IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p4750-d542072.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping Social Impact Assessment Models: A Literature Overview for a Future Research Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Luigi Corvo

    (School of Economics, Department of Management and Law, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via Columbia 2, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Lavinia Pastore

    (School of Economics, Department of Management and Law, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via Columbia 2, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Arianna Manti

    (School of Economics, Department of Management and Law, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via Columbia 2, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Daniel Iannaci

    (Department of Management, University of Turin, Corso Unione Sovietica 218 bis, 10134 Turin, Italy)

Abstract

The social impact assessment (SIA) process is widely utilised and is receiving increasing interest from both scholars and practitioners. A systematic approach was applied in this study to search for articles about SIA models. In the first step, we analysed six main SIA model mappings between 2004 and 2015. In the second step, 98 models were identified. The main findings include the definition of emerging paths for the future research agenda on this topic. Compared with previous SIA mappings, we identified 22 additional models that are related to the sustainability discourse. The meaning of sustainability is defined both by the emergence of new systems in finance that require specific metrics and in relation to the global agenda towards sustainable development. It is interesting to notice how social impact models, sustainability indicators (under the global framework of sustainable development goals (SDGs)) and new financial scores (such as environmental, social and governance (ESGs)) are converging into a common discourse, even if divergence is still present, and further research is needed to unlock the relationships among them.

