IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i10p5650-d557016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability and Resilience Revisited: Impact of Information Technology Disruptions on Empirical Retail Logistics Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Klumpp

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Material Flow and Logistics IML, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
    Institute for Logistics and Service Management, FOM University of Applied Sciences, 45130 Essen, Germany
    Department of Business Administration, University of Göttingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Dominic Loske

    (Institute for Logistics and Service Management, FOM University of Applied Sciences, 45130 Essen, Germany
    Faculty of Business and Law, UCAM Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, 30107 Guadalupe, Spain)

Abstract

The increasing use of information technology (IT) in supply chain management and logistics is connected to corporate advantages and enhanced competitiveness provided by enterprise resource planning systems and warehouse management systems. One downside of advancing digitalization is an increasing dependence on IT systems and the negative effects of technology disruption impacts on firm performance, measured by logistics efficiency, e.g., with data envelopment analysis (DEA). While the traditional DEA model cannot deconstruct production processes to find the underlying causes of inefficiencies, network DEA (NDEA) can provide insights into resource allocation at the individual stages of operations. We apply an NDEA approach to measure the impact of IT disruptions on the efficiency of operational processes in retail logistics. We compare efficiency levels during IT disruptions, as well as ripple effects throughout subsequent days. In the first stage, we evaluate the efficiency of order picking in retail logistics. After handing over the transport units to the outgoing goods department of a warehouse, we assess the subsequent process of truck loading as a second stage. The obtained results underline the analytical power of NDEA models and demonstrate that the proposed model can evaluate IT disruptions in supply chains better than traditional approaches. Insights show that efficiency reductions after IT disruptions occur at different levels and for diverse reasons, and successful preparation and contingency management can support improvements.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias Klumpp & Dominic Loske, 2021. "Sustainability and Resilience Revisited: Impact of Information Technology Disruptions on Empirical Retail Logistics Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5650-:d:557016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5650/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5650/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William W. Cooper & Lawrence M. Seiford & Joe Zhu (ed.), 2011. "Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-1-4419-6151-8, September.
    2. Fare, Rolf & Grosskopf, Shawna, 1996. "Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 65-70, January.
    3. Per Andersen & Niels Christian Petersen, 1993. "A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(10), pages 1261-1264, October.
    4. Halkos, George Emm. & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2009. "Exploring the existence of Kuznets curve in countries' environmental efficiency using DEA window analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 2168-2176, May.
    5. Antonio Miceli & Birgit Hagen & Maria Pia Riccardi & Francesco Sotti & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2021. "Thriving, Not Just Surviving in Changing Times: How Sustainability, Agility and Digitalization Intertwine with Organizational Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Banker, Rajiv D., 1984. "Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 35-44, July.
    7. Kondo, Ayako, 2018. "The effects of supply chain disruptions caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake on workers," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 40-50.
    8. Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Emrouznejad, Ali & Tavana, Madjid, 2011. "A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: Two decades in the making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 457-472, November.
    9. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui, 2019. "Low-Certainty-Need (LCN) supply chains: a new perspective in managing disruption risks and resilience," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15-16), pages 5119-5136, August.
    10. Tadeusz Sawik, 2017. "A portfolio approach to supply chain disruption management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(7), pages 1970-1991, April.
    11. Dixit, Vijaya & Verma, Priyanka & Tiwari, Manoj Kumar, 2020. "Assessment of pre and post-disaster supply chain resilience based on network structural parameters with CVaR as a risk measure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    12. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    13. Ming Liu & Zhongzheng Liu & Feng Chu & Feifeng Zheng & Chengbin Chu, 2021. "A new robust dynamic Bayesian network approach for disruption risk assessment under the supply chain ripple effect," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 265-285, January.
    14. Idiano D’Adamo & Paolo Rosa, 2020. "How Do You See Infrastructure? Green Energy to Provide Economic Growth after COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-3, June.
    15. William W. Cooper & Lawrence M. Seiford & Joe Zhu, 2011. "Data Envelopment Analysis: History, Models, and Interpretations," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: William W. Cooper & Lawrence M. Seiford & Joe Zhu (ed.), Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, chapter 0, pages 1-39, Springer.
    16. Jihee Han & KwangSup Shin, 2016. "Evaluation mechanism for structural robustness of supply chain considering disruption propagation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 135-151, January.
