IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2020i1p267-d470482.html

Aiming at the Organizational Sustainable Development: Employees’ Pro-Social Rule Breaking as Response to High Performance Expectations

Author

Listed:
  • Fan Wang

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Man Zhang

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
    Party School of Anhui Provincial Committee of C.P.C., Hefei 230022, China)

  • Anupam Kumar Das

    (Department of Management, University of Chittagong, Chattogram 4331, Bangladesh)

  • Haolin Weng

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Peilin Yang

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

Abstract

Despite the continuous increase in empirical research on pro-social rule breaking (PSRB), why organizational members conduct this behavior volitionally still requires further exploration. Drawing on the conservation of resources theory, our study investigated the impact of leaders’ high performance expectations on employees’ PSRB, following a hypothetical model with work stress as the mediator and perceived organizational support as the moderator. A three-waved time-lagged survey covering 208 dyad data of supervisor-subordinate from 41 teams of five enterprises in Shanghai, China, provided support for our hypotheses. After analyzing, we found that high performance expectations increased employees’ work stress, and further influenced employees’ PSRB substantially via stress, where the relationship was moderated by perceived organizational support. The theoretical and practical implications are discussed from a sustainability perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan Wang & Man Zhang & Anupam Kumar Das & Haolin Weng & Peilin Yang, 2020. "Aiming at the Organizational Sustainable Development: Employees’ Pro-Social Rule Breaking as Response to High Performance Expectations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:267-:d:470482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/267/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/267/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Faiza Manzoor & Longbao Wei & Mohammad Nurunnabi & Qazi Abdul Subhan & Syed Irshad Ali Shah & Samaher Fallatah, 2019. "The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Job Performance and CSR as Mediator in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Smith, Ken G. & Locke, Edwin A. & Barry, David, 1990. "Goal setting, planning, and organizational performance: An experimental simulation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 118-134, June.
    3. Yi Li & Nana Li & Mengru Wu & Man Zhang, 2019. "The Sustainability of Motivation Driven by High Performance Expectations: A Self-Defeating Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Jihye Park & Dawoon Jung & Pyoungsoo Lee, 2019. "How to Make a Sustainable Manufacturing Process: A High-Commitment HRM System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Lount, Robert B. & Pettit, Nathan C. & Doyle, Sarah P., 2017. "Motivating underdogs and favorites," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 82-93.
    6. Bandura, Albert, 1991. "Social cognitive theory of self-regulation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 248-287, December.
    7. Jinqiang Zhu & Shiyong Xu & Kan Ouyang & David Herst & Elaine Farndale, 2018. "Ethical leadership and employee pro-social rule-breaking behavior in China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(1), pages 59-81, February.
    8. Yongbo Sun & Xiaojuan Hu & Yixin Ding, 2019. "Learning or Relaxing: How Do Challenge Stressors Stimulate Employee Creativity?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Qian Hongdao & Sughra Bibi & Asif Khan & Lorenzo Ardito & Mohammad Nurunnabi, 2019. "Does What Goes Around Really Comes Around? The Mediating Effect of CSR on the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Employee’s Job Performance in Law Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Merve Gozde Durmaz & Gulten Gumustekin, 2023. "A Study to Determine The Antecedents of The Prosocial Rule Breaking Behaviour: A Qualitative Practice for Hotel Businesses," Istanbul Management Journal, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 0(94), pages 49-64, June.
    2. Naqib Ullah Khan & Peng Zhongyi & Wajid Alim & Heesup Han & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Examining the dynamics of pro-social rule-breaking among grassroots public servants," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi Li & Nana Li & Mengru Wu & Man Zhang, 2019. "The Sustainability of Motivation Driven by High Performance Expectations: A Self-Defeating Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Baron, Robert A. & Mueller, Brandon A. & Wolfe, Marcus T., 2016. "Self-efficacy and entrepreneurs' adoption of unattainable goals: The restraining effects of self-control," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 55-71.
    3. Yi Li & Dacheng Li & Nana Li, 2019. "Sustainable Influence of Manager’s Pro-Social Rule-Breaking Behaviors on Employees’ Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Kanfer, Ruth & Chen, Gilad, 2016. "Motivation in organizational behavior: History, advances and prospects," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 6-19.
    5. Tran Thi Ngoc Lien, 2024. "Stakeholder Perception of Extracurricular Activities at the Tertiary Level in Vietnam," Studies in Educational Management, EUROKD, vol. 15, pages 35-59.
    6. Carlos Bazan, 2022. "Effect of the University’s Environment and Support System on Subjective Social Norms as Precursor of the Entrepreneurial Intention of Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    7. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:5233-5249 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Irene Chu & Mai Chi Vu, 2022. "The Nature of the Self, Self-regulation and Moral Action: Implications from the Confucian Relational Self and Buddhist Non-self," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 245-262, September.
    9. Chen, Xi & Zhang, Stephen X., 2024. "Too much of two good things: The curvilinear effects of self-efficacy and market validation in new ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    10. Xu, Xiaojing & Chen, Chien-fei & Zhu, Xiaojuan & Hu, Qinran, 2018. "Promoting acceptance of direct load control programs in the United States: Financial incentive versus control option," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1278-1287.
    11. Jaeyeob Jeong & Myeonggil Choi, 2017. "The Expected Job Satisfaction Affecting Entrepreneurial Intention as Career Choice in the Cultural and Artistic Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, September.
    12. Shao-Long Li & Fang Sun & Mingze Li, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management Nurtures Change-Oriented Employees: Relationship between High-Commitment Work Systems and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Jay A. Richards & Martin P. Johnson, 2014. "A Case for Theoretical Integration," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, May.
    14. Pedro Marques-Quinteiro & Luís Curral & Ana Passos, 2012. "Adapting The Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire to The Portuguese Context," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 108(3), pages 553-564, September.
    15. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    16. Dinku, Yonatan & Howard-Wagner, Deirdre, 2026. "Seen, heard, inspired: How positive teacher interpersonal style fosters university aspirations in Indigenous students," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    17. Mohammed-Aminu Sanda, 2011. "Managerial Self-efficacy and Discretionary Behavior Improving Work Environment for Small Firm Performance," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 2(6), pages 259-266.
    18. Muhammad Asif & Arif Jameel & Noman Sahito & Jinsoo Hwang & Abid Hussain & Faiza Manzoor, 2019. "Can Leadership Enhance Patient Satisfaction? Assessing the Role of Administrative and Medical Quality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-14, September.
    19. Sabrina Harris & Michael Brooks & Robin Liles & Glacia Ethridge & Quinton Boston & Kacie Blalock, 2019. "Understanding Differences between CORE and CACREP Counselors-in-Training Perceptions of Self-Efficacy," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 40-52, January.
    20. Zhiya Hua & Dandan Ma, 2022. "Depression and Perceived Social Support among Unemployed Youths in China: Investigating the Roles of Emotion-Regulation Difficulties and Self-Efficacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, April.
    21. Sania Khan & Wadi B. Alonazi & Azam Malik & Noor Raihani Zainol, 2023. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Moderate the Nexus of Organizational Culture and Job Satisfaction?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:267-:d:470482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.