Suggested Citation

  • Luigi Corvo & Lavinia Pastore & Arianna Manti & Daniel Iannaci, 2021. "Mapping Social Impact Assessment Models: A Literature Overview for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4750-:d:542072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4750/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4750/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricardo J. Bonilla-Alicea & Katherine Fu, 2019. "Systematic Map of the Social Impact Assessment Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-30, July.
    2. Faiza Manzoor & Longbao Wei & Mohammad Nurunnabi & Qazi Abdul Subhan & Syed Irshad Ali Shah & Samaher Fallatah, 2019. "The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Job Performance and CSR as Mediator in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Paolo Biancone & Silvana Secinaro & Valerio Brescia & Daniel Iannaci, 2019. "The Popular Financial Reporting between Theory and Evidence," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(7), pages 45-56, July.
    4. Ming Tang & Huchang Liao & Zhengjun Wan & Enrique Herrera-Viedma & Marc A. Rosen, 2018. "Ten Years of Sustainability (2009 to 2018): A Bibliometric Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Silvana Secinaro & Davide Calandra & Denisa Petricean & Federico Chmet, 2020. "Social Finance and Banking Research as a Driver for Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Nicholls, Alex, 2010. "Institutionalizing social entrepreneurship in regulatory space: Reporting and disclosure by community interest companies," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 394-415, May.
    7. Silvana Secinaro & Luigi Corvo & Valerio Brescia & Daniel Iannaci, 2019. "Hybrid Organizations: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Thorsten Bergmann & Hannes Utikal, 2021. "How to Support Start-Ups in Developing a Sustainable Business Model: The Case of an European Social Impact Accelerator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-29, March.
    9. Nicholls, Alex, 2009. "'We do good things, don't we?': 'Blended Value Accounting' in social entrepreneurship," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 755-769, August.
    10. Björn C. Mitzinneck & Marya L. Besharov, 2019. "Managing Value Tensions in Collective Social Entrepreneurship: The Role of Temporal, Structural, and Collaborative Compromise," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 381-400, October.
    11. Elisa Baraibar-Diez & Manuel Luna & María D. Odriozola & Ignacio Llorente, 2020. "Mapping Social Impact: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Volker Then & Christian Schober & Olivia Rauscher & Konstantin Kehl, 2017. "Social Return on Investment Analysis," Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-3-319-71401-1, October.
    13. Paola Lenzo & Marzia Traverso & Roberta Salomone & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2017. "Social Life Cycle Assessment in the Textile Sector: An Italian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Luigi Corvo & Lavinia Pastore, 2020. "The Usefulness of Sharing Social Impact Data. Early Findings from an International Benchmarking on SROI Assessments," Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises, vol. 9(2), pages 45-61.
    15. Annamaria Di Fabio & José María Peiró, 2018. "Human Capital Sustainability Leadership to Promote Sustainable Development and Healthy Organizations: A New Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, July.
    16. Karen E. Wilson, 2014. "New Investment Approaches for Addressing Social and Economic Challenges," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 15, OECD Publishing.
    17. Alnoor Ebrahim & V. Kasturi Rangan, 2010. "The Limits of Nonprofit Impact: A Contingency Framework For Measuring Social Performance," Harvard Business School Working Papers 10-099, Harvard Business School.
    18. Pablo Aznar-Crespo & Antonio Aledo & Joaquín Melgarejo-Moreno & Arturo Vallejos-Romero, 2021. "Adapting Social Impact Assessment to Flood Risk Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    19. Paolo Esposito & Valerio Brescia & Chiara Fantauzzi & Rocco Frondizi, 2021. "Understanding Social Impact and Value Creation in Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Italian Civil Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura Berardi & Laurie Mook, 2023. "New digital technologies for social impact assessment: Considerations for Italian social economy organizations," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(2 Suppl.), pages 109-132.
    2. Samira FRIOUI & Amel GRAA, 2024. "Bibliometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence in the Scope of E-Commerce: Trends and Progress over the Last Decade," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 5-24, February.
    3. Mohammad Wasiq & Abu Bashar & Syed Akmal & Mustafa Raza Rabbani & Mohd Afzal Saifi & Nishad Nawaz & Youssef Tarek Nasef, 2023. "Adoption and Applications of Blockchain Technology in Marketing: A Retrospective Overview and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Carles Manera & Eloi Serrano & José Pérez-Montiel & Màrian Buil-Fabregà, 2021. "Construction of Biophysical Indicators for the Catalan Economy: Building a New Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Leah Feor & Amelia Clarke & Ilona Dougherty, 2023. "Social Impact Measurement: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Directions," World, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janni Grouleff Nielsen & Rainer Lueg & Dennis van Liempd, 2019. "Managing Multiple Logics: The Role of Performance Measurement Systems in Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Pesci, Caterina & Costa, Ericka & Andreaus, Michele, 2020. "Using accountability to shape the common good," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 67.
    3. Julien Kleszczowski, 2016. "La place des parties prenantes dans l’évaluation de l’impact social des organisations non lucratives: étude empirique au sein d’une organisation française," Post-Print hal-01901230, HAL.
    4. Jessica Aschari-Lincoln & Claus D. Jacobs, 2018. "Enabling Effective Social Impact: Towards a Model for Impact Scaling Agreements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Bucaciuc Anamaria, 2015. "Social Enterprises - From Potential To Impact," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 408-412, July.
    6. Teresa Savall Morera & Carmen Guzmán & Francisco J. Santos, 2022. "Measuring the impact of sheltered workshops through the SROI: A case analysis in southern Spain," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(2), pages 381-415, June.
    7. Adélie Ranville & Marcos Barros, 2022. "Towards Normative Theories of Social Entrepreneurship. A Review of the Top Publications of the Field," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 407-438, October.
    8. Faraudello Alessandra & Barreca Manuela & Iannaci Daniel & Lanzara Federica, 2021. "The Impact of Social Enterprises: A Bibliometric Analysis From 1991 to 2020," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(3), pages 421-434, May.
    9. Ruben Burga & Davar Rezania, 2015. "A Scoping Review of Accountability in Social Entrepreneurship," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, October.
    10. Edward N. Gamble & Haley A. Beer, 2017. "Spiritually Informed Not-for-profit Performance Measurement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 451-468, March.
    11. Erin Chmelik & Martina Musteen & Mujtaba Ahsan, 2016. "Measures of Performance in the Context of International Social Ventures: An Exploratory Study," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 74-100, March.
    12. Elena-Simina Lakatos & Bercea Oana Bianca & Laura Bacali, 2016. "The concept of innovation in social economy. A review and a research agenda," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 11(1), pages 32-50, June.
    13. O'Dwyer, Brendan & Unerman, Jeffrey, 2016. "Fostering rigour in accounting for social sustainability," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 32-40.
    14. Hochstädter, Anna Katharina, 2017. "Impact measurement in venture philanthropy organizationsː A single case study," WiSo-HH Working Paper Series 42, University of Hamburg, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, WISO Research Laboratory.
    15. Neelesh Kumar, 2020. "Social Business Model and its Efficacy: A Case Study on Agroforestry in the Indian Context," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 6(1), pages 195-219, January.
    16. Silvana Secinaro & Davide Calandra & Denisa Petricean & Federico Chmet, 2020. "Social Finance and Banking Research as a Driver for Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Baudot, Lisa & Dillard, Jesse & Pencle, Nadra, 2020. "The emergence of benefit corporations: A cautionary tale," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 67.
    18. Annamaria Di Fabio & Marc A. Rosen, 2019. "Accounting for Individual Differences in Connectedness to Nature: Personality and Gender Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, March.
    19. Plotnieks Dāvis, 2014. "Mechanisms Fostering Social Entrepreneurship as Potential Instruments for Economic Development: The Eastern Partnership Perspective," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 4(2), pages 1-16, October.
    20. Murphy Patrick J. & Pollack Jeff & Nagy Brian & Rutherford Matthew & Coombes Susan, 2019. "Risk Tolerance, Legitimacy, and Perspective: Navigating Biases in Social Enterprise Evaluations," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4750-:d:542072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.