    17. Chen, Liwei & Dui, Hongyan & Zhang, Chi, 2020. "A resilience measure for supply chain systems considering the interruption with the cyber-physical systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    18. Chien Wang & Ram Gopal & Stanley Zionts, 1997. "Use of Data Envelopment Analysis in assessing Information Technology impact on firm performance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 73(0), pages 191-213, October.
    19. Hamed Jahani & Babak Abbasi & Zahra Hosseinifard & Masih Fadaki & James P. Minas, 2021. "Disruption risk management in service-level agreements," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 226-244, January.
    20. Rajiv D. Banker & William W. Cooper & Lawrence M. Seiford & Joe Zhu, 2011. "Returns to Scale in DEA," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: William W. Cooper & Lawrence M. Seiford & Joe Zhu (ed.), Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, chapter 0, pages 41-70, Springer.
    21. AGRELL, Per J. & HATAMI-MARBINI, Adel, 2013. "Frontier-based performance analysis models for supply chain management: state of the art and research directions," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2555, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    22. Tulika Chakraborty & Satyaveer S. Chauhan & Mustapha Ouhimmou, 2020. "Mitigating supply disruption with a backup supplier under uncertain demand: competition vs. cooperation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(12), pages 3618-3649, June.
    23. Yu, Wantao & Jacobs, Mark A. & Chavez, Roberto & Yang, Jiehui, 2019. "Dynamism, disruption orientation, and resilience in the supply chain and the impacts on financial performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 352-362.
    24. Wade Cook & Moez Hababou & Hans Tuenter, 2000. "Multicomponent Efficiency Measurement and Shared Inputs in Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application to Sales and Service Performance in Bank Branches," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 209-224, November.
    25. Tadeusz Sawik, 2019. "Two-period vs. multi-period model for supply chain disruption management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(14), pages 4502-4518, July.
    26. Lohmer, Jacob & Bugert, Niels & Lasch, Rainer, 2020. "Analysis of resilience strategies and ripple effect in blockchain-coordinated supply chains: An agent-based simulation study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    27. Maria Pires & Ana Camanho & Pedro Amorim, 2020. "Solving the grocery backroom sizing problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(18), pages 5707-5720, September.
    28. Lawrence M. Seiford & Joe Zhu, 1999. "Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(9), pages 1270-1288, September.
    29. Yongbo Li & Amir-Reza Abtahi & Mahya Seyedan, 2019. "Supply chain performance evaluation using fuzzy network data envelopment analysis: a case study in automotive industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(2), pages 461-484, April.
    30. Dormady, Noah & Roa-Henriquez, Alfredo & Rose, Adam, 2019. "Economic resilience of the firm: A production theory approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 446-460.
    31. Li, Yuhong & Zobel, Christopher W. & Seref, Onur & Chatfield, Dean, 2020. "Network characteristics and supply chain resilience under conditions of risk propagation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    32. Armin Jabbarzadeh & Behnam Fahimnia & Fatemeh Sabouhi, 2018. "Resilient and sustainable supply chain design: sustainability analysis under disruption risks," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(17), pages 5945-5968, September.
    33. Fartaj, Seyedamir-Reza & Kabir, Golam & Eghujovbo, Victor & Ali, Syed Mithun & Paul, Sanjoy Kumar, 2020. "Modeling transportation disruptions in the supply chain of automotive parts manufacturing company," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    34. Alikhani, Reza & Torabi, S.Ali & Altay, Nezih, 2021. "Retail supply chain network design with concurrent resilience capabilities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    35. Mattia Ferrari, 2020. "Reflexive Governance for Infrastructure Resilience and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-8, December.
    36. Morita, Hiroshi & Hirokawa, Koichiro & Zhu, Joe, 2005. "A slack-based measure of efficiency in context-dependent data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 357-362, August.
    37. Nguyen, Huy & Sharkey, Thomas C. & Wheeler, Shamus & Mitchell, John E. & Wallace, Willam A., 2021. "Towards the development of quantitative resilience indices for Multi-Echelon Assembly Supply Chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    38. Goldbeck, Nils & Angeloudis, Panagiotis & Ochieng, Washington, 2020. "Optimal supply chain resilience with consideration of failure propagation and repair logistics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    39. Reza Alikhani & S.Ali Torabi & Nezih Altay, 2021. "Retail supply chain network design with concurrent resilience capabilities," Post-Print hal-03539192, HAL.
    40. George A. Zsidisin & Boyana N. Petkova & Lammertjan Dam, 2016. "Examining the influence of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth: does the reason matter?," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 69-82, January.
