Chih Wang & Tsangyao Chang & Wing-Keung Wong & Fangjhy Li, 2022. "Which Factors Determine CO 2 Emissions in China? Trade Openness, Financial Development, Coal Consumption, Economic Growth or Urbanization: Quantile Granger Causality Test," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Partnership for Market Readiness, 2021. "Beyond Mitigation," World Bank Publications - Reports 35624, The World Bank Group.
    2. Shi, Zhengyu & Wu, Libo & Zhou, Yang, 2023. "Predicting household energy consumption in an aging society," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    3. Marcus Roller, 2023. "Estimation of direct net effects of events," Tourism Economics, , vol. 29(6), pages 1577-1597, September.
    4. Lukman OYELAMI & Amara ZONGO, 2022. "Modeling the Impact of Non-Tariff Barriers in Services on Intra-African Trade: Global Trade Analysis Project Model," Bordeaux Economics Working Papers 2022-08, Bordeaux School of Economics (BSE).
    5. Diamantis Koutsandreas & Evangelos Spiliotis & Haris Doukas & John Psarras, 2021. "What Is the Macroeconomic Impact of Higher Decarbonization Speeds? The Case of Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Yu, Yan-Yan & Liang, Qiao-mei & Liu, Li-Jing, 2023. "Impact of population ageing on carbon emissions: A case of China's urban households," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 86-100.
    7. B. Lahcen & J. Brusselaers & K. Vrancken & Y. Dams & C. Silva Paes & J. Eyckmans & S. Rousseau, 2020. "Green Recovery Policies for the COVID-19 Crisis: Modelling the Impact on the Economy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 731-750, August.
    8. Zhou, Yang & Wang, Heng & Qiu, Huanguang, 2023. "Population aging reduces carbon emissions: Evidence from China's latest three censuses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    9. Verma, Pramit & Kumari, Tanu & Raghubanshi, Akhilesh Singh, 2021. "Energy emissions, consumption and impact of urban households: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    10. Bekkers, Eddy & Orlov, Daniil, 2020. "The impact of macroeconomic closures on long run trade projections and trade policy experiments," Conference papers 333154, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    11. Knobel, Alexander (Кнобель, Александр) & Sedalishchev, Vladimir (Седалищев, Владимир), 2017. "Risks and Benefits for EAEU from Various Integration Scenarios in Asia-Pacific Region [Риски И Выгоды Для Еаэс От Различных Сценариев Интеграции В Азиатско-Тихоокеанском Регионе]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 2, pages 72-85, April.
    12. Peter B. Dixon & Maureen T. Rimmer & Daniel Mason-D'Croz, 2020. "Computable general equilibrium simulations of the effects on the U.S. economy of reductions in beef consumption," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-311, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    13. Martin Stepanek, 2022. "Sectoral Impacts of International Labour Migration and Population Ageing in the Czech Republic," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(2), pages 375-400, August.
    14. Agyeman, Domena A. & Ochuodho, Thomas O., 2021. "Factor endowment and structural change in Kentucky forest industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    15. Latorre, María C. & Yonezawa, Hidemichi, 2018. "Stopped TTIP? Its potential impact on the world and the role of neglected FDI," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 99-120.
    16. M. Yu. Ksenofontov & A. A. Shirov & D. A. Polzikov & A. A. Yantovskii, 2018. "Assessing Multiplier Effects in the Russian Economy: Input-Output Approach," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 109-115, March.
    17. Kuşkaya, Sevda, 2022. "Residential solar energy consumption and greenhouse gas nexus: Evidence from Morlet wavelet transforms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 793-804.
    18. Yang Zhan & Chuangyin Dang, 2018. "A smooth path-following algorithm for market equilibrium under a class of piecewise-smooth concave utilities," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 381-402, November.
    19. Fahad Fahimullah & Yi Geng & Bradley Hardy & Daniel Muhammad & Jeffrey Wilkins, 2019. "Earnings, EITC, and Employment Responses to a $15 Minimum Wage: Will Low-Income Workers Be Better Off?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 33(4), pages 331-350, November.
    20. Sergey Nikolaevich Silvestrov & Sergey Alekseevich Pobyvaev & Stanislav Borisovich Reshetnikov & Dmitrii Vladimirovich Firsov, 2022. "Management of the Russian Interregional Investment Distribution Using the Autonomous Expenditure Multiplier Model," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:677-:d:479141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.