    41. Matthias Klumpp, 2017. "Do Forwarders Improve Sustainability Efficiency? Evidence from a European DEA Malmquist Index Calculation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-33, May.
    42. Jighyasu Gaur & Mehdi Amini & Arza Keshava Rao, 2020. "The impact of supply chain disruption on the closed-loop supply chain configuration profit: a study of sourcing policies," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(17), pages 5380-5400, September.
    43. John R. Macdonald & Christopher W. Zobel & Steven A. Melnyk & Stanley E. Griffis, 2018. "Supply chain risk and resilience: theory building through structured experiments and simulation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(12), pages 4337-4355, June.
    44. Bazan, Ehab & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Zanoni, Simone & Zavanella, Lucio E., 2014. "Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) with Consignment Stock (CS) agreement for a two-level supply chain with an imperfect production process with/without restoration interruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 289-301.
    45. Rolf Färe & Gerald Whittaker, 1995. "An Intermediate Input Model Of Dairy Production Using Complex Survey Data," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 201-213, May.
    46. Belhadi, Amine & Kamble, Sachin & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Ndubisi, Nelson Oly & Venkatesh, Mani, 2021. "Manufacturing and service supply chain resilience to the COVID-19 outbreak: Lessons learned from the automobile and airline industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    47. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Per J. Agrell & Hirofumi Fukuyama & Kobra Gholami & Pegah Khoshnevis, 2017. "The role of multiplier bounds in fuzzy data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 250(1), pages 249-276, March.
    48. Aldrighetti, Riccardo & Battini, Daria & Ivanov, Dmitry & Zennaro, Ilenia, 2021. "Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: A review and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    49. Wong, Christina W.Y. & Lirn, Taih-Cherng & Yang, Ching-Chiao & Shang, Kuo-Chung, 2020. "Supply chain and external conditions under which supply chain resilience pays: An organizational information processing theorization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    50. Edward H. Kaplan, 2020. "Containing 2019-nCoV (Wuhan) coronavirus," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 311-314, September.
    51. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    52. Peter Ralston & Jennifer Blackhurst, 2020. "Industry 4.0 and resilience in the supply chain: a driver of capability enhancement or capability loss?," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(16), pages 5006-5019, July.
    53. Brewton, Katherine E. & Danes, Sharon M. & Stafford, Kathryn & Haynes, George W., 2010. "Determinants of rural and urban family firm resilience," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 155-166, September.
    54. Behzadi, Golnar & O’Sullivan, Michael Justin & Olsen, Tava Lennon, 2020. "On metrics for supply chain resilience," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 145-158.
    55. William W. Cooper & Lawrence M. Seiford & Kaoru Tone, 2007. "Data Envelopment Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-45283-8, December.
    56. Gu, Minhao & Yang, Lu & Huo, Baofeng, 2021. "The impact of information technology usage on supply chain resilience and performance: An ambidexterous view," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Costa Melo, Isotilia & Alves Junior, Paulo Nocera & Callefi, Jéssica Syrio & da Silva, Karoline Arguelho & Nagano, Marcelo Seido & Rebelatto, Daisy Aparecida do Nascimento & Rentizelas, Athanasios, 2023. "Measuring the performance of retailers during the COVID-19 pandemic: Embedding optimal control theory principles in a dynamic data envelopment analysis approach," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 10(C).
    2. Veslav Kuranovič & Edgar Sokolovskij & Darius Bazaras & Aldona Jarašūnienė & Kristina Čižiūnienė, 2023. "Estimating the Intensity of Cargo Flows in Warehouses by Applying Guanxi Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, November.
    3. João M. Lopes & Sofia Gomes & Lassana Mané, 2022. "Developing Knowledge of Supply Chain Resilience in Less-Developed Countries in the Pandemic Age," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Marvello Yang & Norizan Jaafar & Abdullah Al Mamun & Anas A. Salameh & Noorshella Che Nawi, 2022. "Modelling the significance of strategic orientation for competitive advantage and economic sustainability: the use of hybrid SEM–neural network analysis," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, December.
    5. Hongyi Mao & Tao Zhang & Qing Tang, 2021. "Research Framework for Determining How Artificial Intelligence Enables Information Technology Service Management for Business Model Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Changrong Dong & Gongmin Zhao & Yuanhao Wang & Yongjie Wu & Haimeng Liang, 2023. "Evaluation of Logistics-Industry Efficiency and Enhancement Path in China’s Yellow River Basin under Dual Carbon Targets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Veronika Bikse & Inese Lusena-Ezera & Peteris Rivza & Baiba Rivza, 2021. "The Development of Digital Transformation and Relevant Competencies for Employees in the Context of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Latvia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Daria Minashkina & Ari Happonen, 2023. "Warehouse Management Systems for Social and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-33, July.
    9. Koreis, Jonas & Loske, Dominik & Schmidt, Joachim & Klumpp, Matthias, 2021. "Disruptions and exception handling in food supply chains," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. & Blecker, Thorsten (ed.), Adapting to the Future: How Digitalization Shapes Sustainable Logistics and Resilient Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg Internationa, volume 31, pages 919-941, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    10. Ruiyu Sun & Siyao Zhang & Tianyu Wang & Jiarui Hu & Junhu Ruan & Junyong Ruan, 2021. "Willingness and Influencing Factors of Pig Farmers to Adopt Internet of Things Technology in Food Traceability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manupati, V.K. & Schoenherr, Tobias & Ramkumar, M. & Panigrahi, Suraj & Sharma, Yash & Mishra, Prakriti, 2022. "Recovery strategies for a disrupted supply chain network: Leveraging blockchain technology in pre- and post-disruption scenarios," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    2. Zhao, Nanyang & Hong, Jiangtao & Lau, Kwok Hung, 2023. "Impact of supply chain digitalization on supply chain resilience and performance: A multi-mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    3. Kao, Chiang, 2014. "Network data envelopment analysis: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 1-16.
    4. Loske, Dominic & Klumpp, Matthias, 2021. "Human-AI collaboration in route planning: An empirical efficiency-based analysis in retail logistics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    5. AGRELL, Per & HATAMI-MARBINI, Adel, 2011. "Frontier-based performance analysis models for supply chain management; state of the art and research directions," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2011069, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. Iftikhar, Anas & Purvis, Laura & Giannoccaro, Ilaria, 2021. "A meta-analytical review of antecedents and outcomes of firm resilience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 408-425.
    7. Victor V. Podinovski & Robert G. Chambers & Kazim Baris Atici & Iryna D. Deineko, 2016. "Marginal Values and Returns to Scale for Nonparametric Production Frontiers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 236-250, February.
    8. Fazlollahi, Ariyan & Franke, Ulrik, 2018. "Measuring the impact of enterprise integration on firm performance using data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 119-129.
    9. Cook, Wade D. & Liang, Liang & Zhu, Joe, 2010. "Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 423-430, December.
    10. Cook, Wade D. & Seiford, Larry M., 2009. "Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Chen, Yao & Du, Juan & David Sherman, H. & Zhu, Joe, 2010. "DEA model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 339-349, November.
    12. Lorenzo Castelli & Raffaele Pesenti & Walter Ukovich, 2010. "A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the Decision Making Units is considered," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 207-235, January.
    13. Chih-Cheng Chen, 2015. "Assessing the Activeness of Online Economic Activity of Taiwan’s Internet Users: An Application of the Super-Efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis Model," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(2), pages 433-451, June.
    14. Pejman Peykani & Jafar Gheidar-Kheljani & Reza Farzipoor Saen & Emran Mohammadi, 2022. "Generalized robust window data envelopment analysis approach for dynamic performance measurement under uncertain panel data," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5529-5567, November.
    15. Sotiros, Dimitris & Koronakos, Gregory & Despotis, Dimitris K., 2019. "Dominance at the divisional efficiencies level in network DEA: The case of two-stage processes," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 144-155.
    16. You, Yan Q. & Jie, Tao, 2016. "A study of the operation efficiency and cost performance indices of power-supply companies in China based on a dynamic network slacks-based measure model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 85-97.
    17. Dariush Akbarian, 2021. "Network DEA based on DEA-ratio," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26, December.
    18. Yande Gong & Joe Zhu & Ya Chen & Wade D. Cook, 2018. "DEA as a tool for auditing: application to Chinese manufacturing industry with parallel network structures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 263(1), pages 247-269, April.
    19. Duk Hee Lee & Il Won Seo & Ho Chull Choe & Hee Dae Kim, 2012. "Collaboration network patterns and research performance: the case of Korean public research institutions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(3), pages 925-942, June.
    20. Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1411-1431, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5650-:d:557016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.